Sentences with phrase «reliability coefficient»

In this study, the Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of this measure is 0.64 for mothers and 0.6 for fathers.

The alpha reliability coefficient of this scale with the current sample was 0.70.

The within - person omega reliability coefficient of this scale with the current sample was 0.88.

Furthermore, test - retest reliability was investigated with a reliability coefficient of 0.92 (Rasooli, 2001).

The WAI - S is a 12 - item, self - report questionnaire consisting of three subscales designed to assess three primary components of the working alliance: (1) how closely client and therapist agree on and are mutually engaged in the goals of treatment (goal subscale reliability coefficient in this study: α =.79), (2) how closely client and therapist agree on how to reach the treatment goals (task subscale reliability coefficient in this study: α =.70), and (3) the degree of mutual trust, acceptance, and confidence between client and therapist (bond subscale reliability coefficient in this study: α =.75).

The composite score (reliability coefficient in this study: =.83) is used as a global measurement of working alliance.

Overall, the reliability coefficient for the entire Social Inclusion Scale is 0.85.

Mean, Standard Deviation and Cronbach's Alpha Reliability Coefficient of the Urdu Passionate Love Scale (N = 300)

Results reported in Table 2 shows high level of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient on the scores of Urdu Passionate Love Scale (α =.90) which is quite good and high.

Internal consistency was included the cross language validation, Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and item total correlation respectively.

In phase II, internal consistency was computed through test - retest reliability / cross language validation, Cronbach's's alpha reliability coefficient and item total correlation.

Results indicated the good level of internal consistency in form of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient (α =.89).

Value of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient on scores of Urdu Passionate Love Scale was found quite high i.e. α =.90 which considered the best (Tezbasaran, 1997).

In phase II, internal consistency of the Urdu translated version of PLS was determined through test re-test reliability / cross language validation, Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and item total correlation.

Results showed high level of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient α = 0.90, test retest reliability ranged from r =.73 to r =.96 (ps <.01), item total correlation varying from r =.50 to r =.74 (ps <.01) and factor loading ranged from.39 to.73.

In a meta - analysis of the often - used measure, Credé and Phillips (2011) reported a mean reliability coefficient of 0.77 for the TA scale across previously reported research.

Based on the amount of reliability coefficient, Cronbach's Alfa of all factors is also with reliability 67.0 (Table 2).

As it has been Cronbach's Alfa reliability coefficient of factors are less but because total Alfa coefficient is high and has been approved, these factors are also approved.

A high internal consistency reliability coefficient of.92 was computed for the subject matter pretest.

The reliability coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) of the three family functioning FES subscale measures were slightly lower than reported by Moos (α =.62 for Family Cohesion, α =.59 for Family Expressiveness, and α =.63 for Family Conflict)(Saucier, Wilson, & Warka, 2007).

Reliability is typically captured using reliability coefficients as well as confidence intervals that help to situate and contextualize VAM estimates and their measurement errors.

The immediate need for high reliability coefficients has been the demise of performance assessments in Kentucky.

This is particularly pertinent when high - stakes decisions are to be based on (or in large part on) such scores, especially given some researchers are calling for reliability coefficients of.85 or higher to make such decisions (Haertel, 2013; Wasserman & Bracken, 2003).

Reliability coefficients:.79 -.94 for four major components and.95 -.98 for total scores; alternate form:.62 -.82 for components and.86 -.88 for total scores

The index was developed using a principle components analysis and alpha reliability coefficients.

Due to the ordinal and categorical nature of the response options, reliability was assessed using polychoric correlation - based version of the reliability coefficients.45 These analyses suggested satisfactory internal consistency for the SDQ total difficulties scale (α = 0.86) and for all subscales (α emotional problems = 0.82, conduct problems = 0.71, hyperactivity — inattention = 0.76, peer problems = 0.75 and prosocial behaviours = 0.77).

The SESBI - R and ECBI have been shown to have high internal consistency for both Intensity (α = 0.98, α = 0.95) and Problem scales (α = 0.96, α = 0.93).54 Reliability coefficients at 12 - week intervals for SESBI - R and ECBI Intensity (r = 0.94 and r = 0.80) and Problem scales (r = 0.98 and r = 0.85) are also high.54 A reduction in score indicates fewer and / or less problematic disruptive behaviours.

Interrater reliability coefficients were 0.97 for both episodes and days of binge eating.

The alpha reliability coefficients are relatively high for all scales (Md = 91).

Reliability coefficients indicate that all measures demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliability.

Steger et al. (2006) reported internal consistency reliability coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) ranging between.81 and.86 for Presence and between.84 and.92 for Search subscale.

This measure was found to have a mean alpha coefficient of.90 and test — retest reliability coefficients ranging from.73 to.86 (Spielberger).

The results showed a valid and reliable scale with robust reliability coefficients that will use it to measure perceptions of quality in the relationship, and so contribute to research in psychology to reach an understanding of the nature of the duration, maintenance, repair, or even breaking them.

Test — retest reliability coefficients between 0.11 and 0.50 have been reported for the DICA - IV (Reich et al., 1995).

Moreover, the reliability coefficients of the women's data for the masculinity and femininity subscales were.80 and.66, respectively.

Equating security with both the presence of positive qualities of relationships as well as the absence of negative insecure qualities may have confounded the concept of security in the subscale, thus accounting for the lower reliability coefficients.

Diagnostic decisions were reviewed by the clinical rating team, with best - estimate judgments based on all available information.26 Orvaschel25 reported excellent κ value reliability coefficients for major depression and dysthymia in childeren.

The psychometric properties of the revised scale appear adequate as demonstrated by good internal reliability coefficients, high test - retest reliability, and effective discriminatory power.

Interrater reliability coefficients range from.62 to.75 (Assessment of children: Cognitive applications, 2001).

Another limitation due to measurement issues is that the reliability coefficients for two of the parenting dimensions (structure, α =.68; control, α =.69) are below the usual standard of.70.

The CBCL and YSR have good construct validity and acceptable test — retest reliability coefficients among the subscales.

However, κ reliability coefficients of blinded psychology interns who observed the assessments had sound psychometric properties, κ =.87.

The Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) was employed to compute descriptive statistics and reliability coefficients (Cronbach's alphas) for various questionnaires.

Not exact matches

Kappa indices and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to assess reliability, and bias factor and mean differences were calculated to assess validity.

In addition, a test — retest reliability trial (n = 34) for energy expenditure performed in our laboratory showed an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.97 [25].

When assessing maximal knee angle (flexion), mean power output in the concentric phase a squat exercise, and vastus lateralis EMG amplitude, the test - re-test reliability measured by the coefficient of variation (COV) ranged between 5.3 — 7.8 %, which suggests that these measurements are comparatively consistent but not perfectly replicable.

Reliability of the MRI measurements was assessed as intra-measurer reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) Model Reliability of the MRI measurements was assessed as intra-measurer reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) Model reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) Model (2, 1)[35].

While Cronbach's alpha coefficients are reported between 0.55 - 0.95 for subscales, only the one subscale was below.70 with many showing very good to excellent reliability.

Intraclass correlation coefficients, which examined interrater reliabilities of the

Coefficient alpha reliability across various childhood samples ranged from.71 to.87.