Not exact matches
What is the difference between what Harlequin is doing here and what scammer agents do when they
reject an
author but then steer them to Papa Jack's Editorial to pay a lot of money to «clean up» their
submissions... and Papa Jack is another business owned by that agent?
Agents are inundated with
submissions to such an extent that (a) they are essentially looking for a reason to
reject every
submission they see and (b) they often take six months to let an
author know that his or her work is «not for them».
While still taking
submissions of manuscripts — often unagented
submissions, which has been attractive to
authors who've been
rejected by the first level of gatekeeper to the industry — the numbers of
rejected manuscripts from these new publishers are surprisingly low.
Like I said earlier, it's not really personal — and novelist and photjournalist Heather Hummel talks about this in her blog post for The Huffington Post, «Why Agents
Reject 96 % of
Author Submissions.»
However, the primary anonymity considerations are so that the referees can be frank about shortcomings when
rejecting a paper, and so that the
author will not feel obliged to reciprocate an acceptance when reviewing future
submissions by the referee (s).