The harmonic waves that create matter are understood by some but
rejected by the consensus of quantum mechanics, a one hundred year failure of ever increasing complexity and more theories than you can poke a stick at.
• the central contention of the documentary − that the observed warming is due to increased solar activity − has been thoroughly considered and
rejected by the consensus process of climate scientists.
Not exact matches
Within the dominant
consensus, as the historical synopsis has also shown comprehensive teleology is
rejected not only
by all because it is metaphysical but also
by some because it is teleological.
The ACSM
consensus statement appears to
reject earlier guidelines (Colorado and AAN) that focused heavily on loss of consciousness and retrograde amnesia (RGA) and to endorse the retrospective approach of the Cantu revised and Prague guidelines in viewing an approach to the return - to - play decision that considered «RGA, PTA, as well as the number and duration of additional signs and symptoms» as «more accurate in predicting severity and outcome ¡ -[and hence] more useful,» and
by endorsing an individualized RTP decision, not one «based on a rigid timeline» [like the Colorado, AAN and Cantu Revised Guidelines)
So the current US government is
rejecting both emission reductions
by rich industrialized nations and adaptation assistance to poor developing nations that will experience the worst consequences of the rich nations» emissions, and is blocking international
consensus.
When an economist at the Environmental Protection Agency
rejected the Obama administration's stance on global warming
by writing an unsolicited report challenging the scientific
consensus on greenhouse dangers, groups fighting restrictions on greenhouse gases hailed him as a courageous maverick.
Of course, not everybody who
reject the
consensus is driven
by right - wing ideology.
These uncertainties are exploited
by those — such as Myron Ebell, head of Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency transition team — who
reject the broad scientific
consensus that humans are warming the Earth.
I think many (
by no means all) skeptics are motivated
by an instinctive humanism and understanding of freedom which leads them to
reject the scientised green
consensus.
Thirty - seven percent of Americans
reject this
consensus, saying that climate change is most likely caused
by natural fluctuations.
Climate
Consensus and «Misinformation»: a Rejoinder to «Agnotology, Scientific
Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Climate Change» decisively
rejects suggestions
by Cook and others that those who say few scientists explicitly support the supposedly near - unanimous climate
consensus are misinforming and misleading the public.
Judith, how about an article starting
by mentioning «the reason why educated Liberals
reject the
consensus on climate change science»?
This post examines the thesis that motivated reasoning
by climate scientists is adversely impacting the public trust in climate science and provides a reason for people to
reject the
consensus on climate change science.
However, the paper has also been the subject of intense criticism
by people who
reject the scientific
consensus.
By these association leaders merely asserting they believe the opinion of the «
consensus» of scientists, they have simultaneously
rejected the overwhelming
consensus of scientists (1,056 studies to 1, and counting) who were actually involved in performing these studies.
I do not believe it is just the present US Administration driving this but includes scientists who have left, or been
rejected by, the «
consensus» and who are increasingly reaching out, building a
consensus of their own.
The one thing these attacks have in common is almost all were conducted
by individuals or groups who
reject the scientific
consensus on human - caused global warming.
Every movement that has
rejected a scientific
consensus, whether it be on evolution, climate change or the link between smoking and cancer, exhibits the same five characteristics of science denial (concisely summarized
by the acronym FLICC).
We identified representative claims about climatological data made
by people who
reject the mainstream scientific
consensus on climate change.
This would not be possible if, as you claim, abstracts that «
reject» the
consensus claimed that less than 50 % of warming was caused
by man, and papers that «endorse» it claimed that more than 50 % of warming was caused
by man.
On remand from Daubert, the lower court's unease with this new task was clearly evident: «Our responsibility, then, unless we misread the Supreme Court's opinion is to resolve disputes among respected, well credentialed scientists about matters squarely within their expertise, in areas where there is no scientific
consensus as to what is or what is not «good science,» and occasionally to
reject such expert testimony because it was not «derived
by the scientific method.»
Blockchains, running over several nodes,
reject changes to data once written, except
by consensus of a majority or all of the nodes or
by abusing the «longest chain rule» whose purpose is to resolve near - simultaneous block creation.
Public sentiment on the ground suggests a genuine
consensus to keep trading open and accessible, with last week's petition to
reject a ban on cryptocurrency trading gathering over 150,000 signatures
by press time.