Not exact matches
They simply ended it by saying (
in paraphrase) «the usa and japan are at extreme opposites
in terms of laws, and can we learn anything from them while retaining our american
way and is culture more the reason for these
differences in laws imposed or not imposed on people while questioning if it really is for the better or not» He doesn't come to any conclusion but simply just wrote an interesting and
relevant article opening up some insight into how different things are depeneding where you are from.
The
difference lies
in the
way the current hardware will remain
relevant in tandem with a more powerful successor.
As I see it, the chief
difference between my work and theirs is the content; while Warhol and Rauschenberg largely re-contextualized appropriated photographic imagery, I choose to utilize only original photographs which are
relevant to my personal life experiences
in some
way.
It addressed, through presentations, subsequent question and answer sessions and a general discussion, the following issues: clarification of the nature and level of the targets communicated by developed country Parties; assumptions and conditions associated with the targets; commonalities and
differences of approach
in measuring the progress towards the targets; comparability of emission reduction efforts by developed country Parties, and options and
ways to increase the level of ambition of the pledges;
relevant policies and measures to support the targets, and experience with low - emission development strategies; and possible
ways forward.
But McQuack's comments are
relevant,
in a weird
way: Cigarette smoke is so complicated, and human biological
differences strong enough, that we really don't understand the exact mechanisms... despite the overpowering statistics.
Customize each letter to make yourself as appealing as possible
in ways that are
relevant to those
differences.