So, Agri stocks offer
relatively uncorrelated exposure (on an underlying basis) to pretty favourable secular growth (and emerging / frontier market) trends.
Holding uncorrelated assets, such as stocks and bonds, are one of the most popular methods for reducing portfolio risk since historically stocks and bonds are
relatively uncorrelated.
Anyway, much of my event - driven exposure was ultimately re-invested in Alternative Asset Opportunities (TLI: LN)-- so I simply exchanged a low return /
relatively uncorrelated risk for a cheap / high return / totally uncorrelated risk!
Bernstein found that rebalancing works best for more volatile stock - only portfolios, especially where the various stock holdings turn out to be
relatively uncorrelated.
We know the real value of cash will erode overtime (usually slowly) due to inflation, but cash has the advantage of being
relatively uncorrelated with stock market movements.
I've heard it argued that equities and bonds are
relatively uncorrelated — bonds can do well when the stock market is doing badly — and that's part of the rationale for some mix.
I've heard it argued that equities and bonds are
relatively uncorrelated — bonds can do well when the stock market is doing badly — and that's part of the rationale for some mix.
Not exact matches
Even a
relatively small exposure to the
uncorrelated returns can dramatically impact a portfolio.
Stocks which offer (
relatively)
uncorrelated returns vs. the market are even more attractive, but that much rarer.
In the
relatively unlikely event that a proxy indicator represents a truly local climate phenomenon which is
uncorrelated with larger scale climate variations, or represents a highly nonlinear response to climate variations...