Sentences with phrase «reject claims of global warming»

It appears there's a media blitz to recover lost momentum as the public reject claims of global warming.

Not exact matches

«Australian scientists have rejected claims a multi-national climate change body is set to revise down its previous warnings about the rate of global warming.

(Gore has also not addressed this: Another Moonwalker Defies Gore: NASA Astronaut Dr. Buzz Aldrin rejects global warming fears: «Climate has been changing for billions of years» — Moonwalkers Defy Gore's Claim That Climate Skeptics Are Akin To Those Who Believe Moon Landing was «Staged»)

«Mr. Gore's Movie has Claims no Informed Expert Endorses» By Bob Unruh More than 31,000 scientists across the US, «including more than 9,000 PhD.s in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties, have signed a petition rejecting «global warming,» the assumption that the human production of greenhouse -LSB-...]

If someone of the ones who state the assertion about the «stopped» global warming, is able to demonstrate that the Null hypothesis above can be successfully rejected, using proper statistical analysis, I will concede that they indeed have statistical evidence at hand, which indicates something has changed significantly in the global temperature record since 1997 or whatever point is claimed to be the one at which global warming allegedly «stopped».

In early 2008, the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine (OISM) published their Petition Project, a list of names from people who all claimed to be scientists and who rejected the science behind the theory of anthropogenic (human - caused) global warming (AGW).

It would appear rather odd that Bhaskar et al. (2017) would wish to claim, for example, that methane gas has been a significant driver of warming, but at the same time reject water vapour and cloud cover changes as factors affecting global temperatures.

The American Physical Society strenuously disagreed, saying «In light of the significant settled aspects of the science, APS totally rejects Dr. Lewis» claim that global warming is a «scam» and a «pseudoscientific fraud.»»

In support of his persecution complex, Lennart dropped a small bomb about how a paper of his had been rejected by ERL because, according to the Times, «Research which heaped doubt on the rate of global warming was deliberately suppressed by scientists because it was «less than helpful» to their cause, it was claimed last night.»