Not exact matches
a) Steele was suspended and then terminated as an FBI source for what the FBI defines as the most serious of violations — an unauthorized
disclosure to the media of his
relationship with the FBI in an October 30, 2016, Mother Jones article
by David Corn.
While companies have different rules about
relationships between employees — some prohibit them, while others require
disclosure — Uber is in a dicey spot right now and any revelations of an out - of - control company culture, especially
by top execs, are problematic at this time.
The fiduciary agreement should stress and clarify that your advisor / advisee
relationship is always one defined
by transparency and
disclosure.
A man,
by contrast, thinks that a woman should evidence a concern for him and their
relationship by initiating the process of her self -
disclosure.
Revelation is the
disclosure of the self - humbling of God and with it the promise of ultimate reconciliation and unity that arises out of the unbrokenness of the love that gives itself away completely and
by doing so manifests itself as the ground of all life and
relationship.
Without the possibility of non-coercive self -
disclosure, which is vitiated
by unfettered intrusion, such
relationships are fatuous.
Their biggest benefactor, Mayor Bloomberg, wants full
disclosure of teacher data, but they've long had a close
relationship with NYSUT — though less publicized than the one enjoyed
by the Dems.
The guidelines, which largely match
disclosure rules approved
by the county legislature, require vendors to provide details about contributions to Nassau officials, any
relationships with elected officials or county employees, the use of lobbyists and the firm's incorporation date.
Obviously, without such
disclosure lawyer - legislators could easily hide business
relationships in which the legislator is enriching him or herself
by having clients with business before the government.
All Science Journals require manuscripts to be accompanied
by clear
disclosures from all authors of any past and present affiliations, funding sources, and financial or management
relationships related to the reported research that might raise questions about possible sources of bias.
FULL
DISCLOSURE POLICY AFFECTING CME ACTIVITIES As a provider approved by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Office of Continuing Medical Education (OCME) requires attested and signed global disclosure of the existence of all financial interests or relationships with commercial interest from any individual in a position to control the content of a CME activity sponsore
DISCLOSURE POLICY AFFECTING CME ACTIVITIES As a provider approved
by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Office of Continuing Medical Education (OCME) requires attested and signed global
disclosure of the existence of all financial interests or relationships with commercial interest from any individual in a position to control the content of a CME activity sponsore
disclosure of the existence of all financial interests or
relationships with commercial interest from any individual in a position to control the content of a CME activity sponsored
by OCME.
Any such business
relationships with said companies will be accompanied
by a link to http://cmp.ly in accordance with The Federal Trade Commission's
disclosure guidelines for bloggers beginning in December 2009.
If, as a cooking influencer or blogger, you have been approached
by a brand to include their product in your cookbook, make sure that you disclose your
relationship the brand so that you comply with FTC
disclosure requirements.
If either you or we choose or elect arbitration of any claim, dispute, or controversy, (which may be without the other's consent), any claim, dispute or controversy
by either you or us against the other (or against the employees, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, beneficiaries, agents or assigns of the other) arising from or relating in any way to your Account, transactions on your Account, our
relationship, this Agreement or any provisions of this Agreement, any prior Agreement, any
disclosures, advertising, or application (hereafter «Claim» or «Claims»), including Claims regarding the applicability or validity of this arbitration clause, shall be resolved exclusively and finally
by binding arbitration.
In general, the annual percentage yield for account
disclosures under § § 230.4 and 230.5 and for advertising under § 230.8 is an annualized rate that reflects the
relationship between the amount of interest that would be earned
by the consumer for the term of the account and the amount of principal used to calculate that interest.
The purpose behind these guidelines is to promote (i) honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional
relationships; (ii) full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable
disclosure in reports and documents that the Trust files with, or submits to, the SEC and in other public communications made
by the Funds; (iii) compliance with applicable governmental laws, rule and regulations; (iv) the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Trust Code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Trust Code; and (v) accountability for adherence to the Trust Code.
For the uninitiated, the new
disclosures are part of the so - called CRM II (the second phase of the Client
Relationship Model put forward
by Canadian securities regulators).
LendEDU analyzes each private student loan provider using the following criteria: communication process with consumers and / or required cosigner, ease of use when applying, clarity of necessary
disclosures, availability of 24/7 customer support staff, availability of customer support channels including but not limited to email, phone, fax, and text, competitiveness of interest rates offered at a high level and at a credit profile level, wide variety of terms available, non-financial benefits and services offered, incentives for responsible borrowing, tools to promote educated repayment,
relationships with servicing companies, availability of a soft credit check process, experience industry executives, track record of excellent consumer happiness, values upheld
by the institutions, and timeline for funding process.
While such a
relationship is not inherently a cause for concern, the lack of
disclosure in the articles written
by Mr. Tyler Wilde at PC Gamer while covering Ubisoft games and press releases reveals once again that the often lampooned call for «better ethics in gaming media» has a long way to go before any kind of universal transparency can be reached.
«My colleagues and I can not perform our duties if research or testimony provided to us is influenced
by undisclosed financial
relationships,» Grijalva wrote in his letters, which ask for financial
disclosures and information on research grants.
(a) A lawyer shall not reveal information protected
by the attorney - client privilege under applicable law or other information gained in the professional
relationship that the client has requested be held inviolate or the
disclosure of which would be embarrassing or would be likely to be detrimental to the client unless the client consents after consultation, except for
disclosures that are impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation, and except as stated in paragraphs (b) and (c).
That prohibition exists to protect «a person who has chosen to be represented
by a lawyer in a matter against possible overreaching
by other lawyers who are participating in the matter, interference
by those lawyers with the client - lawyer
relationship and the uncounselled
disclosure of information relating to the representation.»
The allegations arose five years after the end of the
relationship,
by way of
disclosure to a caregiver at a time when the child was under the care of the CAS.
To ensure the court gives proper consideration to such documents on the breakdown of a
relationship, they need to be accurately drafted and legal advice is imperative at the outset, together with evidence that full
disclosure has been presented
by both parties.
Clients represented
by pool counsel may mistake the nature of their
relationship with one another in the context of the matter and assume that
disclosures they make to others represented
by the same lawyer are protected.
(d) The
relationship between lawyers or judges acting on behalf of a judges or lawyers assistance program approved
by the Supreme Court, and lawyers or judges who have agreed to seek assistance from and participate in any such programs, shall be considered one of attorney and client, with its attendant duty of confidentiality and privilege from
disclosure.
The construction of the final rule clarifies that the provision of the specified services gives rise to a business associate
relationship if the performance of the service involves
disclosure of protected health information
by the covered entity to the business associate.
Disclosure is permissible in very limited cases including: (i) the written consent of the client or the written consent of the rightful owner of the confidential information is obtained; (ii) an express court judgement ordered such
disclosure is obtained and only to the extent needed
by the court; or (iii) if the attorney, his partners or employees are accused of a criminal charge or a civil claim arising from the
relationship with the client or a negligence or professional misconduct.
Data aggregation is a service that gives rise to a business associate
relationship if the performance of the service involves
disclosure of protected health information
by the covered entity to the business associate.
By allowing covered entities, in the exercise of professional judgment, to determine whether such
disclosures are in the individual's best interests, the final rule recognizes the importance of the provider - patient
relationship.
In this example, the relevant
disclosures of protected health information
by any covered health care provider with a direct treatment
relationship with the patient would be permitted subject to the general consent requirements of § 164.506.
We proposed to require authorizations requested
by individuals to contain a minimum set of elements: a description of the information to be used or disclosed; the name of the covered entity, or class of entities or persons, authorized to make the use or
disclosure; the name or types of recipient (s) of the information; an expiration date; the individual's signature and date of signature; if signed
by a representative, a description of the representative's authority or
relationship to the individual; a statement regarding the individual's right to revoke the authorization; and a statement that the information may no longer be protected
by the federal privacy law.
You agree not to post User Content that: (i) may create a risk of harm, loss, physical or mental injury, emotional distress, death, disability, disfigurement, or physical or mental illness to you, to any other person, or to any animal; (ii) may create a risk of any other loss or damage to any person or property; (iii) seeks to harm or exploit children
by exposing them to inappropriate content, asking for personally identifiable details or otherwise; (iv) may constitute or contribute to a crime or tort; (v) contains any information or content that we deem to be unlawful, harmful, abusive, racially or ethnically offensive, defamatory, infringing, invasive of personal privacy or publicity rights, harassing, humiliating to other people (publicly or otherwise), libelous, threatening, profane, obscene, or otherwise objectionable; (vi) contains any information or content that is illegal (including, without limitation, the
disclosure of insider information under securities law or of another party's trade secrets); (vii) contains any information or content that you do not have a right to make available under any law or under contractual or fiduciary
relationships; or (viii) contains any information or content that you know is not correct and current.
Some months ago the New York Times ran a story about a study
by psychologist Arthur Aron, which held that «sustained, escalating, reciprocal, personal self -
disclosure» deepened
relationships.
On the other hand, such intimate
disclosures might come with the risk of divulging too much or being rejected
by the partner, which could result in less
relationship happiness.
Despite the historical significance of Attachment Theory (e.g., refuting Freudian claims; challenging behaviorism), coverage in Social Psychology textbooks is usually limited to the prototypical descriptions
by Bartholomew and Horowitz (1991) and connections to other aspects of
relationships, such as the modes of self -
disclosure by each attachment style (Collins & Freeney, 2004; Mashek & Sherman, 2004).
The therapist may «move» to «quash» or eliminate the subpoena if the therapist fears the therapeutic
relationship would be compromised
by disclosure of information, or if it is not clear who will be paying the therapist for his or her time.
Future research is needed to fully understand how discrepancies in negative or maladaptive aspects of mother — child
relationships are formed (e.g., low
disclosure), are understood
by the members of the dyad, and contribute to the onset, maintenance, and treatment of problematic behavioral outcomes.
If you are dealing with a consumer who is not accompanied
by a licensee, you must make the
disclosure required under section 5 - 10 — even if that consumer is currently in a client
relationship with a licensee.
287 DOS 98 Matter of DOS v. Uqdah Realty & Management Corp. — deposits; jurisdiction; fraudulent practices; failure to pay judgment; vicarious liability; notary public;
disclosure of agency
relationship; broker violated 19 NYCRR 175.1 when he deposited escrow funds into his operating account; broker committed conversion when his operating account fell below deposit amount; broker engaged in fraudulent practices when he illegally retained buyer's trust funds and attempted to qualify prospective buyer for mortgage
by falsely stating their employment; broker failed to disclose his agency
relationship to his client; failure to pay judgment; corporate real estate broker vicariously liable and charged with actual knowledge of violation of law because of representative broker's cognizant misconduct as corporate officer; broker is not required to deposit a refundable commission in an escrow account unless contractually demanded; corporate broker and representative broker's license revoked; restitution of deposit of $ 12,000 plus interest; notary public commission revoked based on misconduct as a real estate licensee
730 DOS 02 DOS v. New World Realty of New York, Inc. — availing of license; deposits;
disclosure of agency
relationships; duty to supervise sales associates; failure to pay judgment; proper business practices; DOS has jurisdiction where disciplinary action was started while individual was licensed as an associate broker and was eligible to automatically renew at the time of the disciplinary hearing; salesperson owned voting stock in licensed corporate real estate broker, failed to pay judgment and failed to present evidence of inability to do so, and engaged in unlicensed activity after license expired; representative broker availed corporate real estate brokers license to salesperson; representative broker failed to properly supervise salesperson
by permitting and authorizing salesperson to act as a real estate broker; broker and salesperson failed to make agency
disclosures and failed to deposit funds of principal in a special bank account; real estate transaction conducted was a fraudulent business practice; DOS fails to prove the unauthorized practice of law; salesperson's license revoked and salesperson ordered to pay refund of $ 1,406.00 of illegal commission collected; representative broker's license revoked and broker ordered to refund $ 74.00 of illegal commission collected; representative broker fined $ 5,000.00
321 DOS 00 DOS v. Kerr - deposits; failure to appear at hearing; failure to pay judgment;
disclosure of agency
relationships; material misstatement on application; failure to cooperate with DOS investigation; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proper notice; broker fails to provide RPL § 443 agency
disclosure notice to landlord / client prior to entering into listing agreement; broker commits conversion upon exercising unauthorized right of ownership over rental deposits and payments collected on behalf of principal; failure to satisfy judgment is demonstration of untrustworthiness unless broker presents valid evidence of inability to pay; failure to respond to DOS request letter constitutes failure to cooperate; material misstatement on application
by denying prior license suspension; broker's license revoked
887 DOS 03 DOS v. Bravo - deposits;
disclosure of agency
relationships; failure to cooperate with DOS investigation; proper business practices; vicarious liability; broker failed to provide agency
disclosure form; broker continued to do business under prior firm's name after association with that firm had been terminated; broker failed to deposit monies received
by her into an escrow account; broker failed to respond to DOS letters; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency
by failing to follow up on the availability of an apartment in a rental transaction; broker failed to give a cash refund of a deposit received in cash upon tenant's demand therefore; corporate broker bound
by the knowledge acquired
by its representative broker; corporate broker's license and representative broker's license suspended for six months
Section 5 - 8 (1)(a) is amended
by striking out «except for
disclosure under section 5 - 10 (b)[
disclosure of representation and
relationship in trading services] of these rules,».
649 DOS 02 DOS v. Holzbach —
disclosure of agency
relationships; proper business practices; sanctions; unauthorized practice of law; vicarious liability; broker fails to timely provide agency
disclosure form to buyer although
disclosure form could have been faxed to and received from buyer; broker back dated agency
disclosure form demonstrating incompetency; use of designated agent form without the use of required agency
disclosure form pursuant to RPL § 443 (4); use of «removal of contingency» addendum to contract which did not contain an attorney approval clause and was not on a form jointly approved
by the County Bar Association and REALTOR Association constituted the unauthorized practice of law; corporate broker liable for the acts of its representative broker; proper to impose a higher fine after hearing than that which was offered in settlement (joint fine of $ 2,000.00 offered); associate broker fined $ 2,000.00, representative broker fined $ 1,000.00, and corporate broker fined $ 2,000.00
199 DOS 98 Matter of DOS v. Wheeler — due process; failure to appear at hearing; failure to cooperate with DOS investigation; deposits; proper business practices; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; broker improperly conducted business under name other than that on his licensed as evidenced
by signs indicating a different name; broker fails to provide agency
disclosure form to buyer prior to entering into agency
relationship; broker failed to deliver duplicate original of instrument to client; broker commingled funds
by depositing deposit check into operating account; untrustworthiness demonstrated
by failure to return deposit when offer not accepted; failure to comply with DOS investigation; broker's license revoked
79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano -
disclosure of agency
relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency
disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency
disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24
by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients
by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller
by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited
by buyer as such forfeiture clause could,
by its terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended
by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness
by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish
by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound
by the knowledge acquired
by and is responsible for acts committed
by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained
Also, Realtors can be somewhat limited
by certain legal and ethical standards that would not apply to a non-licensed investor — like the required
disclosure of the license itself or respecting other agents» implied agency
relationships.
However, if Eileen or her brokerage have been engaged
by Dave to provide real estate services in the intervening period or they have an ongoing client
relationship with Dave,
disclosure of this referral fee, even though it was not expected, is required at the time of its receipt.
This
disclosure must be made before providing trading services so that consumers understand the nature of the
relationship being proposed
by a licensee before they begin to share confidential information with that licensee.