Sentences with phrase «relevant documents in the possession»

Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley and top Democrat Dianne Feinstein warned in letters to those testifying next week that they need to «preserve all relevant documents in your possession... related to Russian interference in the 2016 election, including documents related to your or the Trump campaign's contacts with Russian government officials, associates or representatives.»
That distinction is recognized in Ontario in Rule 30.02 (4): (4) The court may order a party to disclose all relevant documents in the possession, control or power of the party's subsidiary or affiliated corporation or of a corporation controlled directly or indirectly by the party and to produce for inspection all such documents that are not privileged.
9 Order to go that the defendant disclose all relevant documents in the possession, control or power of its affiliated corporation, General Motors Corporation, and produce for inspection all such documents that are not privileged.

Not exact matches

Litigants in Ontario are required to disclose every document in their power, control or possession that is relevant to the lawsuit at hand.
In Ontario, parties are required to disclose to the opposing side every document in their power, possession or control that is relevant to the lawsuiIn Ontario, parties are required to disclose to the opposing side every document in their power, possession or control that is relevant to the lawsuiin their power, possession or control that is relevant to the lawsuit.
Traditionally, parties in litigation may discover all relevant documents in the «possession, custody or control» of another party to the suit.
In dealing with the claimant's further request for an order that anyone who had read the privileged documents or was aware of their content should be removed from further involvement in the relevant FSA investigation, the judge held that, while the approach identified in the private law context to the question whether a lawyer in possession of privileged material should be restrained from acting is a useful guide, when the question arises in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disputIn dealing with the claimant's further request for an order that anyone who had read the privileged documents or was aware of their content should be removed from further involvement in the relevant FSA investigation, the judge held that, while the approach identified in the private law context to the question whether a lawyer in possession of privileged material should be restrained from acting is a useful guide, when the question arises in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disputin the relevant FSA investigation, the judge held that, while the approach identified in the private law context to the question whether a lawyer in possession of privileged material should be restrained from acting is a useful guide, when the question arises in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disputin the private law context to the question whether a lawyer in possession of privileged material should be restrained from acting is a useful guide, when the question arises in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disputin possession of privileged material should be restrained from acting is a useful guide, when the question arises in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disputin judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disputin the underlying dispute.
The List of Documents is a form that tells the other party which relevant documents are in the possession and control of the listiDocuments is a form that tells the other party which relevant documents are in the possession and control of the listidocuments are in the possession and control of the listing party.
30.02 (1) Every document relevant to any matter in issue in an action that is or has been in the possession, control or power of a party to the action shall be disclosed as provided in rules 30.03 to 30.10, whether or not privilege is claimed in respect of the document.
Indeed, as part of the civil pre-trial discovery process, an alleged offender will have to produce all relevant, non-privileged documents in his possession, power or control and to submit to an oral examination under oath.
(1) A party to an action shall serve on every other party an affidavit of documents (Form 30A or 30B) disclosing to the full extent of the party's knowledge, information and belief all documents relevant to any matter in issue in the action that are or have been in the party's possession, control or power.
(4) The arbitration tribunal may appoint one or more experts to report on specific issues and may direct a party to give an expert any relevant information or to provide access to any relevant documents, goods or property in its control or possession for inspection, subject to the following:
They have access to all the relevant documents and other evidence that was in the settling defendants» possession.
A party may also submit to the tribunal requests to the other party to produce documents («requests to produce»), containing: (i) a sufficiently detailed description of the requested document or category of documents; (ii) a statement of how the document (s) is / are relevant to the case and material to its outcome; and (iii) a statement that the documents requested are not in the possession of the requesting party, are in the possession of the other party and why disclosing them would not be an unnecessary burden for the other party (Art 3 (3)-RRB-.
Discovery — The procedures available to a party in a lawsuit to uncover relevant facts or information, which are known to other parties or witnesses or obtain documents in the possession and control of other parties or witnesses.
You must also included copies of all relevant real estate documents in your possession such as Listing Agreement, Purchase Agreement, Agency Disclosure (s), Seller's Property Disclosure, Addendums, or any other documents which support the charges mentioned in your complaint.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z