Sentences with phrase «relationship quality indicators»

A: I was surprised that the effects of lack of joint planning on relationship dissolution were apparent even when we accounted for various relationship quality indicators, the partners» agreement on various issues, overall goal planning, and all sorts of other things.

Not exact matches

Researchers interested in exploring the relationship between macroeconomic performance and the quality of monetary institutions should consider augmenting the Fraser and Heritage data with additional institutional indicators, such as measures of central bank independence, the use of monetary policy rules, freedom to use competing forms of money, and exchange rate regimes.

The MOR index is a reliable, patient - informed quality and safety indicator that can be applied across jurisdictions to assess the nature of provider - patient relationships, and access to person - centered care.

«But what we do see in the analysis of the data is an increase in temperatures and chlorophyll concentration across the bay and a changing relationship between nitrogen and chlorophyll — an indicator of algae growth and water quality — as those waters warm.»

The study examined the relationship between emotional intelligence and motivation to serve the public of public sector workers on the one hand and the mutual influence of these factors on three indicators of their performance: job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and the quality of service, on the other.

We see the same lack of a relationship when we instead measure instructor quality using the «conversion rate» — an indicator capturing a very different aspect of instructor quality than the value - added measure does.

No surprise, I guess, that none of the other «issues» about which the EVAAS has been continuously questioned and critiqued were addressed in this article (e.g., about fairness and the teachers who are not TVAAS eligible, validity or the lack of relationships between the TVAAS and other indicators of quality in Tennessee, subject and grade level bias, as written about here and here, etc.).

Director of Business — Duties & Responsibilities Recruit and train staff of 30 in hospital policies, procedures, best practices, and corporate branding Design and implement staff development, recognition, and disciplinary policies and procedures Oversee admissions, utilization review, PB X, imaging center, billing, collections, and wound center registrations Set and strictly adhere to departmental budgets and schedules Author and present financial reports concerning revenue, expenses, and outstanding collections Identify performance indicators and benchmarks for integration into reporting systems Conduct surveys regarding patient / staff satisfaction, benchmarks, accreditation, and employee benefits Maintain a 99 % patient satisfaction score through attentive and professional standards of care Negotiate contracts and claims with insurance carriers, Medicare, Medicaid, and other payer sources Increase revenue by 30 % through effective contract renegotiation with suppliers, carriers, and other parties Implement policies, procedures, and equipment to cut hospital costs while enhancing patient care Utilize strong management experience to drive operations in an efficient and professional manner Develop and implement billing controls, cash processing measures, lockboxes, and other financial processes Coordinate and oversee internal and external audits ensuring compliance with industry and legal standards Recruit physicians through successful marketing, networking, and other tactics Implement automated Chargemaster financial application (Craneware) and maintain patient accounts Responsible for HCAHPS and the yearly Quality Assurance Plan Appeal claims when appropriate resulting in $ 400,000 reimbursement from PPO insurance over the last year Build and strengthen professional relationship with community leaders, coworkers, and industry figures Consistently promoted for excellence in financial management, team leadership, and dedication to mission Develop working knowledge of hospital operations from patient admission to senior level strategic planning Represent company with poise, integrity, and positivity

A similar relationship was noted in the Western Australian Aboriginal Child Health Survey where an independent association between the number of dietary indicators met and a child's odds of experiencing emotional or behavioural problems was demonstrated.5 Other research with Australian adolescents has also demonstrated an association between dietary quality and mental health, even after controlling for socioeconomic status and a range of individual and family - level characteristics.41, 42 It appears that a more detailed exploration of the link between diet and mental health among Aboriginal children is warranted.

First, we examine the association between pregnancy complications and ten prenatal indicators indented to capture 1) parents» commitment prior to conception, 2) prenatal relationship quality, and 3) prenatal father involvement.

The quality of the relationship before marriage, such as during the engagement or while living together, are strong indicators of a successful marriage.

Moreover, we know from previous studies that the spousal relationship can play an important role in modifying the impact of life stressors on specific quality of life indicators (Bookwala & Franks, 2005; Choi & Marks, 2006; Mancini & Bonnano, 2006; Tower & Kasl, 1995; Tower et al., 1997).

Using vision assessed both subjectively and objectively in a national probability - based sample of adults aged 57 — 85 years, it examines the extent to which different aspects of marital quality (relationship satisfaction, supportive spouse behaviors, and free time spent with one's spouse) moderate the negative effects of poor vision on three specific indicators of quality of life: functional limitations, feelings of social isolation, and depressive symptomatology.

Marital researchers have underscored the importance of measuring different domains of marital quality (e.g., Bradbury, 1995; Bradbury et al., 2000), and prior research shows that different aspects of marriage have differential relationships to physical and mental health indicators (e.g., Bookwala, 2005; Bookwala & Franks, 2005; Bookwala & Jacobs, 2004; Umberson et al., 2006).

A significant interaction term, indicating that marital quality moderates the effects of vision on the criterion variable (Baron & Kenny, 1986), was decomposed such that simple slopes were computed and tested for the relationship between vision and the quality of life indicator for respondents scoring 1 SD above and below the mean on the moderating marital quality variable (Aiken & West, 1991).

Relational satisfaction is important because it is widely considered by relationship researchers to be a major indicator of a relationship's quality.

This finding is consistent with the meta - analysis by Amato and Gilbreth (1999) showing that when it comes to nonresident father involvement, although feelings of closeness and indicators of authoritative parenting have the strongest influence on child well - being, the effects are generally modest... Our results also reveal that the quality of the mother - child relationship has stronger, more consistent effects on adolescent well - being than the nonresident father - child relationship.

Nevertheless, none of the indicators of health or developmental problems in infancy and toddlerhood examined for this report (low birth weight, developmental delay at age 2, limiting long term illness at 10 months or age 2) is associated with the quality of the father - child relationship at age 10.

Participants» reports of indicators of the quality of the current relationship were also associated with perceived similarity.

Because perceived relationship quality and attachment security were theorized to be important indicators of stress communication behaviors (e.g., Florian, Mikulincer, & Bucholtz, 1995), the similarities of these constructs indeed imply that young people should exhibit similar support - seeking tendency across different social relationships.

Relational quality indicators and love styles as predictors of negative relational maintenance behaviors in romantic relationships.

In examining how the use of communication channels in LDR is associated with relationship outcomes, we focus on relationship satisfaction because it is a central construct studied in literature on relationships (Fincham, Rogge, & Beach, 2006), and has been highly linked to other indicators of relationship quality such as commitment, love, and relationship maintenance (e.g., Anderson & Emmers - Sommer, 2006; Hendrick, 1988) and to individual health outcomes (Proulx, Helms, & Buehler, 2007).

In fact, the quality of the bedtime routine of a married couple may indeed be an accurate indicator of the quality of their marriage relationship.

Post hoc analyses of implementation variables revealed the quality of the helping relationship as a significant indicator of treatment effects.

If measures of EE are valid indicators of the quality of staff - patient relationships, as in the case of familial research, there should be evidence of associations between high EE and staff distress or burden.47 There is no consistent evidence of associations between EE and staff stress.

This paper introduces scales on shared activity and relationship quality for married and partnered older adults using multiple indicators from the second wave of National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project.

Consistent with previous studies on marital quality, we proposed that these eight indicators reflect two dimensions of relationships quality: positive and negative (Bookwala & Franks, 2005; Fincham & Linfield, 1997; Warner & Kelley - Moore, 2012).

To construct a scale of relationship quality, we considered eight indicators of this.

To construct scales of relationship quality and shared activity, we began by selecting indicators for each scale based on previous research on positive and negative marital quality and the shared activity of social relationships.

We draw on eight indicators identified in prior research as generally corresponding to the positive and the negative aspects of relationship quality (Bookwala & Franks, 2005; Fincham & Linfield, 1997; Warner & Kelley - Moore, 2012).