Sentences with phrase «reliability coefficients ranged»

This measure was found to have a mean alpha coefficient of.90 and test — retest reliability coefficients ranging from.73 to.86 (Spielberger).

Interrater reliability coefficients range from.62 to.75 (Assessment of children: Cognitive applications, 2001).

Not exact matches

When assessing maximal knee angle (flexion), mean power output in the concentric phase a squat exercise, and vastus lateralis EMG amplitude, the test - re-test reliability measured by the coefficient of variation (COV) ranged between 5.3 — 7.8 %, which suggests that these measurements are comparatively consistent but not perfectly replicable.

Coefficient alpha reliability across various childhood samples ranged from.71 to.87.

Lead assessors (K.A.C. and A.M.M.) were trained on interview measures by the instrument developers or by an approved trainer, and then trained, supervised, and evaluated for reliability across assessors (κ statistic or intraclass correlation coefficient for all ratings ranged from 0.74 to 1.00).

Steger et al. (2006) reported internal consistency reliability coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) ranging between.81 and.86 for Presence and between.84 and.92 for Search subscale.

The consistency coefficients ranged from 0.75 to 0.90; reliability was highest regarding «affective well - being» and lowest regarding the coping subscales.

Test - retest reliability of the T - CMDQ was satisfactory; Kappa coefficients, which ranged between 0.56 — 0.97 across the three scales, indicated moderate to almost perfect agreement between test - retest responses across body parts.

Results showed high level of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient α = 0.90, test retest reliability ranged from r =.73 to r =.96 (ps <.01), item total correlation varying from r =.50 to r =.74 (ps <.01) and factor loading ranged from.39 to.73.

Raters were 4 predoctoral psychology graduate students who developed reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.26 - 0.90, generally 0.62 - 0.90) after approximately 40 hours of training.

Like the STAI trait, the CES - D is a reliable assessment with alpha coefficients of internal consistency ranging from.80 to.90 and a 2 - week to 1 - year test — retest reliability ranging from.40 to.70 (Eaton et al.).

Internal reliability of the instrument is good with Cronbach's α - coefficients ranging from 0.67 for «powerful others» to 0.77 for «internal».

An early study of the psychometric properties of the MBI: TAC suggests good reliability in terms of good overall agreement (r =.81) and substantial agreement for the individual domains (intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from.60 to.81)(Crane et al. 2013).

A high degree of inter-rater reliability was established on primary diagnoses and subthreshold diagnoses (kappa coefficient = 0.92; range: 0.62 to 1.00; Göttken et al., 2014).

Reliability estimates were found to be acceptable to excellent by using McDonald's omega coefficient ranging from.65 to.92.

The questionnaire reliability expressed as Cronbach alpha coefficients ranged from.68 (for Self - Rating Scale) to.80 (for Dyadic Relationships scale).