Eweida's case was previously
rejected by an employment tribunal, which found the wearing of a crucifix is not a requirement of the Christian faith, and then by the court of appeal and the supreme court.
Not exact matches
The
tribunal dismissed his claims of discrimination and harassment and his case was also
rejected by the
employment appeal
tribunal in 2016.
His grievance was
rejected by Capita and he subsequently issued proceedings in the
employment tribunal for direct and indirect sex discrimination and victimisation.
Delivering his judgment, Sir Terence Etherton said the
employment tribunal had been right to
reject PP's submission that Smith had an unfettered right of substitution and to conclude «that the degree of control exercised
by PP over Mr Smith... was also inconsistent with PP being a customer or client of a business run
by Mr Smith.