But again these objections can bamboozle people and dishonestly obscure the fact that these hypotheses have been considered and
rejected as explanations for current warming.
This is now generally
rejected as an explanation for sudden past warming events.
Not exact matches
You have chosen to believe it's not possible for God to exist a priori so any possible indication that he may, you simply
reject as not possible even when there is no other scientific
explanation for credible miraculous events (ones that can not be mere coincidences) other than supernatural.
According to the logic you used in «cause and effect» you should
reject «supernatural»
as an
explanation... but you don't and that is why you are being intellectually dishonest.
So in this post, I will look at two traditional
explanations for how God knows what it is like to lose a son, and I will also explain why I
reject both
explanations (which might also be why atheists and other people
reject these
explanations as well).
Rather, the problem is to get them to
reject irrational and supernatural
explanations of the world, the demons that exist only in their imaginations, and to accept a social and intellectual apparatus, Science,
as the only begetter of truth.»
The problem is to get [people] to
reject irrational and supernatural
explanations of the world, the demons that exist only in their imaginations, and to accept a social and intellectual apparatus, Science,
as the only begetter of truth.
«19 He
rejects as untenable the
explanation that a concept of «the Holy» leads to community.20 Accepting the revelatory nature of the church, he briefly sketches the New Testament view of the church.
Richard Lewontin, a Harvard geneticist: «The problem is to get [people] to
reject irrational and supernatural
explanations of the world, the demons that exist only in their imaginations, and to accept a social and intellectual apparatus, Science,
as the only begetter of truth.»
In the course of his answer, the Cardinal said that most scientists
reject «random selection»
as an
explanation of evolution.
Sometimes,
as also among the rabbis, allegory and parable overlap, and we are not in a position to
reject those parables which seem to convey more than one meaning or, for that matter, the
explanations of the parables which occur in the gospels themselves.
People don't
reject it out of greed or ignorance, and libertarians who put these forward
as explanations are kidding themselves.
HUD has
rejected Syracuse's request for $ 2.9 million to revive its shuttered program to detect and remove toxic lead paint from city homes, but could not offer an immediate
explanation as to why.
Lamarck's theory, however, has been
rejected by evolutionary scientists because it is not nearly
as powerful an
explanation of evolution
as natural selection.
You can read the Coalition for Responsible Sharing's full statement here, that gives a detailed
explanation of industry concerns with ResearchGate, the user friendly solutions the site has
rejected that would address these concerns and the action the coalition is taking
as a result.
White's employee, unsurprisingly,
rejected the petition
as «insufficient,» without
explanation.
To be fair, the term itself was widely
rejected by artists working at this narrow - end of the artistic spectrum, and so it was only natural that what started out
as an
explanation of the work, became the rules that governed both its wider understanding and presentation.
«It is not uncommon for meteorologists to
reject global warming
as a cause of these extreme events, offering instead a meteorological
explanation.
FWIW, not so long ago I reviewed a particularly nonsensical paper for an AGU journal, I
rejected it firmly twice, with clear
explanations as to the error, and it was published anyway.
On the other hand their patent was
rejected since their
explanation was incompatible with the current peer reviewed lit (i.e. they're told that the device can't work
as claimed) so lacking protection they are going a different route.
The judge
rejected as a reasonable
explanation the claim that the recordings were subject to litigation privilege.
«I
reject Mr. Pole's
explanations as to his authority to pursue the transfer to the Watch Tower
as his
explanations are wrong in law and appear to be an effort to justify taking his actions,» Ricchetti wrote.
For example, it was one thing to point to an unexplained lifestyle, it might be another if an
explanation was offered but
rejected as untruthful; and taken with other evidence either might be more or less persuasive.
I have also emailed Seven Corners various department email addresses no less than three times this week to request further
explanation as to why my claim was
rejected and received no response.