Sentences with phrase «rejected by other scientists»
Often such claims are independently tested and ultimately verified or rejected by other scientists.
http://www.sciencemag.org/ Not exact matches
However, sources tell ScienceInsider that several prominent scientists and nuclear policy heavyweights rejected the Administration's overtures, and that other candidates were thought to carry too much political baggage to be confirmed by the Senate.
Comiso and other climate scientists reject the suggestion that his data set may overestimate the recent trend in Antarctic sea - ice growth — by as much as two - thirds, according to Eisenman's analysis.
In other news, Archbishop Desmond Tutu has urged Uganda to reject its «Kill the Gays» bill, likening it to the apartheid Africa fought so long to reject, scientists have found homosexual behaviour in male animals makes them more attractive to female animals (okay, at least in fish), and Simon & Schuster have launched a new self - publishing arm brought to you by the Author Solutions crew — they who rip off would - be authors for thousands of dollars and take half of any sales that eventuate.
Comiso and other climate scientists reject the suggestion that his data set may overestimate the recent trend in Antarctic sea - ice growth — by as much as two - thirds, according to Eisenman's analysis.
Climate Consensus and «Misinformation»: a Rejoinder to «Agnotology, Scientific Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Climate Change» decisively rejects suggestions by Cook and others that those who say few scientists explicitly support the supposedly near - unanimous climate consensus are misinforming and misleading the public.
«Mr. Gore's Movie has Claims no Informed Expert Endorses» By Bob Unruh More than 31,000 scientists across the US, «including more than 9,000 PhD.s in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties, have signed a petition rejecting «global warming,» the assumption that the human production of greenhouse -LSB-...]
=========== Surely suggesting a scientist's paper has «been rejected by other journals» is not something nice to say, especially if it may not be true.
If there were 2,225 peer reviewed papers published by 9,136 contributing scientists from 2012 to 2013, and only one of them rejected the position that there is no such thing as intelligent life on other planets (ILOOP), therefore, 99.999 % of these scientific papers «reject ILOOP».
One after the other, eminent scientists with qualifications and distinctions far superior to those claimed by Mann, set out what is wrong with Mann's work, and why they reject it...
Perhaps the following 1993 hypothesis (perhaps made by others, but personally propoed to & rejected by «The New Scientist») may find some following.