Sentences with phrase «rejected by their peer»

It's the story of how an upright and virtuous man was rejected by his peers,...

In one study, about half of all preschooler social overtures were rejected by peers (Corsaro 1981).

Studies of both Western and Chinese children report that kids are more likely to be rejected by their peers when their parents practice authoritarian parenting — an approach characterized by low levels of warmth and high levels of control.

Kids who feel rejected by peers become less motivated at school, which can lead to a downward spiral of lower achievement, increased behavior problems, and even more social rejection.

And kids with behavior problems are more likely to get rejected by their peers.

The power, which was compared by human rights groups to the policies of Saddam Hussein, was rejected by the peers last month when they voted to send the clause to a parliamentary committee.

«What we found was another example of a downward spiral — those rejected by peers then turned to consumer culture, which actually worsened, rather than improved, those relationships.»

It is not an issue you easily can ignore, especially if it results in a student being ridiculed and rejected by her peers.

And then there is relational bullying, where some children are ignored, excluded from games or parties, rejected by peers, or are the victims of gossip and other forms of public humiliation and shaming.

When they have a conflict with their teachers, they learn less and they are more likely to be rejected by peers,» she said.

«If the manuscripts of climate change skeptics are rejected by peer - reviewed science journals, they can always send their studies to Energy and Environment.»

You had at least two papers rejected by your peers that I know of.

Kids may fear being rejected by their peers.

Studies of both Western and Chinese children report that kids are more likely to be rejected by their peers when their parents practice authoritarian parenting — an approach characterized by low levels of warmth and high levels of control.

Girls who bully are more likely than boys to be rejected by peers, putting them at even greater risk for chronic offending.94

As a result, they tend to spend more time onlooking (watching other children without joining) and hovering on the edge of social groups.8, 11 There is some evidence to suggest that young depressive children also experience social impairment.12 For example, children who display greater depressive symptoms are more likely to be rejected by peers.10 Moreover, deficits in social skills (e.g., social participation, leadership) and peer victimization predict depressive symptoms in childhood.13, 14 There is also substantial longitudinal evidence linking social withdrawal in childhood with the later development of more significant internalizing problems.15, 16,17 For example, Katz and colleagues18 followed over 700 children from early childhood to young adulthood and described a pathway linking social withdrawal at age 5 years — to social difficulties with peers at age 15 years — to diagnoses of depression at age 20 years.

Feeling rejected by peers at school, school failure and inflexible discipline practices from teaching staff can lead to worsening of serious behavioural difficulties.

Persistent, poorly controlled antisocial behaviour, however, is socially handicapping and often leads to poor adjustment in adults.1 It occurs in 5 % of children, 2 and its prevalence is rising.3 The children live with high levels of criticism and hostility from their parents and are often rejected by their peers.3 Truancy is common, most leave school with no qualifications, and over a third become recurrent juvenile offenders.4 In adulthood, offending usually continues, relationships are limited and unsatisfactory, and the employment pattern is poor.

This kind of student, in particular, can face elevated levels of depression, poor self - esteem, heightened aggression, and contemplate suicide — and is more likely to be rejected by peers, have poor social skills, be impulsive and easily provoked, and have trouble in learning.

Children who are rejected by peers often have difficulties focusing their attention and controlling their behavior.

Shy children are at greater risk of being rejected by peers, but when shy children possess a well - developed ability to recognize emotions, this risk is much reduced (Sette et al 2016).

For other children, however, being ignored or rejected by peers may be a lasting problem that has lifelong consequences, such as a dislike for school, poor self - esteem, social withdrawal, and difficulties with adult relationships.

Once rejected by peers, disliked children may find themselves excluded from peer activities and exposed to ostracism, or more severely to victimization by peers.

Males on this chronic physical aggression (CPA) trajectory tend to grow - up in adverse family environments [4], [7]--[9], have lower cognitive abilities [10], tend to be rejected by their peers from early childhood onwards [11] and have numerous physical, mental and social problems such as accidents, hyperactivity, school failure, substance abuse and unemployment [4], [5], [10], [12]--[14].

Children who are rejected by their peers may take more distance from the norms of conventional social institutions (such as school), putting them at risk for problem behaviors (Coie, 1990; Hinshaw, 1992; Masten et al., 2005).

Young children with challenging behavior are often rejected by their peers and receive less positive feedback from teachers than their peers do (Hemmeter, Ostrosky, & Fox 2006).

Researchers have found that children with ADHD are approximately four times more likely to be rejected by their peers relative to typical children [3], even after periods of social contact as brief as a few hours [13, 14].

For example, by the end of the first day of a summer program, children with ADHD were more rejected by peers than non-ADHD participants.13 Similarly, in a play group study that involved placing children with ADHD in groups with unfamiliar non-ADHD peers, the non-ADHD participants began complaining about the behavior of their ADHD peers within minutes.12 These studies provide compelling evidence that the peer problems of children with ADHD follow them wherever they go.

In addition to being rejected by peers, children with ADHD demonstrate impairment in their friendships [17].

Not exact matches

Children's worries about their peer relationships rank high — they worry about being rejected or excluded by their classmates, and they worry that their close friends will betray them.

I was horrified to discover the [2010] media attention given to the findings of Prof. Marjorie Gunnoe's small, twice - rejected - by - peer - reviewed - journals, study on the positive value of spanking children.

They are very likely to be rejected, excluded, or bullied by their peers — partly because their behavior is so unpleasant and partly because they have very few friends to protect or defend them.

The Home Office's plans to gather more data about mobile phone calls and other electronic communications were rejected as «overkill» by MPs and peers in two reports out today.

Now it looks like we will have an elected Lords, which is accepted by some peers and rejected by others.

But the Cabinet minister said the Commons had «plainly and clearly» voted against the initial amendments moved by peers to reopen the Leveson inquiry, as he urged MPs to reject the latest measures.

Liff noted that the County's screening panel, which includes representatives from the borough's many smaller bar associations, has in the past rejected the prefered candidate of former party boss Vito Lopez and typically find the same judges to be qualified as the peer - review committees run by the bar associations.

Russell went on to argue that «one peer described the convention [of not rejecting delegated legislation] as «hanging by a thread»».

A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences reported that, of 1008 articles, «[a] ll 14 of the most highly cited papers in the study were rejected by the three elite journals, and 12 of those were bounced before they could reach peer review.

Difficulties can be overt — as when teens are bullied by peers or rejected by family members — or subtle, she says.

Perhaps she lacks social skills, feels rejected or isolated by peers, and is trying to fit in.

Fear of failure, being rejected, being laughed at, heckled by peers or whatever.

Where were the Peer Review Teams to approve quality research showing the holes in the Buy - and - Hold Model (Wade Pfau's research showing the superiority of Valuation - Informed Indexing over Buy - and - Hold was rejected by two journals before finding a home at a journal he characterized as solid but as something less than one of the most influential journals in the field)?

In 2005, the artist opened lesser new york in her Williamsburg loft, which was a response to Greater New York (2005) but it was lesser; it was a greater response to the lesser limits of the art world that she saw reflected in PS1's concurrent survey; this lesser exhibit / installation was organized under the auspices of a «fia backström production,» a lesser production of curated ephemera such as press releases, invites, posters, and so on culled from found materials and the work of a greater local network of friends and peers; the lesser aesthetics of dejecta, pasted directly onto the walls, reflects a greater decorative pattern, not unlike Rorschach images of a lesser art industry itself within a critique of a greater institutional relationship to art production; as such, the lesser display of curated ephemera (from nonartists and artists alike) not only comments on the greater vortex of art and capital, but also serves as a lesser gesture toward something like a memorial wall, not unlike a collection of posters on the greater Berlin Wall, or a lesser improvisational 9 - 11 wall, or, more recently, a greater Facebook wall, or the lesser construction wall surrounding the Second Avenue gas explosion in the East Village, all pointing to a lesser memorial for the greater commodified institution of art consumption; whereas in Backström's lesser new york each move repels consumption by both the lesser value of the pasted paper and its repetition, which dispels the greater value of precious originals; so the act of reinstalling lesser new yorkten years later at Greater New York — the very institution that rejected her a decade earlier — speaks to the nefarious long arm of Capitalism that can morph into an owner of its own critique; so that lesser new york is greater than its initial critique, greater than a work of institutional critique: it is a continuous institutional relationship, a lesser critique that keeps on giving in its new contexts; the collective spirit of artists working together playfully is lesser, whereas the critique of how artists can imagine working alongside the institution is greater, or vice versa; the lesser gesture of a curated mixed - media installation in one's home with no clear identification and no commercial validity becomes untethered when it is greater, and this particular lesser becomes greater in the Greater New York (2015) context; still, the instabilities of the organizing systems by Backström continue to put pressure on both the defining features of art production in both the lesser context and the decade - later greater one; further, the greater question of what constitutes an art as a lesser art becomes a dizzying conundrum when the greater art institution frames the lesser to be greater, when the lesser is invested in its lesser relationship to the greater.

McIntyre and McKitrick (2005), in a paper they have managed to slip through the imperfect peer - review filter of GRL, now simply recycle the very same false claims made by them previously in their comment on MBH98 that was rejected by Nature.

They realize that the vast majority of their efforts will be rejected by a well functioning peer review process, but the value of securing even a small number of acceptances is enormous, so they bombard journals with a stream of scientific - appearing work in hopes that a few will break through and reach publication.

Both claims, which are of course false, were made in a comment on MBH98 by MM that was rejected by Nature, and subsequently parroted by astronomer Richard Muller in a non peer - reviewed setting — see e.g. this nice discussion by science journalist David Appell of Muller's uncritical repetition of these false claims.

In reviewing more than 2,000 peer - reviewed publications, authored by over 9,000 authors between November 2012 and December 2013, geochemist James Powell found just one author who rejected global warming.

Everything I said is true: I had my original paper on global warming rejected by Science, Nature and PNAS, the three pre-eminent «peer - reviewed» journals that publish climate «science.»

Editors can practice peer review censorship by selecting high priests of the prevailing wisdom to review and reject articles they consider heresy.

I see problems with: * you have to be an active promoter of yourself to get articles read * the review process (mainly there is no ability to assess why rejected articles are rejected and the time wasting because of pedantic comments) * project - based funding and treating research like consulting (if I can tell you how much a project will cost, then by definition it is not research) * since academia seems to be drifting towards consulting, researchers start to become underpaid compared to peers in consulting * the focus on the number of publications weighted by the rank of the journal * status is based on if you publish in a high - rank journal, «selected» to be a lead author, and so on, and not whether you do good and creative research, good collaborator, good colleague to peers, etc..