It would clearly be inappropriate to regress surface temperature changes on forcing changes for the reasons you give, since
relative uncertainty in forcing changes is much larger than that in temperature changes.
Not exact matches
Indeed, the main quandary faced by climate scientists is how to estimate climate sensitivity from the Little Ice Age or Medieval Warm Period, at all, given the
relative small
forcings over the past 1000 years, and the substantial
uncertainties in both the
forcings and the temperature changes.
This figure gives a sense of the wide
uncertainty distribution
in the total anthropogenic
forcing relative to just the GHG
forcing (which also includes methane, N2O, etc) which is a prime reason the instrumental record doesn't inherently give good constraints on sensitivity.
Indeed, the main quandary faced by climate scientists is how to estimate climate sensitivity from the Little Ice Age or Medieval Warm Period, at all, given the
relative small
forcings over the past 1000 years, and the substantial
uncertainties in both the
forcings and the temperature changes.
There is the possibility that the
relative importance of CO2 as a climate forcer increases as it transcends the other controllers of Earth's energy balance (some of which may be masked more
in ice age studies — like
uncertainties around the amount of ice age aerosol climate
forcing, ice age thermohaline stability and as always insolation differences throughout the Pleistocene).
The first step
in being truly objective is to openly acknowledge the large degree of
uncertainty which exists today on the
relative importance of natural and anthropogenic climate
forcing components and, hence, on the validity of any long - term projections of future impact of anthropogenic factors.
Based on an extensive literature review, we suggest that (1) climate warming occurs with great
uncertainty in the magnitude of the temperature increase; (2) both human activities and natural
forces contribute to climate change, but their
relative contributions are difficult to quantify; and (3) the dominant role of the increase
in the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases (including CO2)
in the global warming claimed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is questioned by the scientific communities because of large
uncertainties in the mechanisms of natural factors and anthropogenic activities and
in the sources of the increased atmospheric CO2 concentration.
Pleistocene climate oscillations yield a fast - feedback climate sensitivity of 3 ± 1 °C for a 4 W m − 2 CO2
forcing if Holocene warming
relative to the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) is used as calibration, but the error (
uncertainty) is substantial and partly subjective because of poorly defined LGM global temperature and possible human influences
in the Holocene.