Sentences with phrase «reject global warming science»

Climate campaigners seem to think they have a winner with this takedown of elected officials who reject global warming science, in which fake news reports talk of the turmoil and tragedy created by Hurricane Marco Rubio, Hurricane James Inhofe, Hurricane John Boehner and more.

Some reject global warming science thanks to a misinformation campaign funded by fossil - fuel companies

Not exact matches

In a CNBC interview last Thursday, Pruitt rejected established science pointing to carbon dioxide as the main driver of recent global warming.

Washington (CNN)- Half of the people who identify with the tea party in a new poll reject the science of global warming (50 %) and evolution (51 %), sentiments that some observers believe portray an increasingly religious electorate that mimics some GOP presidential hopefuls.

The term also came up among those rejecting the science of global warming and the importance of creation care.

One example of this is the «motivated rejection of science»; if you are personally convinced that global warming is a hoax, you are likely to reject any scientific information to the contrary — regardless of its accuracy.

Even if you reject the policy prescriptions or science interpretations of the Global Warming Policy Forum, the director, Benny Peiser, is an energetic aggregator of climate coverage that you might otherwise miss.

There is a lively debate in climate science about how best to compare the importance of these greenhouse gases, and many climatologists deeply immersed in studying human - driven global warming reject the method used by Howarth.

John Cook's study finds that in 1998 there were just three peer reviewed science papers rejecting the evidence that humans were the main cause of global warming.

And how much longer will it be before the public finally rejects the bureaucrat - science quacks and political / institutional / celebrity elites who continue to push the failed CO2 - based anthropogenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis, whose real political agenda is not science related whatsoever.

That makes both of them authors of the less than 3 % of peer - reviewed climate science papers rejecting the consensus on human - caused global warming.

Everything I said is true: I had my original paper on global warming rejected by Science, Nature and PNAS, the three pre-eminent «peer - reviewed» journals that publish climate «science.Science, Nature and PNAS, the three pre-eminent «peer - reviewed» journals that publish climate «science.science.»

Organisations who deny or reject current science on human - caused climate change, such as the Global Warming Policy Foundation in the UK and the Heartland Institute in the US, have published critical reports, and the Republican Party organised congressional testimony against the consensus research on Capitol Hill.

«Mr. Gore's Movie has Claims no Informed Expert Endorses» By Bob Unruh More than 31,000 scientists across the US, «including more than 9,000 PhD.s in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties, have signed a petition rejecting «global warming,» the assumption that the human production of greenhouse -LSB-...]

More than 31,000 scientists across the US, «including more than 9,000 PhD.s in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties, have signed a petition rejecting «global warming,» the assumption that the human production of greenhouse gases is damaging Earth's climate.

In a recent survey by Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, they rejected the science of global warming even more strongly than average Republicans did.

The movie, «Climate Hustle,» questions whether there is a genuine scientific consensus about global warming and features more than 30 scientists who reject mainstream climate science.

In early 2008, the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine (OISM) published their Petition Project, a list of names from people who all claimed to be scientists and who rejected the science behind the theory of anthropogenic (human - caused) global warmingScience and Medicine (OISM) published their Petition Project, a list of names from people who all claimed to be scientists and who rejected the science behind the theory of anthropogenic (human - caused) global warmingscience behind the theory of anthropogenic (human - caused) global warming (AGW).

Climate disaster response rules 1) save lives 2) global warming is here 3) put officials who reject science in jail https://t.co/xLGt79yLOP

We have a lot of work to do so if you want to reject the science and regurgitate long - debunked arguments against global warming, go elsewhere.

Global warming science has become a battleground in a wider cultural war, particularly in the United States where rejecting climate science has been seamlessly adopted by right - wing populism — notably by the Tea Party, the movement of those who demand their fair share of injustice.

For a long time, I've used the term «delusionist» rather than «sceptic» to describe those who reject mainstream science on global warming.

The American Physical Society strenuously disagreed, saying «In light of the significant settled aspects of the science, APS totally rejects Dr. Lewis» claim that global warming is a «scam» and a «pseudoscientific fraud.»»

First of all, Qing - Bin Lu doesn't say there is no global warming — he attributes it to non-CO2 factors in a way that is rejected by the most credible climate science experts.

Politically conservative educators who reject evidence for global warming are increasingly seeking out supplemental materials that present the skeptical view, said Mark McCaffrey, programs and policy director for the National Center for Science Education (NCSE), a science advocacyScience Education (NCSE), a science advocacyscience advocacy group.

Those adjustments have been questioned by some who reject mainstream climate science and have tried to claim there has been a pause in global warming.

And they learn to reject science whenever it comes into conflict with their libertarian ideology, whether it happens to be in the area of carcinogenic dioxins, ozone - destroying CFCs, asbestos - related lung disease, tobacco with all of its associated diseases or anthropogenic global warming due to greenhouse gas emissions.

The right - wing media used the investigation not only to reject Monnett's findings, but also to dismiss all the science on polar bears and global warming.

And, by rejecting the non-problem of man - made global warming, he began the long and necessary process of waking up the likes of Professor Reif to the fact that the diversion of time, effort, and trillions of dollars away from real environmental problems and towards the bogus but (to MIT) profitable non-problem of supposedly catastrophic global warming is as bad for the planet as it is for true science.