Sentences with phrase «relation to other men»

Of course men can benefit from assertion training too, particularly in relation to other men and to their jobs.

There is much that is of permanent validity, not only in the words of Jesus but in the rest of the New Testament, as to how a Christian should act in relation to other men.

However, the philosophy of dialogue limits their competence to judge the essence of man as a whole in relation to other men.

Not exact matches

The other need for further development concerns the relation of second - person praise spoken to God and third - person philosophical reflection about God and man.

The wisdom the man needs now involves his relation to this powerful other.

For some it may mean that «there is an orphaned state required for the sake of the kingdom of heaven, in which a man who like all others is the child of his parents must symbolize with his being and action the present but hidden creation which is not a mere prolongation of the old, but the new creation in relation to which the old has already passed away...» This is, therefore, the first word that must be spoken: of discontinuity between the kingdom of God and any earthly order, even one as significant as the family.

In other words, the only adequate basis for right relations of men with God is an inward and personal understanding of His demands, an inward and personal response to them.

They have simply lost interest in metaphysical claims about Jesus, viewing him as a «man for others» or a «free man» in relation to whom we can become free.

Another attempts to assimilate the Christian with the revolutionary vocabulary: «Revolution restores the relation of man to man; it is a transformation of life, a renewal, a regeneration, a new life» — in other words, the equivalent of conversion.

Nor need we dismiss as empty illusion the hopes of men of other religions who have trusted in God, or the gods, to renew, after death, a relation of grace and communion with their servants.

The present volume is really a collection of studies, and it might easily have grown to twice its size if other topics had been included: for example the miracle stories — I should have liked to examine Alan Richardson's new book on The Miracle - Stories of the Gospels (1942)-- or a fuller study of the so - called messianic consciousness of Jesus, the theory of interim ethics, the relation of eschatology and ethics in Jesus» teachings — see Professor Amos N. Wilder's book on the subject, Eschatology and Ethics in the Teaching of Jesus (1939)-- the influence of the Old Testament upon the earliest interpretation of the life of Jesus — see Professor David E. Adams» new book, Man of God (1941), and Professor E. W. K. Mould's The World - View of Jesus (1941)-- or sonic of the topics treated in the new volume of essays presented to Professor William Jackson Lowstuter, New Testament Studies (1942), edited by Professor Edwin Prince Booth.

The code of laws provides the regulations which create the proper relations between man and God, such as saying prayers, fasting, and other religious duties; they guide man in his relations with his brother in Islam or the non-Muslim community, in organizing the structure of the family and encouraging reciprocal affection; they lead man to an understanding of his place in the universe, encouraging research into the nature of man and animals and guiding man in the use of the benefits of the natural world.

The classic anthropological picture, largely drawn from the study of primitive societies, of tightly - woven patterns of culture, each element of which has to be understood in relation to all the other interconnected elements, is decreasingly relevant to the understanding of man - in - relation.

Be that about men - women relations, relations to other religions and those who are religion - free or any number of other subjects.

But violence always breaks and corrupts the relation of men to each other.

Man is not to be «seen through» but «to be perceived ever more completely in his openness and his hiddenness and in the relation of the two to each other.»

These last two terms mean basically the same thing: that to marry creates a real legal relationship, with specific rights and obligations between a woman and a man: in relation to each other, to society, and to God.

Too often those most interested in the nature of the Christian faith have been those least interested in its relation to men [sic] of other faiths.»

This upheaval can at first find no other expression than the religious, for before man creates new life forms, he creates a new relation to life itself, a new meaning of life.

To this useful image Marian Evans contrasts Dr. Cumming's God, who «instead of sharing and aiding our human sympathies is directly in collision with them; who instead of strengthening the bond between man and man, by encouraging the sense that they are both alike the objects of His love and care, thrusts himself between them and forbids them to feel for each other except as they have relation to Him.&raquTo this useful image Marian Evans contrasts Dr. Cumming's God, who «instead of sharing and aiding our human sympathies is directly in collision with them; who instead of strengthening the bond between man and man, by encouraging the sense that they are both alike the objects of His love and care, thrusts himself between them and forbids them to feel for each other except as they have relation to Him.&raquto feel for each other except as they have relation to Him.&raquto Him.»

It seems the most likely scenario is that he married his sister or less likely his niece.The reasoning is that Adam and Eve lived alot longer and continued to have sons and daughters GEN5: 4 aCTS 17:26 Paul tells us that the God who made the world hath made of one blood all nations of man to dwell on all the face of the earth.Cain did nt marry to another tribe or nation as every man and women was a relative and of the same bloodline of Adam and Eve.The importance of this is that sin entered through one man Adam and is past through the bloodline so redemption is only possible through the same bloodline.So for the formula to work the human genome had to stay the same no other tribes or nations just the descendents of Adam and Eve.It also solves another riddle in that satan at various times prior to the flood and after the flood tried to contaminate the bloodline by his angels having sexual relations with the women this created a type of alien in essence and would have not been able to have been redeemed by the blood of Jesus as it wasnt fully human.This is where the giants came from and why God wanted to destroy them as they had the potential to destroy the human race as they couldnt be redeemed by the blood of Jesus.Interesting?

; and (4) pastoral nurture of men and women to fulfill their God - given vocations in relation to each other.

The assumption that women are not really related to other women, the absence of understanding men in relationship to women, the refusal to acknowledge the homo - relational basis of heteroreality, the ignorance of connectedness with nature all attest to the relational naivete of hetero - reality in comparison with a worldview based upon internal relations.

Perhaps the kinds of studies that have been made of the art of administration, of the relations of policy and administration, of organization and management in other: spheres will be carried forward into the sphere of the Church and may show how much the pastoral director of our time, as pastoral preacher, teacher, counselor and leader of worship has also become the democratic pastoral administrator, that is to say, a man charged with the responsibility and given the authority to hold in balance, to invigorate and to maintain communication among a host of activities and their responsible leaders, all directed toward a common end.

In other words, the existentialist interpretation of myth provides the clue to only one aspect of the relation and the gulf between God and man, but it can not do justice to the wonder of its full range and depth.

The dynamic glory of the being of man is first bodily present in the relation between two men each of whom in meaning the other also means the highest to which this person is called and serves the fulfillment of this created destiny without wishing to impose anything of his own realization on the other.

Modern man is sick in his very soul, and this sickness springs, in its turn, from his sickness in his relations to others.

This distance given, man is able to enter into relation with other beings or, as we have seen, he is able to enlarge, develop, accentuate, and shape the distance itself.

For the subject - object relation is an assertion of ego, one's ordering the world about his subjective, personal consciousness, and as such it offers a handhold to all of the invidious evaluations that separate men from things, from each other, and from their own deepest life itself.

«For the inmost growth of the self is not accomplished, as people like to suppose today, in man's relation to himself, but... in the making present of another self and in the knowledge that one is made present in his own self by the other.»

He relates to men not as independently other beings but as to things, things moreover with which he will never enter into relation and which he is eager to rob of their distance.

But as long as the basic self - centeredness of feeling was taken for granted, man's primary attention could be directed away from himself toward others and toward his relations to them.

And yet, as others were quick to point out, no one doubts the love of men for men, or women for women, just as no one doubts that there may be abiding relations of love between brothers and sisters, or grandparents and grandchildren.

That is, we can see that the ground of his strange behavior and stories was his conviction that God's Kingdom was breaking in, that the decision each man made in relation to that Kingdom set aside all other considerations.

Because this happening discloses what is most essential for our understanding of reality, it enjoys an importance in human thought and behavior that sets it apart from all other happenings, for it is precisely in relation to the real that man finds fulfilment in his own being.

If in the Old Testament, in Judaism, and in the New Testament, the unworldly takes the form of a future hope, of eschata — «last things» in the traditional sense — that is only one among other possible conceptions of man's relation to the unworldly, though no doubt it enshrines a genuine insight into human existence, namely that from a human perspective the eschaton can only be future.

His duty is to so direct his own affairs and so to have regard for all other creatures as to develop a future in which there is peace not only between man and man but between man and animal and between man and the whole delicate system of relations that makes the earth a cradle of life.

If we substitute «Jesus Christ» for «neighbor» Christians in general will accept that statement; but there is danger in that substitution as well as the possibility of enlightenment, since the relation of Jesus Christ to our other neighbors is often obscured in theology; his revelation of what it means to be a man is often forgotten in favor of exclusive attention to his disclosure of what it means that God is, and is Good.

It appears also as a nationalism in which man is taught to live and die for his own race or country as the ultimate worthful reality, and which requires the promotion of national power and glory at the expense of other nations as well as of the individuals with their own direct relation to the eternal.

To understand man means to know his various abilities (Kräfte), their modifications, their relation to each other and to external circumstanceTo understand man means to know his various abilities (Kräfte), their modifications, their relation to each other and to external circumstanceto know his various abilities (Kräfte), their modifications, their relation to each other and to external circumstanceto each other and to external circumstanceto external circumstances.

Christians hold that the original state of man and woman vis - a-vis each other was one of joyous harmony: particularly in relation to their reciprocal sexuality with its potential for mutual appreciation and enrichment, and for unitive and fruitful love.

Thus, although man — like all the other mammals — experiences lust without realizing its connection to generation of offspring, the character of his lusting would certainly be conditioned by its relation to that outcome or goal.

We would preach by our example the respect of superiors and equals, the respect of all men; affectionate simplicity in our relations with inferiors and insignificant persons; indulgence where our own claims only are concerned, but firmness in our demands where they relate to duties towards others or towards the public.

In the relations of a man and woman who love each other with passion and imagination and tenderness, there is something of inestimable value, to be ignorant of which is a great misfortune to any human being» (p. 74).

That one man was reasonable and the other stupid is a difference between these two men; it is a difference, however, which has no significance in relation to the fact that both, whatever their individual differences, are going in the wrong direction!

- The American Indians are descended from Jews who sailed to America in 600BC - God is a flesh and blood man and had physical relations with Mary to create Jesus - Jesus and Satan are brothers - Mormon men can become gods and live on their own planet - Joseph Smith met God and Jesus in person, and God told him all other Christian faiths were an «abomination» - Joseph Smith used magic glasses and his magic treasure seeking hat to create the Book of Mormon

20 But if you have gone astray while married to your husband and you have made yourself impure by having se.xual relations with a man other than your husband» — 21 here the priest is to put the woman under this curse — «may the Lord cause you to become a curse among your people when he makes your womb miscarry and your abdomen swell.

As Copernicus had initiated a fundamental change in the view of the place of the earth in the solar system so these men, and others, were helping to bring about a change in man's views of himself, his origin and ancestry, and his relations to his fellow men.

The sermon could have done the same thing if it had taken the live issues of this man's life or some other man's life, and used them dialogically in relation to the passage from Corinthians.

«During all this time I was never joined in profession of religion with any, but gave up myself to the Lord, having forsaken all evil company, taking leave of father and mother, and all other relations, and traveled up and down as a stranger on the earth, which way the Lord inclined my heart; taking a chamber to myself in the town where I came, and tarrying sometimes more, sometimes less in a place: for I durst not stay long in a place, being afraid both of professor and profane, lest, being a tender young man, I should be hurt by conversing much with either.