However, while New York may consume
relatively less fossil fuels than other American cities and may do a good job in providing clean water, it does a poor job of reducing, recycling and disposing of its waste.
Not exact matches
According to the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers, wind power has «
relatively little economic value» and because of its intermittent nature it needs back - up from natural gas, which means more
fossil fuel use for power, not
less.
It should be noted though that eliminating the indirect
fossil fuel subsidy could actually make wind & solar
less competitive because they are dependent on flexible dispatchable plants with
relatively low CAPEX.
But
less in the spotlight is its widely claimed role as a
relatively clean
fossil fuel - one that can ease the path from the old - energy to the clean - energy economy.
If the Earth's climate is
relatively insensitive to rising carbon levels, then it's somewhat
less urgent that we stop burning massive quantities of
fossil fuels.
When the carbon comes back up, the ratios of 12C to 13C are preserved: emissions from the burning of
fossil fuels, for example, are
relatively «light» because they originated from the tissues of living organisms; emissions from volcanoes are more or
less «normal» because they came from molten crust that was once the ocean floor.
Observational evidence suggests that some organic aerosol compounds from
fossil fuels are
relatively weakly absorbing but do absorb solar radiation at some ultraviolet and visible wavelengths (e.g., Bond et al., 1999; Jacobson, 1999; Bond, 2001) although organic aerosol from high - temperature combustion such as
fossil fuel burning (Dubovik et al., 1998; Kirchstetter et al., 2004) appears
less absorbing than from low - temperature combustion such as open biomass burning.