Public opinion in the U.S. and other countries decisively
rejects alarmism.
«We should not allow a tiny minority of shoddy scientists and science and extreme ideologues to compete with scientific fact,» he claimed, further exposing either his ignorance or deliberate deception as many of the world's top scientists — including more than a few who have served on the UN's climate bodies —
reject the alarmism.
Not exact matches
«1951» Yes, contemporary documentation that your CO2
alarmism hypothesis was never widely held and was
rejected because of real world empirical data showing lack of correlation of CO2 increase and warming.
Climate change observations so far do not support
alarmism, CCL's obvious goal to lobby government for more mitigation on the basis of the
alarmism is something I totally (and obviously)
reject.
One would think China would have roundly
rejected global warming
alarmism for the western ideological scam that it is... but they havent.
Nevertheless, he
rejects climate
alarmism and alleged «scientific consensus» that increase in the air CO2 concentration from burning fossil fuels...
In two campaigns (1998 - 1999 and 2007) the Petition Project gathered signatures from more than 31,000 scientists, physicians, and engineers (including 9,029 with Ph.D. s) who
reject global warming
alarmism and the draconian measures claimed to be necessary for the entire planet.
Dr. Robinson organized the Petition Project, a statement firmly
rejecting global warming
alarmism signed by more than 31,000 U.S. scientists.
-LSB-...] and
reject climate
alarmism / forced energy
alarmism as the «Enronization» of science.
The proposed solution to combat such denialism and assumed ignorance is «climate justice,» even though over 30,000 scientists
reject global warming
alarmism.