Early last year, I
accepted the journal's invitation to review Recursive Fury, a narrative analysis
of blog posts published by climate deniers * in response to Lewandowsky's earlier work in which he and his colleagues showed that endorsement
of free - market economics and a propensity for conspiratorial thinking are contributing factors in the
rejection of science.
They will seek to do similar but perhaps not quite in similar style to Abbott, because they tend to open and proud
of their
rejection of mainstream climate
science whereas Abbott hides his
rejection behind a pretense
of accepting it as having some reality but rejecting it's seriousness or urgency — and rejecting all climate policy that might reflect that seriousness.