Which isn't to say the film lacks for ambition, because the story's view of Laura's
relationship to men does indeed ferociously and unusually articulate Margaret Atwood's idea that «those who say they want nothing want everything.»
Not exact matches
I've passed on opportunities
to invest in ventures where I didn't trust the CEO or felt the
relationship lacked alignment or the problem or solution presented wasn't compelling - these were led by women and
men.
And all this avalanche was caused by a not very successful attempt by a porn actress Stormy Daniel
to make a photo robot of a
man who allegedly threatened her and her daughter if she
did not give up attempts
to cancel the agreement between her and Donald Trump, forbidding her
to publish memories of their not quite platonic
relationships, at the time in his life, when he could not imagine himself as President of the United States even in his worst nightmare.
While Canadian women are just as likely as
men to use the services of an advisor, and with relatively similar results in satisfaction with them, they tend
to value the «soft» elements of the client - advisor
relationship more than
men do.
And isn't the
relationship with God, and each spiritual journey going
to lead us in different directions — why
do we need
to judge others who profess Love of God, who profess love of their fellow
man, yet seem
to us
to act unkindly
to others, how can we judge them unless we talk
to them and understand them as well as God
does.
If
man is not made more in the image of God than woman is, then how
does man leading church better represent the
relationship of God
to man than a woman leading church would?
EvolvedDNA «why is it rude
to call you on your myths» = > we can talk about gods of past that were
man made but our God is a living God and some of us have a personal
relationship with God because of what God has actually
done in our lives.
This game of seduction may or may not result in a longterm
relationship, but if it
does, I would be willing
to bet that even ten years down the road there are still things that this
man and woman are learning about one another that they didn't know previously.
You cant debate God... you cant use logic
to explain God... You cant use your small finite mind
to try and explain away an infinite God...
Man is flesh and blood but man has a spirit and some things can only be received and revealed thru spirit... And what you do nt see is actually more real than what you can observe with your five senses... And BTW I did nt say religion i said God... Religion is man made tradition... God is real... develop a personal relationship with the one who created you and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life
Man is flesh and blood but
man has a spirit and some things can only be received and revealed thru spirit... And what you do nt see is actually more real than what you can observe with your five senses... And BTW I did nt say religion i said God... Religion is man made tradition... God is real... develop a personal relationship with the one who created you and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life
man has a spirit and some things can only be received and revealed thru spirit... And what you
do nt see is actually more real than what you can observe with your five senses... And BTW I
did nt say religion i said God... Religion is
man made tradition... God is real... develop a personal relationship with the one who created you and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life
man made tradition... God is real... develop a personal
relationship with the one who created you and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life...
Duet 11; 26 God gives
man a choice
to be blessed or cursed same as Adam there are consequences when we chose not
to heed Gods word.
Did God curse Adam yes he
did both he and eve died spiritually they lost that constant fellowship with God that
relationship was broken.So he was cast out from the garden from under Gods protection.Adams love for Eve was his downfall he chose her love over Gods love and When we chose anything else other than him for our security we fall into the same trap as Adam.and we also must deal with the consequences.He most definitely is a jealous God.brentnz
Its sad that religion is the gospel of many churchs today rather than a real
relationship with Christ based on his grace rather than works.Just as cains offering wasnt acceptable
to the Lord its the same for churchs today the Lord is not pleased by our efforts he
does nt need our efforts they
do not build Gods kingdom nor
do mans programmes..
Rather, she explores the complex of emotions that beset a woman seeking
to navigate the unpredictable waters of contemporary
relationships — sleeping with a married
man who in turn has an unfaithful wife («Don't think of me»); longing for a lover who slipped away without saying good bye («My lover's gone»), vaunting one's independence whilst yearning for some permanent connection («My life»), feeling deeply uncomfortable with oneself: «I just want
to feel safe in my own skin.»
To my surprise, the preceding paragraph had nothing to do with the relationship between men and women, but was instead about the relationship between masters and slave
To my surprise, the preceding paragraph had nothing
to do with the relationship between men and women, but was instead about the relationship between masters and slave
to do with the
relationship between
men and women, but was instead about the
relationship between masters and slaves!
A Question Of Human Dignity I applaud James Legge for directing attention towards questions
to do with the
relationship between animals and
man (Faith, January / February 2004).
If you think these
men a sheltered life and don't understand human
relationships and fatherhood it is because you haven't bothered
to understand their mission within the church.
As for me being attracted
to other
men... well I think we went over that I'm not gay, but if you want
to go
to the whole «It's not natural thing» well considering that there has been ho.mose.xuality in other species, it actually
does occur in nature, what doesn't however is monogamous
relationships.
Nothing
to do with two
men in a committed, loving
relationship.
In each case faith involves a
relationship of trust which prompts the
man to do certain things as a result.
The very word — having
to do with a «city» and hence indicative of social
relationships of a high order of intensity — shows that we have here a reflection of
man's integral belonging - with - others.
Again, it has nothing
to do with two
men (or two women) in a committed, loving
relationship; it has
to do with one being used for sex — something I think all of us would agree is WRONG.
Psalm 10: 3 - 4 — This talks about the wicked
men, how they
do nt have God in their hearts or in their minds, which is a fine piece of scripture but it can hardly be used for either myself or the maker of the video since we both seem
to advocate a deep and personal
relationship with the Lord rather than letting a group of «religious» people ruin it for you.
Yo moron they use that same tactic today straight
men rape other
men to show their dominance it has nothing
to do with the loving respectful long term
relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.
To Amy - don't let a
man, a pastor or a king tell you that God doesn't want a
relationship with you because that's a lie.
«For these
men the term «monogamy» simply doesn't necessarily mean sexual exclusivity... The term «open
relationship» has for a great many gay
men come
to have one specific definition: A
relationship in which the partners have sex on the outside often, put away their resentment and jealousy, and discuss their outside sex with each other, or share sex partners.
We don't hear about dinasaurs or prehistoric
man because we don't need it
to increase our faith and
relationship with God.
I don't understand why gay
men and women would even want
to be part of an organization that clearly doesn't accept them as they are... they must forgo intimate
relationships to be members of this church?
The bible Belt is also the lynching belt, the segregation belt, the military belt, the illiteracy belt - When I read the Gospels I read Jesus telling me about the kind of
relationship i should have with God and my fellows - how I should live how I should behave - we are supposed
to care for the poor not lower taxes for the rich and tell poor kids with no health insurance
to suck it up - starting a war is not Christian regardless of the provocation Why
do you need the 10 commandments on the wall in the courthouse when every town has multiple churches let the churches put up signs with the commandments -
do you know what Moses
did when he came down the mountain - he lead his most trusted
men is a slaughter of 3000 Jews, read it
My personal
relationship with Jesus Christ has nothing
to do with my disgust for
men of the Church who have been exposed and are being hid or transferred when the church is aware they are preying on children.
Man's wholeness
does not exist apart from real
relationship to other beings.
But real justice
does not exist until
men actually make use of the foundation and material provided by this impersonal political order
to build just
relationships in concrete situations.
What we should have
done is
to see that in the «Galilean vision», as Whitehead called it, we have the clue
to the proper category for use in the God -
man relationship; the category is «love in action», the divine Lover acting and the human intentional lover acting too.
In a study of his earlier pictures, Kolker notes that «Scorsese is interested in the psychological manifestations of individuals who are representative either of a class or of a certain ideological grouping; he is concerned with their
relationship to each other or
to an antagonistic environment... [and finally] there is no triumph for his characters» (A Cinema of Loneliness [Oxford University Press, 19881, p. 162) The Jesus of the Last Temptation fits this pattern (as
do Travis Bickel in Taxi Driver, Jake LaMotta in Raging Bull and Paul Hackett in After Hours) By eschewing any reference
to a resurrection — and, in an interesting theological note, allowing Paul
to suggest that his preaching of the risen Christ is more important than the Jesus of history — Scorsese presents the crucifixion as the final willful act of a
man driven by a God who makes strange demands on his followers.
Precisely that kind of
man, «transported by his passion» — in this case his being caught up into a
relationship with God in Christ, although it may very well be true in other ways as well, since
to be «transported» by passion is
to enter upon the most profound experience possible
to human beings — precisely such a
man does feel and know what is nothing other than «the secret of the universe».
The thrust of it is
to build
relationships with
men and women in prison, so that when they get out, they don't commit the crime again.
i can feel love for him throughout my heart and soul... i want
to grow old with this
man... i am 47 and he is 45... he has never been married... he said there is not a chance of getting back together again regardless of how we feel towards each other because we committed adultery and God will never forgive us and it will be wrong
to do so... so am i supposed
to go on living my life being so deeply in love with this
man i can never have... why would God put him in my life
to make me feel so spiritually happy, so wonderful, so at peace with myself and someone I can finally worship Him with just
to take him away from me... I've never been with someone who was so religious and i thought this was it... i finally have someone
to read the bible with and go
to church with and put God first and share things with my self and my daughter as a loving
relationship would be....
We have become way too much eyeball people as Christians assume that those who don't live according
to the way they
do they are unsaved, we have created this judgemental
relationship which hurts peoples fellowship with God, there are no litmus tests for people that believe in Jesus, which is why we are called
to not judge others, and people use James 2:14, and 1 John's verse of those who practices righteousness are righteous even though I think it's talking about earthly righteousness toward people that we as Christians should show because there is a lost world out there that needs are help and these doctrines of guilt, condemnation, anger, and judgement aren't helping in fact they are
doing the opposite, just like how in James it's justification towards
man.
How about married gay
men (I know it's a foreign concept
to you, but here in Canada there are plenty) who don't use condoms since they're in a monogamous
relationship?
In our formulation of the Christian life we have
to do justice both
to the grace and
to the growth, for whatever progress in the life of love is possible, it is always progress within the structure of
man's
relationship to the creative and redemptive working of God.
Would you say that there's a cause and effect there,
do you think that thinking in a more
man - centred way has led
to us praying in a more
man - centred way, or
do you think it's the other way round, or is it a more subtle
relationship between liturgy and theology in the Church?
We are radicals for capitalism; we are fighting for that philosophical base which capitalism
did not have and without which it was doomed
to perish... Politics is based on three other philosophical disciplines: metaphysics, epistemology and ethics — on a theory of
man's nature and of
man's
relationship to existence.
He fails
to achieve the first goal because he makes of God an exception which
does not permit the
relationship between God and
man to be analogous
to the
relationship between two contiguous actual occasions and because his overwhelming commitment
to what he regards as exceptional in God severely restricts
man's independence from God as a subject free for his own self - determination.
go read a dictionary... better yet Ill give you a link... from what I gain from your post... it seems you don't give a darn of your
relationship with your wife... if she wants
to run off with another
man... are you gonna freely let her go..
The
man who seeks
to bring himself into
relationship with God and seeks it with as much earnest zeal as others seek the goods which they may obtain in their several businesses and professions in the ways of the world
does not come away empty.
The closeness of the
relationship between the two
men is difficult
to establish from the works of either, but the friendship they apparently share
does not seem improbable.
Paul Tillich, who has
done so much
to clarify the
relationship between theology and psychiatry, rightly insists that the religious dimension of healing is related
to, but goes beyond, the cure of particular neuroses.3 What Tillich calls «ontological anxiety» and «personal guilt» arise within
man's «ultimate concern.»
First, we may not be cub - eating lions, but we
do have cougars [a term which, for the benefit of readers not familiar with North American slang, refers
to an older woman seeking a sexual
relationship with a younger
man].
Many
men grow up so scared of women they never develop healthy
relationships with any of them; they don't actually get
to know a girl as a co-equal member of the human race.
It is easy
to see that this sort of self - denial
does not lay hold of God or the God -
relationship, but remains on the worldly plane of a
relationship between
men.
As the counselor is able
to stay on the alcoholic's emotional wavelength, the
relationship is strengthened by the alcoholic's awareness — «This
man really
does understand and care!»
This brief review of what must be
done to establish right
relationships between
man and nature suggests something of the educational task.