So if you are a privileged
relatively affluent person who does not like taxes (dreams of bureaucrats) and on the other hand loves «freedom» reigning in society as well as in nature, the worst thing now would be a surge of justified guilt feelings and then solidarity resulting from recognition of AGW.
Not exact matches
Often it is
people who live in middle - class or
affluent neighborhoods that are
relatively free of violent crime who insist on holding a «root - cause» seminar while
people are dying in the streets.
Most
people who live
relatively affluent lives remain politically on the sidelines while trusting in the essential viability and goodness of the U.S. democratic system.
People using the internet for research are likely to be
relatively affluent and
relatively well educated.
As noted then, it was based on a C.D. Howe Institute report that suggested one possible solution to the alleged retirement crisis was simply to go back to the half - century - plus RRSP and raise contribution limits for the (
relatively) few
affluent people who are forced to save in taxable accounts because they've maxed out on RRSP room.
The
person that made them, he decided, was an African - American woman who was born in Conyers, Ga., the second of three children in a
relatively affluent family.
Against nostalgic accounts like Howard Zinn's A
People's History of the United States, most social - change movements are started and directed by the
relatively affluent and well - educated, from the preacher - led civil rights movement to modern feminism to gay rights.
Do we mean it for
people other than the
relatively affluent few?