How has it been performing versus
the relevant benchmark index?
Then compare that performance to
the relevant benchmark index shown on each graph.
discussed how the average individual investor actually performs substantially worse than
relevant benchmark indices.
Article 4.1 discussed how the average individual investor actually performs substantially worse than
relevant benchmark indices.
Not exact matches
They then compared the weightings versus the
relevant equity
index benchmark to calculate its «crowded» stock analysis.
Keep an eye on performance, especially comparing how your funds are doing in relation to
relevant benchmarks These include market and mutual fund specific
indexes, as well as other factors that may affect performance in the future.
In describing their historical performance, private investment counsel firms will usually show composite returns earned by their clients in an investment category like Canadian equity compared to a
relevant benchmark (in this case, the S&P / TSX Composite
Index).
Effective July 29, 2013, the Value Fund removed the 50 % requirement, and continues to use the MSCI World
Index (Hedged to US$) as the most
relevant benchmark.
* Note — In this fact sheet we provide 2
relevant benchmarks for the Swan Defined Risk Strategy: the S&P 500
Index and a 60/40 portfolio, comprised of 60 % S&P 500
Index and 40 % Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond
Index.
For the period from the Fund's inception through 2006, the Investment Adviser chose the S&P 500
Index as the
relevant market
benchmark.
Starting in mid-December 2006, the Fund's investment mandate changed from investing at least 80 % of its assets in U.S. securities to investing no less than approximately 50 % in U.S. securities, and the Investment Adviser chose the MSCI World
Index (Hedged to US$) as the most
relevant benchmark for the Fund starting January 1, 2007.
This happens to be the goal of many hedge funds and for that reason a
relevant benchmark for me is the Hennessee Hedge Fund
Index (http://www.hennesseegroup.com/indices/returns/year/2010.html).
The ETF's I use cover a variety of equity markets, currencies, precious metals, commodities, real estate, US bonds, emerging market bonds, etc so there is no
relevant index that serves as a
benchmark.
The information is intended to show the effects on risk and returns of different asset allocations over time based on hypothetical combinations of the
benchmark indexes that correspond to the
relevant asset class.
Our corporate objective is to deliver long - term capital growth, while preserving shareholders» capital; to invest without the constraints of a formal
benchmark, but to deliver for shareholders increases in capital value in excess of the
relevant indices over time.
For performance
benchmarks the net total return (NR)
indices are usually the most
relevant.
Again, as with my last post, it's been a game of two halves — but looking v different here... In H1 - 2013, my Beta portfolios trailed the
benchmark — but since the
index scored a single - digit return & we're talking about an average 4 mth comparison period, that was never v
relevant.
As a
benchmark, the MIP used the Barclay's Government / Credit 1 - 5 A - or better
index throughout the
relevant time period.
Index - Related Risks In order to meet its investment objective, each iShares ® fund will seek to achieve a return which reflects the return of its benchmark index as published by the relevant index prov
Index - Related Risks In order to meet its investment objective, each iShares ® fund will seek to achieve a return which reflects the return of its
benchmark index as published by the relevant index prov
index as published by the
relevant index prov
index provider.