Sentences with phrase «relevant treaty»
The phrase "relevant treaty" means an important agreement or contract that is related to the current situation or topic being discussed. Full definition
It summarizes relevant treaties, cooperative development agreements, private — public partnerships and private sector initiatives and their relationship to climate objectives.
ipcc.ch
Britain can not extradite them, because of the gross imbalance of the relevant treaty.
There is no clear correlation between these jurisdictional clauses and provisions on applicable law in the relevant treaties.
However, this is not to say that if there is no relevant treaty applicable with the country to which your children have been taken that you can not take any action to recover your children.
There is no relevant treaty between China and the US, Now, apparently for the first time, a court in China has found reciprocity to exist in fact with the U.S., at least in a commercial matter in which there was a fixed money judgment.
Affected parties may be able to seek relief under applicable bilateral investment treaties with India depending on the residence of the affected parties and the language of the relevant treaties.
The questions that the WTO and the ICJ had to resolve were fundamentally legal ones concerning the interpretation of the relevant treaties.
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office had said: «All relevant treaty obligations insofaras they still subsisted became the responsibility of the Government of Canada with the attainment of independence, at the latest with the Statute of Westminster 1931.»
The reason for that is because this is done via diplomatic channels in the interest of preserving international comity (goodwill, friendly relations between countries) where a relevant treaty and process does not exist.
My guess, without reading the relevant treaties, is that consent to jurisdiction by the country under whose flag the ship operates subjects a ship to the treaty.
Unless all 27 other member states agreed to an extension, the court said, «Once a notice is given, it will inevitably result in the complete withdrawal of the UK from membership of the EU and from the relevant Treaties at the end of the two year period... The effect of the giving of notice under Art 50 on relevant rights is direct, even though the Art 50 process will take a while to be worked through» (at [11]-RRB-.
It therefore had no prerogative power to effect a withdrawal from the relevant Treaties by giving notice under Art 50 of the TEU.