The black line, reconstructed from ISCCP satellite data, «is a purely statistical parameter that has little physical meaning as it does not account for the non-linear relations between cloud and surface properties and planetary albedo and does not include aerosol
related albedo changes such as associated with Mt. Pinatubo, or human emissions of sulfates for instance» (Real Climate).
Not exact matches
Both are
related to feedback mechanisms which can amplify or dampen initial
changes, such as the connection between temperature and the
albedo associated with sea - ice and snow.
Most of it temperature
related which was driven by
change in
albedo due to Earth dynamics — some 25W / m2 less reflected shortwave.
But again such global averages are of little value: regional observations should be
related to the regional cloud coverage and
albedo and possibly to
changes of the strength of surface currents.
Solar radiative forcing is a direct energy source to the Earth and is
related to the
change in TSI by ΔF = ΔTSI · (1 − A) / 4, where A is the Earth's
albedo.
Is it a
change in
albedo, perhaps
related to ice extent?
Hall and Qu (2006) show that biases of a number of MMD models in reproducing the observed seasonal cycle of land snow cover (especially the spring melt) are tightly
related to the large variations in snow
albedo feedback strength simulated by the same models in climate
change scenarios.
What was learned is that climate
change is
related to
albedo, as a result of the
change in the amount of energy from the sun that is absorbed by the Earth.
It is logical to presume that
changes in Earth's
albedo are due to increases and decreases in low cloud cover, which in turn is
related to the climate
change that we have observed during the 20th Century, including the present global cooling.
You have lots of physical impacts
related to permafrost,
albedo, ice area covered, etc and those
changes project onto ecology, politics, socio - economics, etc..