In his book, Man and His Symbols, psychoanalyst Carl Jung (1964) discussed the value of symbols in
relation to human existence.
The second point of general agreement, which becomes disagreement in the details, is the nature of God's action in
relation to human existence.
It does take faith in evolution because that is not a repeatable experiment in
relation to human existence.
Not exact matches
Included in these (at least on the whole) are the sustaining
relations of
human existence to the
human body and, through it,
to the rest of the subhuman world.
He will not require not merely that the new knowledge be used as the foundation of the proof, but that the very spirit and atmosphere of the new knowledge enter in such a way into thedemonstration of God's
existence, that the complexities and confusions of
human thought engendered by the new knowledge shall be resolved in harmonious unity in the postulate of God's
existence, nature, and
relation to created being.
It is a drama that unfolds in several contexts at once: within the historical context of a «great cloud of witnesses», that is, in relationship
to all of those who speak (and have spoken) as «Christian preachers»; within the context of the speaker's own
human existence in
relation to other statements of faith collected as «Christian theology» within the time and space set aside for the performance of Christian liturgy.
> It is entering into
relation that makes man really man; it is the failure
to enter into
relation that in the last analysis constitutes evil, or non-
existence; and it is the re-establishment of
relation that leads
to the redemption of evil and genuine
human existence.
One may understand the personality of God as His act — it is, indeed, even permissible for the believer
to believe that God became a person for love of him, because in our
human mode of
existence the only reciprocal
relation with us that exists is a personal one.
The Corporeal Nature of Freedom and its Sphere Before speaking of the
existence of freedom and in freedom something will have
to be said about the specifically
human creatureliness of freedom which will clarify the dialectical character of our
relation to our own and other people's freedom.
If in the Old Testament, in Judaism, and in the New Testament, the unworldly takes the form of a future hope, of eschata — «last things» in the traditional sense — that is only one among other possible conceptions of man's
relation to the unworldly, though no doubt it enshrines a genuine insight into
human existence, namely that from a
human perspective the eschaton can only be future.
So far our comments have been largely a contrast of stances toward
human existence: a plea for a more truly dialectical, less dualistic understanding of the
relation between form and energy, a plea for a similar openness toward the past, a question about the future
to the effect that the incompleteness of the present ought not
to frustrate Dr. Altizer into insisting that the total reversal promised by the glimpsed eschatological future be the only standard or norm of faith.
To understand what is peculiar to the Buddhist structure of existence, it was necessary to concentrate attention on the relation of each dominant occasion of human experience to the predecessor and successor occasion together with which it constituted a sou
To understand what is peculiar
to the Buddhist structure of existence, it was necessary to concentrate attention on the relation of each dominant occasion of human experience to the predecessor and successor occasion together with which it constituted a sou
to the Buddhist structure of
existence, it was necessary
to concentrate attention on the relation of each dominant occasion of human experience to the predecessor and successor occasion together with which it constituted a sou
to concentrate attention on the
relation of each dominant occasion of
human experience
to the predecessor and successor occasion together with which it constituted a sou
to the predecessor and successor occasion together with which it constituted a soul.
With their understanding of the divine -
human nature of Jesus Christ and of the ubiquity of Christ in all compassionate and needy companions, Christians are led
to see that as the neighbor can not exist or be known or be valued without the
existence, knowledge and love of God, so also God does not exist as God - for - us or become known or loved as God except in his and our
relation to the neighbor.
This is clear enough from the foregoing theological reflections on the
relation between faith and justice; for whatever else faith and justice may be said
to be, they have been shown
to be possibilities of
human existence, whose metaphysical implications necessarily include claims about the reality of the self such as properly belong
to metaphysical psychology.
According
to the Christian witness, faith is the kind of basic
human attitude or disposition that can be formally characterized as an existential self - understanding, or understanding of our own
existence, in
relation to others and
to the encompassing whole of ultimate reality.
I - lick has argued that if the
existence of an omnipotent creator were clear
to human beings, it would be so obvious that we should obey God's will that we would not really be free in
relation to God.
Yet in many ways the feminist call for change was even more radical, since
relations between men and women are fundamental
to all
human existence.
«We are united in believing that there needs
to be respect for the
existence of different intellectually coherent viewpoints in
relation to the
human rights debate, and in believing that the debate needs
to be well informed and not distorted by the stereotypes and caricatures that have all too often characterised it in recent years.»
As the world is becoming more international in its
relations, that is an increasingly less realistic goal, even though it can not be denied that the idea carries a lot of appeal
to modern
humans as their behavior and decision - making has evolved in tribal contexts over most of their biological
existence.
These objects are seen as extensions of
human beings, their
existence establishing the duality of presence and absence in
relation to a
human body.
Incorporating a symbolic figurative presence as an alternative
to the external appearance of a
human figure — a traditional marker of our
existence — these works locate the body through spaces, materials, sensations, and information that exist in
relation to it (and
to us).
This mercurial image of the hare has come
to stand as surrogate for
human existence and our
relations to the animal world.