Sentences with phrase «related court opinions»

The bloggers summarize and link to the latest FOIA - related court opinions, reports from the Department of Justice's Office of Information Policy and FOIA - related op - eds.

Another tab lists Daubert challenges to the expert and similarly links to related court opinions or docket information, when available.

For those living in Florida year - round or just in the winter months, as well as those who have an interest in a Florida intestate estate but who live in another country or state, we can help them in the analysis and application of the Florida Probate Intestacy Laws as well as the related court opinions to Florida intestacy succession.

Not exact matches

Results will include opinions issued by the SEC and federal appellate courts that relate to FINRA disciplinary actions that have been appealed.

Accordingly, notwithstanding receipt by HP Co. of the IRS private letter ruling and the tax opinions referred to above, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not assert that the distribution and / or certain related transactions do not qualify for tax - free treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes or that a court would not sustain such a challenge.

Even before Yigal Amir was sentenced to life imprisonment for the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin, a related trial had already been concluded in the court of public opinion.

The European rejection of the death penalty, which advocates of abolishing the death penalty in the United States cite as evidence of an emerging international consensus that ought to influence our Supreme Court, is related both to the past overuse of it by European nations (think of the executions for petty larceny in eighteenth - century England, the Reign of Terror in France, and the rampant employment of the death penalty by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union) and to the less democratic cast of European politics, which makes elite opinion more likely to override public opinion there than in the United States [emboldening mine].

Any posts relating to families, child custody litigation, substance abuse, etc. are based on Rhonda's experience as an investigator for the state and the family courts and are solely her opinion.

In a climate case, more so than any other policy - related case, courts need to inform themselves of the range of scientific opinions, the specific points of agreement and disagreements, the assumptions made by scientists, their theories and reasoning, the validity and accuracy of the models used, the unknowns, uncertainties, and gradations, etc..

On June 26, 2012, the court issued an opinion which dismissed the challenges to the EPA's endangerment finding and the related GHG regulations.

The guide relates that the online materials cited in one Supreme Court bench opinion were already «deleted before the opinion was published in the U. S. Reports.»

This new Protocol, which has been referred to as the «Protocol of the dialogue» by Dean Spielmann, the President of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), creates the possibility for supreme courts of the Contracting States to the Convention to request an advisory opinion from the ECtHR on «questions of principle relating to the interpretation or application of the rights and freedoms defined in the Convention or the protocols thereto» [1].

According to the Court it «did no more than acknowledge the fact that, as stated by the Council in the course of the proceedings relating to that Opinion, there was no possibility of the required majority being obtained within the Council for the Union to be able to exercise alone the external competence that it shares with the Member States in this area.»

The practice center's main page includes federal and state court opinions related to e-discovery, federal and state rules and laws related to e-discovery, news and law reports, and BNA's E-Discovery Portfolio series, which provides an entry point to resources such as practice guides, books and treatises, and law reviews, as well as specific guidance on such issues as understanding and preventing spoliation.

In a post here recently, I mourned the death of Peter Nordberg, creator of the website Daubert on the Web and of the related blog, Blog 702, both devoted to the Supreme Court's seminal opinion on expert evidence.

There is also a collection of significant court opinions relating to military commissions and of current and historical documents pertaining to the commissions.

For exactly this reason, Advocate General Léger rightly advised in his opinion in the Baustahlgewebe case that the jurisdiction of the General Court must be understood «as not extending to actions for compensation relating to judicial acts of that Court itself» (para 70).

Far too often — at least in my opinion — courts and legislators don't seem to understand technology related issues or how the law should fit with them.

On November 26, 2014 the Kentucky Court of Appeals issued an unpublished opinion related to the rights to a former spouse to collect against an insurance policy.

Samsung argues that it was Apple's choice to base its» 647 - related arguments on a broader claim construction than the one the Federal Circuit ultimately affirmed (Samsung says «Apple «shot for the moon»»), and «Apple's risk failed» when the appeals court handed down its opinion in what I always just call the «Posner case».

Among lawyers nationwide, he was widely known as the creator of the website Daubert on the Web and later of the related blog, Blog 702, both devoted to the Supreme Court's seminal opinion on expert evidence.

It held «this opinion of the Court relates only to the nature of the competence of the European Union to sign and conclude the envisaged agreement.

Commentary on news events and recent court opinions, primarily in constitutional law, and links to related articles.

The privilege applies only if (1) the asserted holder of the privilege is or sought to become a client; (2) the person to whom the communication was made (a) is a member of the bar of a court, or his subordinate and (b) in connection with this communication is acting as a lawyer; (3) the communication relates to a fact of which the attorney was informed (a) by his client (b) without the presence of strangers (c) for the purpose of securing primarily either (i) an opinion on law or (ii) legal services or (iii) assistance in some legal proceeding, and not (d) for the purpose of committing a crime or tort; and (4) the privilege has been (a) claimed and (b) not waived by the client.

Be that as it may, and in the rather theoretical event of a supreme court not bound to go before the ECJ under 267 TFEU — whatever the reason — and choosing to ask the ECtHR for an advisory opinion, it is clear that the subject matter of a valid request could only be an issue relating to the Convention and not to EU law, as the ECtHR has no competence to interpret EU law.

«Feds seek extra redactions in drone memo»: Josh Gerstein of Poliico.com has a blog post that begins, «The Justice Department plans to ask a federal appeals court to delete additional material from a drone - related legal opinion before it's made public — redactions that would go beyond those the court approved last month, a government lawyer said in a legal filing Tuesday night.»

«Updates in the field of personal injury law as practiced in Tennessee, primarily through posting and comment on personal injury - related judicial opinions published by the Tennessee Court of Appeals and Tennessee Supreme Court.»

The Supreme Court also renders advisory opinions to the Governor, upon request, on questions relating to the Governor's constitutional duties and powers.

For example, Feldman analyzed the quality of Supreme Court merits briefs using a composite of features such as passivity, wordiness, sentence length, and tone.63 He found that brief readability was positively associated with the percentage of brief language adopted in the opinion and that the association was highly significant.64 Similarly, Collins et al. analyzed the «cognitive clarity» and plain language of Supreme Court amicus briefs.65 They measured cognitive clarity using the dictionary - based Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count program (LIWC), which relied on an index of categories that relate to cognitive clarity such as «causation, insight, discrepancy, inhibition, tentativeness, certainty, exclusiveness, inclusiveness, negations, and the percentage of words containing six or more letters.»

Recently, in a «rare» discovery - related opinion, the Supreme Court weighed in on the limits of inherent authority to award attorney's fees and costs as a sanction for discovery misconduct.

To the extent that Palmer suggests a generally applicable proposition that legislative purpose is irrelevant in constitutional adjudication, our prior cases — as indicated in the text — are to the contrary; and, very shortly after Palmer, all Members of the Court majority in that case joined the Court's opinion in Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U. S. 602 (1971), which dealt with the issue of public financing for private schools and which announced, as the Court had several times before, that the validity of public aid to church - related schools includes close inquiry into the purpose of the challenged statute.

The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Cunningham, discussed CR 43.02 relating to the order of proof at trial, and noted that a trial court has discretion to regulate the order of presentation of proof at tCourt, in an opinion by Justice Cunningham, discussed CR 43.02 relating to the order of proof at trial, and noted that a trial court has discretion to regulate the order of presentation of proof at tcourt has discretion to regulate the order of presentation of proof at trial.

www.state.il.us/court Opinions of the Court, including published opinions arising out of attorney disciplinary proceedings, and the rules relating to admission, registration, professional responsibility and the Code of JudicialOpinions of the Court, including published opinions arising out of attorney disciplinary proceedings, and the rules relating to admission, registration, professional responsibility and the Code of Judicialopinions arising out of attorney disciplinary proceedings, and the rules relating to admission, registration, professional responsibility and the Code of Judicial Conduct

Since 2000, Micah has presented the Pennsylvania Bar Association's annual marketing ethics program (as part of its three times per year «Ethics Potpourri» programming in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh), changing the focus each year to address ethics topics that have included an analysis of U.S. Supreme Court cases, advertising ethics opinions across the country, lawyer rankings and ratings, use of social media, blogs, traditional marketing approaches and missteps, internet marketing, solicitation, multi-jurisdictional practices, and state - by - state advertising requirements as they relate to everything from pre-approvals, language limitations, disciplinary actions, and the myriad of ways a law firm can (often unknowingly) violate the Rules of Professional Conduct.

The recent Court of Appeals opinion made rulings on two distinct but related lead poisoning cases....

dictum: A part of a written opinion in a court case that is related to the case, but not needed to decide it.

2 These circumstances raise two sets of issues to which this opinion is addressed: first, the ethical and practical concerns posed in a lawyer - client relationship when a limited scope engagement is entered into; and second, issues related to the obligation of lawyers to reveal the existence of such a limited scope engagement to others involved in the matter, most particularly to courts before whom clients are appearing pro se, with assistance from a lawyer with whom he or she has a limited scope engagement.

Born 1950; lawyer (1974 - 80); law degree from the University of Athens (1973); diploma of advanced studies (DEA) in labour law from the University of Paris II, Panthéon - Sorbonne (1977); national expert with the Legal Service of the Commission of the European Communities (1988 - 1990), then Principal Administrator in Directorate General V (Employment, Industrial Relations, Social Affairs)(1990 - 1994); Junior Officer, Junior Member and, since 1999, Member of the Greek Council of State; Associate Member of the Superior Special Court of Greece; Member of the Central Legislative Drafting Committee of Greece (1996 - 98); Director of the Legal Service in the General Secretariat of the Greek Government (1996 - 1998); Judge at the General Court of the European Union (1998 to 2010, President of Chamber from 2004 to 2010); Member of the Supreme Council for Administrative Justice (2011 - 2012); Member of the Special Court for Disputes relating to the Remuneration of Judges and of the Special Court for Actions against Judges (2013 - 2014); Member of the Advisory Panel of Experts on Candidates for Election as Judge to the European Court of Human Rights (2014 - 2015); Member of the Committee responsible for giving an Opinion on Candidates» Suitability to perform the Duties of Judge at the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (2012 - 2015); Lecturer in European Law at the National School for the Judiciary (1995 - 1996 and 2012 - 2015); Judge at the Court of Justice since 7 October 2015.

KG v. CAE Machinery Ltd. (1995), 62 C.P.R. (3d) 26 (F.C.T.D.) that «I am also of the opinion that, in general, summary judgment is not the proper means to obtain judgment where the issues before the court involve the infringement or the invalidity of a patent», most contested intellectual property decisions in the Federal Court on summary trials and judgment on the merits have related to trademarks or copyright, or arise where the responding party is not participacourt involve the infringement or the invalidity of a patent», most contested intellectual property decisions in the Federal Court on summary trials and judgment on the merits have related to trademarks or copyright, or arise where the responding party is not participaCourt on summary trials and judgment on the merits have related to trademarks or copyright, or arise where the responding party is not participating.

Zeus Law Associates is a corporate commercial law firm that provides a whole range of legal activities including appearance in courts, client briefings and conferences, opinion writing and guidance, research work and several other related activities.

The Hungarian domestic court posed two questions to the CJEU, essentially asking whether the application of Article 4 of Council Directive 2004 / 83 / EC, in the light of Article 1 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (EU Charter), precludes forensic psychologists» expert opinions based on projective personality tests from being used in asylum adjudication relating to LGBTI (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex) claimants.

The sought - after opinion may relate to who should have custody of a child, and whether court - ordered visitation terms should perhaps limit contact or set conditions as a prerequisite.

Plaintiff appealed and, in an unpublished opinion (Docket No. 1E33202, June 14, 1996) the Court vacated the trial court's order, finding that the separation agreement was a separate contract to which those remedies applied and that the claim of fraud related to the contract and not the divorce judgCourt vacated the trial court's order, finding that the separation agreement was a separate contract to which those remedies applied and that the claim of fraud related to the contract and not the divorce judgcourt's order, finding that the separation agreement was a separate contract to which those remedies applied and that the claim of fraud related to the contract and not the divorce judgment.

Joffrey Long P.S. I should state here that nothing I said represents an opinion about, or relates in any way to any particular case, or any matter previously, now or anticipated to appear in any arbitration, court proceeding, mediation, or other legal proceeding.