The Supreme Judicial Court
rejected both arguments.
Madam Justice Beames
rejected these arguments and largely granted the Plaintiff's motion.
The Federal Circuit
rejected these arguments.
But the Indiana Supreme Court
rejected these arguments, stating that it was up to the Legislature to determine public policy and that she was convicted not for consuming alcohol but for her «conduct after consumption» (riding as a passenger in a car stopped for a license plate infraction??)
The Court of Appeal
rejected these arguments and upheld the finding of discrimination.
Among other things, the court
rejected arguments that plaintiffs must bring individual Strickland motions.
The Supreme Court
rejected the arguments put forward by Ms Michael's family that the police owe a duty of care in negligence where: (i) they are aware or ought reasonably to be aware of a threat to the life or physical safety of an identifiable person, or member of an identifiable small group («Interveners» Liability Principle»); or alternatively, (ii) a member of the public gives the police apparently credible evidence that a third party, whose identity and whereabouts are known, presents a specific and imminent threat to his life or physical safety («Lord Bingham's Liability Principle»).
The Agency
rejected both arguments after considering all the expert evidence on the issue, noting in part that the carriers together comprised approximately 90 percent of the domestic market, and also that the Supreme Court recognizes cross-subsidization as being reasonable for the achievement of accommodation for persons with disabilities.
Though a judge might reach a reasoned conclusion not to reduce a sentence based on these factors under § 3553 (a), Rita stresses that, even when giving a guideline sentence, a judge should «explain why he has
rejected those arguments» put forward by defendants for a different sentence.
In a third decision, the ARO
rejected the arguments of the worker.
Floyd J
rejected those arguments out of hand.
Moreover, the Commission had a look at the redeeming features (the need to have an adequate network), but
rejected these arguments.
Lord Justice Wilson
rejected these arguments: the judge «was bound to interfere» with the order below; and the way in which he did so «could not reasonably be challenged in [the Court of Appeal]».
The president of a health care company that once was a Wall Street darling was sentenced Tuesday to three and a half years in prison by a judge who
rejected arguments that he deserved a much lengthier term.
The Federation specifically considered and
rejected arguments that TWU illegally discriminates against gays and lesbians.
It rejected arguments that more enhanced damages awards would tilt the balance to disfavor innovation, concluding:
Accordingly, courts have
rejected arguments that the composition of the tribunal or the procedure did not comply with the law of the place of the arbitration where the parties had agreed on other procedural rules.
The Iowa men, accused of making online threats of violence against the World Pokemon Championships competition in Boston, were ordered held without bail Tuesday after Judge Thomas Horgan
rejected arguments by their lawyers that their comments amounted to idle online bravado.
He also
rejected the arguments that teachers would be «harmed» with the release.
She rejected arguments that changes to pay and workload were undermining the teaching profession.
He rejected arguments by the Los Angeles Unified School District and United Teachers Los Angeles that the records were confidential personnel information that, if released, would create discord, stigma, embarrassment, difficulty in recruiting teachers and other harm.
The Supreme Court, however,
rejected those arguments and agreed with the state that the program was enacted....
U.S. District Court Judge William H. Orrick of San Francisco
rejected arguments that the so - called «off the top» funding method violates the First Amendment's ban on government establishment of religion by giving an unfair edge in funding to religious schools.
State Supreme Court Justice Edgar Walker
rejected arguments that Teachout didn't meet the five - year residency requirement to run for governor, finding she maintained a «physical presence» in New York since 2009 even while driving with a Vermont license until last May.
In remarks at the White House, Obama
rejected arguments by Republican opponents of the bill that it will increase the federal deficit.
Also, the appeals court
rejected arguments by Broome County Republican Party Vice Chairman Paul Van Savage, who initially challenged the validity of Jones» petitions, that individuals who circulated the petitions were either ineligible to do so or did not correctly collect signatures.
She rejected arguments for the use of prima facie evidence tests before extradition, saying it would be «absurd» to demand it of «mature legal systems» in the US, Canada and Australia when it is not required for other countries.
But the decision ultimately rested with Justice Department higher - ups, who apparently
rejected arguments from the prosecutors.
Now, the Information Commissioner's Office has
rejected those arguments and ordered the department to publish the papers.
Judges
rejected the arguments of lawyers representing David Chaytor, Elliot Morley and Jim Devine that the trio were protected from facing trial in court because of parliamentary privilege.
The Court of Appeal
rejected the arguments, saying Mars Canada had an obvious interest in defending its trademark rights, and it did sustain actual damages given that its sales were cannibalized by the grey market products.
He rejected arguments by opponents that tougher regulations will discourage investment in expanded access and service improvement.
Judge Barbara Houser ruled that there was «clear and convincing evidence» Sam Wyly committed tax fraud,
rejecting his arguments that he relied on professional advisers to vet the offshore system.
But nothing is clear, and Tsipras (and his supporters) strongly
reject the argument made by conservatives that they are somehow anti-euro.
A federal appeals court signed off on the U.S. Interior Department's decision to take land into trust for a proposed Native American casino,
rejecting arguments that the tribe's promises to mitigate environmental effects are «illusory» because as a sovereign Native American nation, it can not be sued to enforce them.
The Court of Appeal for Ontario has
rejected an argument that a man convicted of three counts of sexual assault should not have to comply with sex offender registration for his entire lifetime, based on constitutional grounds.
The judge also
rejected an argument that other car dealers would suffer «special damage» from Tesla.
The Court of Appeal unanimously
rejected the argument.
New York Supreme Court Judge Jennifer G. Schecter
rejected that argument on Tuesday, arguing that the logic of Clinton v. Jones was just as applicable in state court as in federal court.
Famed hedge fund honcho David Tepper is
rejecting arguments that stocks are overvalued and believes there are still plenty of opportunities in the market.
Famed hedge fund honcho David Tepper is
rejecting arguments that stocks are overvalued and believes there are still plenty of opportunities.
Are there good reasons why I should
reject his arguments or distrust the story he is telling?
Personally
I reject both arguments, but at least they would represent an honest opinion.
It is one thing for the UCC authors to
reject the arguments for dependency and workfare after they have been aired.
My critics
reject the argument that the ruling violates the religious liberty rights of Jews and Muslims; they maintain that, on the contrary, infant circumcision violates the rights of children to bodily integrity and religious liberty, since they can not consent to being circumcised.
At one juncture Craig admits that, «Some persons might be prone to
reject the argument if they thought it involved a beginning to time, which they regard as an impossibility (K 106).
At Nuremberg the civilized world
rejected their argument.
Silverman
rejects that argument.
That seems to me an adequate ground to
reject the argument made by Peter Singer last year in the London Spectator that supports not only abortion but infanticide.
Although it is safe to say that most philosophers
reject the argument, few are now satisfied with parroting Gaunilo or Kant and critical treatments of the argument acknowledge Hartshorne's contributions.