Sentences with phrase «relationship quality scales»

Likewise, inquiries employing multidimensional romantic relationship quality scales are suggested.

Although some of the coefficients appear low, scales with few items often have lower reliability and previous research using similar relationship quality scales finds similar coefficients (Birditt, Fingerman, & Zarit, 2010; Fingerman et al., 2008).

Rhodes, J., Schwartz, S., Willis, M. M. & Wu, M. V. (2017) Validating a Mentoring Relationship Quality Scale: Does Match Strength Predict Match Length?

However, the evaluative Relationship Quality Scale was empirically and conceptually distinct from the more objective Shared Activities Scale.

Not exact matches

KKR's Health Care Strategic Growth strategy leverages KKR's deep health care expertise, sector relationships, track record of scaling companies, and extensive portfolio to identify and invest in businesses with innovative products or services and high - quality management teams.

To help medical billing companies scale and grow their business by performing data entry and revenue cycle management tasks through clear cut processes, open communication, good quality work, meeting / exceeding client expectations AND excellent client relationship.

Relationship quality was measured by a scale of three items tapping a child's assessment of his father's warmth, communication skill, and overall relationsRelationship quality was measured by a scale of three items tapping a child's assessment of his father's warmth, communication skill, and overall relationshiprelationship quality.

They highlight particularly the concern that if those awarding government contracts focus on cost rather than effectiveness then smaller providers (who may lack economies of scale but might offer advantages such as innovation or better quality relationships with service users) will lose out.

The results show that eHarmony couples scored significantly higher in regard to all four components of relationship quality measured by the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS): consensus, satisfaction, affectional expression and cohesion.

The goal in setting up the Quality of Life Scale is to provide a guideline so that pet owners can maintain a rewarding relationship that nurtures the human - animal bond.

This group of intergenerational artists closely considers the process of art - making in their work by playing with scale, the ephemeral quality of their materials, the nature of time and language, and the relationships between the objects that they create.

The Art Show 2018 offered intimately scaled and thoughtfully curated presentations of the highest quality — fostering active conversations with gallerists, new relationships, and close looking at works by artists from a variety of genres, practices, and national and international origins.

Each group claims certain benefits to its small scale: sustainability not at the expense of quality; long - term relationships with artists and publics; less compromised access to artwork; and horizontal networks and collaboration.

Quality, taste, and relationships drive farm - to - table trends, and have become an example of how food culture is a successful model for climate change solutions on a city - wide scale.

Featuring a major new sound and video installation and a large - scale drawing project by Anri Sala, the exhibition Take Over addresses central themes in Anri Sala's oeuvre, exploring the relationships between music and narrative, architecture and film and interleaving qualities of different media in both complex and intuitive ways to produce works in which one medium takes on the qualities of another.

Featuring a major new sound and video installation and a large - scale drawing project, the exhibition addresses central themes in Anri Sala's oeuvre, exploring the relationships between music and narrative, architecture and film and interleaving qualities of different media in both complex and intuitive ways to produce works in which one medium takes on the qualities of another.

The second part of the survey was a scale asking participants to rate their attitudes toward physical affection and how it can influence the quality of the relationship (e.g., «There is less conflict in romantic relationships when partners give each other physical affection.»)

Foggy faithfulness: Relationship quality, religiosity, and the Perceptions of Dating Infidelity Scale in an adult sample.

Relationship quality was indexed as both general perceptions of social support (e.g., the extent to which participants felt they had someone who is «around when I am in need» or «who cares about my feelings»), and the degree of closeness individuals felt with their romantic partner (i.e., the Inclusion - of - Other - in - the - Self (IOS) scale).

Participants also filled out the Relationship Assessment Scale, which asks participants to respond to statements regarding the quality of the relationship, such as, «My partner meets my nRelationship Assessment Scale, which asks participants to respond to statements regarding the quality of the relationship, such as, «My partner meets my nrelationship, such as, «My partner meets my needs.»

The Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS)[12] is a widely used 32 - item measure of relationship quality based on Likert - type ratings of criteria such as agreement on activities and issues such as sex relations, philosophy of life, and religious matters.

Few studies have specifically addressed this issue.14, 15 A large scale randomized control trial (RCT) comparing CBT, counselling and psychoanalytic therapy with routine care found that, while all active treatments were moderately effective in treating depression and brought about short term benefits in the quality of the mother - infant relationship, there was limited evidence of benefit to infant outcome; and effects (including those on maternal mood) were not apparent at follow - up.16, 17 Similarly, a recent RCT found that, although interpersonal psychotherapy was effective in treating maternal depression, there was no benefit in terms of observed mother - infant interactions, infant negative emotionality, and infant attachment security.18

Women carrying one or two A-alleles score lower on the partner bonding scale and the relationship quality survey as well as are more likely to report martial problems than woman carrying two G alleles (Walum et al., 2012).

Marital quality was measured by the four - item version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, a scale that includes items about marital happiness, confiding in one another, believing things are going well in the relationship, and thoughts of divorce (Sabourin, Valois, & Lussier, 2005; Spanier, 1Scale, a scale that includes items about marital happiness, confiding in one another, believing things are going well in the relationship, and thoughts of divorce (Sabourin, Valois, & Lussier, 2005; Spanier, 1scale that includes items about marital happiness, confiding in one another, believing things are going well in the relationship, and thoughts of divorce (Sabourin, Valois, & Lussier, 2005; Spanier, 1976).

Relationship quality can be measured with the Dyadic Relationship Scale.

Relationship Satisfaction — Relationship satisfaction was assessed using two separate measures: the Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS; Hendrick, Dicke, & Hendrick, 1998), and the Quality of Marriage Index (QMI; Norton, 1983).

By establishing and managing robust C - Level relationships, Mr. Peterson has orchestrated large scale negotiations and presentations to both multi-billion-dollar companies as well as volunteer service projects, building lasting relationships with clients utilizing his developed servant leadership qualities, an ingrained sense of humor, and his impeccable moral and integrity standards.

Therefore, within this research tradition, teacher reports of relationship quality, mostly assessed using the Student — Teacher Relationship Scale, typically measure teachers» perceptions of the interpersonal relationship with a specific student, of the behaviors of that student towards the teacher, and their views about the student's feelings about the teacher (Prelationship quality, mostly assessed using the Student — Teacher Relationship Scale, typically measure teachers» perceptions of the interpersonal relationship with a specific student, of the behaviors of that student towards the teacher, and their views about the student's feelings about the teacher (PRelationship Scale, typically measure teachers» perceptions of the interpersonal relationship with a specific student, of the behaviors of that student towards the teacher, and their views about the student's feelings about the teacher (Prelationship with a specific student, of the behaviors of that student towards the teacher, and their views about the student's feelings about the teacher (Pianta 2001).

The PIR - GAS allows for a global rating of the quality of a parent - infant (or parent — child) relationship on a numerical scale, with higher scores indicating higher relationship quality.

Finally, participants rated the quality of relationships with their children on a scale from 0 (worst relationship) to 10 (best relationship) in response to the question, «How would you rate your relationship with your children?»

The results showed a valid and reliable scale with robust reliability coefficients that will use it to measure perceptions of quality in the relationship, and so contribute to research in psychology to reach an understanding of the nature of the duration, maintenance, repair, or even breaking them.

4) Quality of life defined as subjective evaluations of both positive and negative aspects of life covered physical functioning, occupational role, interpersonal relationships and psychological functioning, measured by validated standardized including General Quality of Life Inventory -74 - GQOLI - 74 which measured physical functioning, psychological functioning, social functioning, and standard of living; Well - Being scale - WBS, measure positive aspects of psychological functioning.

The quality of the mother - child relationship in high risk dyads: Application of the emotional availability scales in an intergenerational, longitudinal study

Figure 1 showed the average relationships quality and shared activity scales of all partnered men and women by age groups from Table 2.

This paper introduces scales on shared activity and relationship quality for married and partnered older adults using multiple indicators from the second wave of National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project.

The supportive quality of the mother - grandmother relationship was measured by both observational and self - report scales.

Add Health includes an 11 - item parent connectedness scale (Sieving et al., 2001) for which adolescents reported on the quality of their relationships with their parents and the extent to which their parents care about and support them.

Methods: Four hundred seventy adults in Chieti, Italy, completed an anonymous and confidential survey regarding their childhood exposure to parental alienating behaviors (using the Baker Strategy Questionnaire), quality of the parent — child relationship (using Parental Bonding Instruments), self - esteem (using Rosenberg Self - Esteem Scale), and global psychological distress (using Global Severity Index of Symptom Checklist -90-Revised).

To construct a scale of relationship quality, we considered eight indicators of this.

The Scale of Inter-generational Relationship Quality (SIRQ) is a global observational coding system developed to assess the quality of the mother - grandmother relationship based on the videotaped interaction of the two (for details, see Wakschlag, Chase - Lansdale, & Brooks - Gunn, Relationship Quality (SIRQ) is a global observational coding system developed to assess the quality of the mother - grandmother relationship based on the videotaped interaction of the two (for details, see Wakschlag, Chase - Lansdale, & Brooks - Gunn, 1991,Quality (SIRQ) is a global observational coding system developed to assess the quality of the mother - grandmother relationship based on the videotaped interaction of the two (for details, see Wakschlag, Chase - Lansdale, & Brooks - Gunn, 1991,quality of the mother - grandmother relationship based on the videotaped interaction of the two (for details, see Wakschlag, Chase - Lansdale, & Brooks - Gunn, relationship based on the videotaped interaction of the two (for details, see Wakschlag, Chase - Lansdale, & Brooks - Gunn, 1991, 1996).

This paper introduces scales on shared activity and relationship quality for married and partnered older adults.

Relationship satisfaction was evaluated at both data collection points using a slightly modified version of the Norton (1983) Quality of Marriage Index (QMI), which is a self - reporting scale composed of 6 - items (Nazarinia & White, 2010).

To construct scales of relationship quality and shared activity, we began by selecting indicators for each scale based on previous research on positive and negative marital quality and the shared activity of social relationships.

However, this item had a low item - rest correlation with other three items for negative dimensions of relationships -LRB-.27) and its removal increased the scale's overall internal consistency (negative relationships quality [NRQ] from.63 to.66).

Although Hispanic Americans are one of the fastest growing ethnic populations in the United States, use and psychometric testing of Spanish versions of two instruments commonly used to measure quality of the couple's relationship and family functioning, the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) and the FACES II, have not been reported.

The scale was developed for the MoBa and is based on core items used in previously developed measures of marital satisfaction and relationship quality [33 — 35].

Participants were able to opt out of the scale regarding either parent if the scale was not applicable; 3044 (81 %) females and 1996 (76 %) males, provided information on both mother and father - adolescent relationship quality.

Items were rated on a 5 - point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree) and we divided the sum by 9 to give a mean score ranging from 1.0 to 5.0 with a higher score representing higher quality of the parent - adolescent relationship.