It is not possible for the sensible energy
released by condensation to cause enough heating to prevent the air from contracting cooling and descending so the net result must be an increase not a decrease in surface pressure.
Remove the water vapour and the air which lacks it must descend.The heat
released by condensation can never heat it enough to make it lighter than air containing water vapour.
I was unhappy with my comment and so have been looking it up and have confirmed that the energy
released by condensation warms the air.
Our estimates suggest that the global mean power at which this potential energy is
released by condensation is around one per cent of the global solar power — this is similar to the known stationary dissipative power of general atmospheric circulation.
This paper actually proposes that the sensible heat
released by condensation warms the dryer air to a point where it becomes even lighter than air containing water in vapour form.
Is it the heat
released by condensation of the water vapor?
Yes, heat
released by condensation of water vapor weakens ice.
In the atmosphere there is fundamentally only one dominant driving mechanism — temperature (although modulated by water vapor and the latent heat
released by condensation into clouds).
Not exact matches
First, it's a cycle, so all that speeding it up does is to raise the gross amount of heat absorbed to cause evaporation, which is exactly balanced
by the gross heat
released during
condensation.
And the process of
condensation where moist air forms clouds is the process
by which the latent heat is
released — warming the lower troposphere while cooling the surface.
Heat (not latent heat) is removed prior to
condensation by conversion of kinetic energy to potential energy which then provokes
condensation and when the phase change occurs the
release of latent heat causes the air parcel to rise a little further with additional conversion of KE to PE until it reaches the correct lapse rate temperature for its height and then it stops rising and begins to descend.
The open cycle consists of the following steps: (i) flash evaporation of a fraction of the warm seawater
by reduction of pressure below the saturation value corresponding to its temperature (ii) expansion of the vapor through a turbine to generate power; (iii) heat transfer to the cold seawater thermal sink resulting in
condensation of the working fluid; and (iv) compression of the non-condensable gases (air
released from the seawater streams at the low operating pressure) to pressures required to discharge them from the system.
I am thinking the solar energy invested in evaporation (in this case, of irrigation water) is matched
by the energy
released during
condensation; energy
released to the atmosphere, raising the temperature of the air.
Condensation is certainly there and it's important because of the
release of latent heat, but the loss of gas molecules is compensated automatically
by rather small vertical adjustments in the atmosphere and does not drive anything of the kind the paper proposes.
The local pressure reduction pointed to when
condensation reduces volume is instantly offset
by mass flowing into the original volume from the surroundings and the energy
released is not enough to make the air parcel and the liquid contents lighter than air containing water vapour.
1g / kg of
condensation releases enough latent heat to warm the air
by 2.5 C. 2.
I just tried jotting down, step
by step, a sequence of events beginning with evaporation from the sea surface, absorption of latent heat, subsequent
condensation at altitude into opaque liquid droplets and the
release of selfsame latent heat.