Relations to other living things are important, especially to children.
Psychologists are very interested in how the mature mind sorts the living world and where we put ourselves in
relation to other life - forms.
These ratings reflect the financial strength of the life insurance company and its rankings in
relation to all other life insurance companies.
Not exact matches
My friend, Jeffrey Madoff (no
relation to the
other Madoff), teaches a wonderful class, Creativity: Making a
Living With Your Ideas, with tremendous guests.
«The issue of cross-border financial activity, or cross-border activity, is a very real and
live one and IOSCO and
other international forums is absolutely crucial
to try and resolve it, and it's not just in
relation to short - selling activity, it's in
relation to cyber activity, it's in
relation to offering financial products.
He frequently cites the work of Frank Furstenburg and Arlie Hochschild, two sociologists of family and gender
relations whose views are by no means ideologically conservative, and he avoids value - loaded language, especially when it comes
to describing the mainline Protestant churches whose leadership has, by and large, capitulated
to the secular - elitist acceptance of extramarital sex, abortion, homosexuality, and
other practices that conservative Christians view as inimical
to moral
life and family health.
1) Because it makes
living in a community easier, and smoother, and fosters good
relations between
others that could be of benefit
to either myself or the community at large.
According
to the Patriarch, the Council «will address internal issues of the unity and administration of the Church, but also matters such as
relations with
other churches and faiths, in order
to present a unified voice and credible witness for the
life of the world.»
Nor does it help much
to give an accounting of one's debt
to particular thinkers, since such an attention
to one's
relation to other minds in the intellectual community, whose
life is continuous in time and beyond discrete place through the mystery of sign itself, violates the reality necessary
to that community.
In
other words, we must develop a new ethic and,
to be frank, a new logic with
relation to nature, based on the conviction that, as Father Gustavo Gutiérrez of Peru says, «
life and not death has the last word.»
Another attempts
to assimilate the Christian with the revolutionary vocabulary: «Revolution restores the
relation of man
to man; it is a transformation of
life, a renewal, a regeneration, a new
life» — in
other words, the equivalent of conversion.
I've learned that the criticisms that hurt me the most are not the ones that have no
relation to reality, but the ones that, deep down, I desperately fear are true («you don't have any fruit in your
life,» «you rebel for the sake of rebelling,» «you don't care if you destroy
other people's faith»).
The present volume is really a collection of studies, and it might easily have grown
to twice its size if
other topics had been included: for example the miracle stories — I should have liked
to examine Alan Richardson's new book on The Miracle - Stories of the Gospels (1942)-- or a fuller study of the so - called messianic consciousness of Jesus, the theory of interim ethics, the
relation of eschatology and ethics in Jesus» teachings — see Professor Amos N. Wilder's book on the subject, Eschatology and Ethics in the Teaching of Jesus (1939)-- the influence of the Old Testament upon the earliest interpretation of the
life of Jesus — see Professor David E. Adams» new book, Man of God (1941), and Professor E. W. K. Mould's The World - View of Jesus (1941)-- or sonic of the topics treated in the new volume of essays presented
to Professor William Jackson Lowstuter, New Testament Studies (1942), edited by Professor Edwin Prince Booth.
It means making sense out of the
relations that human beings and
other living things have toward the overall patterns of nature in ways that give us some sense of their proper
relations to one another,
to ourselves, and
to the whole» (Toulmin, 272).
Our
relation to the transcendent God is the reconciliation seen m Jesus» freedom
to live for
others Our
relation to God, whose transcendence is reconciliation seen in Jesus» freedom
to live for
others
is not a «religious» relationship
to the highest, most powerful, and best Being imaginable — that is not authentic transcendence — but our
relation to God is a new
life in «existence for
others», through participation in the being of Jesus.
When we really allow ourselves
to feel the
relations that constitute our being, we will be closer both
to other people and
to the rest of the
living world.
However, if these enemies prove themselves
to not want
to live in peace with their Jewish neighbors, and they engage in criminal acts against Jews (or
others), then justice requires that they be fought and no further
relations be sought with them.
Whereas Paul described his former
life in Judaism as focused on human relationships with his contemporaries and predecessors, his depiction of his new
life is so centered on his
relation to God that he as yet has no relationship
to the
other apostles.
This upheaval can at first find no
other expression than the religious, for before man creates new
life forms, he creates a new
relation to life itself, a new meaning of
life.
The physical prehension as conformal feeling, we have said, reproduces the object by assuming the subjective form of one of its prehensions, but as vector it is, and remains throughout the «
life» of the subject, an essential
relation to that individual object as
other, as there and then.
For Heidegger, as perhaps for no
other philosopher, the distinction between
life and thought has meaning only if one perceives Heidegger's philosophy itself as self - confuting: So, the task is left
to me, an outsider,
to raise what may really be the quintessential Heideggerian question: the
relation of his
life to his thought.
If we integrate the studies so that their
relations to each
other are presented as true as in fact they are, then the student is more likely
to be able individually
to diversify from the stream of conformity, as he or she makes the connection between the integrated curriculum and
life.
It seems the most likely scenario is that he married his sister or less likely his niece.The reasoning is that Adam and Eve
lived alot longer and continued
to have sons and daughters GEN5: 4 aCTS 17:26 Paul tells us that the God who made the world hath made of one blood all nations of man
to dwell on all the face of the earth.Cain did nt marry
to another tribe or nation as every man and women was a relative and of the same bloodline of Adam and Eve.The importance of this is that sin entered through one man Adam and is past through the bloodline so redemption is only possible through the same bloodline.So for the formula
to work the human genome had
to stay the same no
other tribes or nations just the descendents of Adam and Eve.It also solves another riddle in that satan at various times prior
to the flood and after the flood tried
to contaminate the bloodline by his angels having sexual
relations with the women this created a type of alien in essence and would have not been able
to have been redeemed by the blood of Jesus as it wasnt fully human.This is where the giants came from and why God wanted
to destroy them as they had the potential
to destroy the human race as they couldnt be redeemed by the blood of Jesus.Interesting?
As Christopher Lasch also points out, new therapies» solutions are tautological, self - defeating
to the extent that they advise people «not
to make too large an investment in love and friendship,
to avoid excessive independence on
others, and
to live for the moment — the very conditions that created the crisis of personal
relations in the first place» (New York Review of Books [September 30, 1976]-RRB-.
The
relation between personal autonomy and the being of the world as a whole becomes apparent
to most people as they recognize it in the
lives of certain
other people.
Blacks
lived in their own neighborhoods, went
to their own churches, and generally interacted only with
other blacks save for the new (but still tight) pattern of hierarchical
relations.
Judge made the biggest mistake of his
life to let that mosque
to be built.and problem is that people will pay heavily for that decision.Islam is the source of problem, Koran is the source problem.They use our freedom of religion, they sneak in cities under the name of peace and love then they strike hard, though
other religions have no rights in their contries.Here is statement from Omar Ahmed chairman of the Board of council on America Islamic
Relation:» Islam isn't in America
to be equal
to any
other faith, but
to become dominant.The Quran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth «Does this sounds
to you religionf peace, love and logic?or terrorist thresd for thr future?
Whitehead's fundamental
relation of prehension is something broader and more elemental, the generally unconscious emotional feeling by which one bit of
life responds
to other realities.
For the subject - object
relation is an assertion of ego, one's ordering the world about his subjective, personal consciousness, and as such it offers a handhold
to all of the invidious evaluations that separate men from things, from each
other, and from their own deepest
life itself.
Of course, an existentialist interpretation does not ignore this
other relation, but, as Bultmann's essay shows, the importance of the world in that interpretation is limited
to providing the stage for human
life.
«At the beginning and end of all our ways is One in whose steadfast will and purpose there is indeed no shadow of turning and in whom all our confidences have their unshakable foundation... In his inmost actuality he is «pure unbounded love», pure personal
relation to others, who has no
other cause than the ever more abundant
life of the creatures of his love.
The problem of evolutionary determinism is often brought up in
relation to the hypothetical extraterrestrial
life on hypothetical planets in
other solar systems.
He did not understand the spiritual
life as an ascetical exercise of self - negation that had no
relation to justice in society and
to love of the
other even beyond the demands of justice.
This meant that it was given meanings and placed in
relation with
other elements of experience according
to principles of association and interpretation spontaneously generated in the unconscious
life independently of pragmatic value.
Participation in these calls as structures and in and though particular locations provides a sense of identity for selves, enables each
to have meaning in
relation to their and
others»
lives, and
to be a location for satisfying engagements not always pleasing or delightful or fun.
In addition
to these topics, participants will also consider how friendship — as a type of love — stands in
relation to other forms of love as well as how friendship can animate the best human
life or corrupt it.
In fact, some would say that there is no human value or goodness unless this value pattern is exemplified in our activities; that the capacity
to realize this structure of
relations in our
lives (
to a greater extent than can the
other animals) is what largely constitutes our humanity.
It is difficult
to see how, if God's relationship
to the world is «wholly
other» than the
relation of creative spirit
to its actual working in time (chronos), we can avoid discounting the Christian significance of creative effort, patient workmanship, and that careful assessment of conditions and consequences which make up so large a part of the wisdom of
life.
He is the one whose
life and message are central
to our understanding of God and reality, the one whose teaching gives direction
to our
lives, and the one whose example of love and right
relation and concern for
others informs our attitudes and actions.
The
life of all nations must be animated by the divine traits of moral responsibility, authenticity or integrity, loyalty or love, and creativity in
relation to all of their own members and
to other nations as well.
As soon as we free ourselves from thinking of two levels of Trinity, one inner and the
other outer, then we can see again that there is but one
life of the triune God, and that
life includes God's
relation to us
Justice is the «harmonious
relation of
life to life» as this harmonious
relation is determined by concern for
other persons in agape love.
The teacher's approach
to such problems might start from three assumptions: (a) the teacher should be concerned with how science fits into the larger framework of
life, and the student should raise questions about the meaning of what he studies and its
relation to other fields; (b) controversial questions can be treated, not in a spirit of indoctrination, but with an emphasis on asking questions and helping students think through assumptions and implications; an effort should be made
to present viewpoints
other than one's own as fairly as possible, respecting the integrity of the student by avoiding undue imposition of the lecturer's beliefs; (c) presuppositions inevitably enter the classroom presentation of many subjects, so that a viewpoint frankly and explicitly recognized may be less dangerous than one which is hidden and assumed not
to exist.
His duty is
to so direct his own affairs and so
to have regard for all
other creatures as
to develop a future in which there is peace not only between man and man but between man and animal and between man and the whole delicate system of
relations that makes the earth a cradle of
life.
But I agree with you and Sheila that for many «no believing» is often a much more genuine response
to life and allows them
to live in deeper
relations to others — it all depends on what they are not believing.
Then we fail
to be what we are meant
to be, and we fail also
to live this out in our
relations with
others.
Faith and its opposite Unbelief presuppose a universal spiritual dimension of human selfhood in which the self sees itself as poised between the world and God i.e. at once as an integral part of the world of matter and the community of
life governed by the mechanical and organic laws of development respectively on the one hand, and having a limited power
to transcend these laws through its spiritual
relation to the transcendent realm of God's purpose on the
other.
The interpretation of the present nature of human beings in any situation, as «made in the image of God» and as «brothers for whom Christ died» should be as Persons - in -
Relation and destined
to become Persons - in - Loving - Community with each
other in the context of the community of
life on earth through the responsible exercise of the finite human freedom reconciled
to God.
It appears also as a nationalism in which man is taught
to live and die for his own race or country as the ultimate worthful reality, and which requires the promotion of national power and glory at the expense of
other nations as well as of the individuals with their own direct
relation to the eternal.