The answer relies on
the relatively simple math of figuring out how much income will be generated by each investor's nest egg.
Not exact matches
Some of the reason is
simple math: R - rated movies just don't make as much money as PG - 13 movies do, so studios are eager to chop their films into
relatively tame affairs.
Hands - on activities have been shown to promote science learning at all levels (Bredderman, 1983), and possibly
math learning in kindergarten and first grade, when
relatively simple objects are used to focus students» attention on
math concepts (McNeil and Jarvin, 2009).
And another cool trick is that because the tablet knows how far those three lenses are from each other it can do some (
relatively)
simple math and actually measure distance within picture you've taken.
Like so many investing issues, the benefits of reinvesting are propelled by
math that seems
relatively simple, at least on the surface.
If the skeptics were real skeptics and not the fake «skeptics» that seem to permeate this commenting area, then they would actually try to deconstruct the
math of this
relatively simple formulation.
The
math is
relatively simple... if you need 65 % of your income to maintain your lifestyle in a disability situation, then paying tax on that 65 % drastically decreases your spending power.