Not exact matches
You have chosen to believe it's not possible for God to exist a priori so any possible indication that he may, you simply
reject as not possible even when there is no other scientific
explanation for credible miraculous events (ones that can not be mere coincidences) other than
supernatural.
According to the logic you used in «cause and effect» you should
reject «
supernatural» as an
explanation... but you don't and that is why you are being intellectually dishonest.
Rather, the problem is to get them to
reject irrational and
supernatural explanations of the world, the demons that exist only in their imaginations, and to accept a social and intellectual apparatus, Science, as the only begetter of truth.»
The problem is to get [people] to
reject irrational and
supernatural explanations of the world, the demons that exist only in their imaginations, and to accept a social and intellectual apparatus, Science, as the only begetter of truth.
Richard Lewontin, a Harvard geneticist: «The problem is to get [people] to
reject irrational and
supernatural explanations of the world, the demons that exist only in their imaginations, and to accept a social and intellectual apparatus, Science, as the only begetter of truth.»