The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit historically has afforded litigants substantial leeway in applying economic theory to establish damages in patent infringement cases, as long as the theories are based on
reliable economic evidence and establish direct causation of loss.
Not exact matches
Suffice it to say that the improvement in new unemployment claims strikes me as a legitimately hopeful development, but there is too much short - term noise, and inconsistency with other
economic evidence (
reliable leading indicators, falling tax withholdings) to draw a convincing signal.
«The real increases are likely to come in 2009, which will provide clear
evidence of an
economic downturn and will provide a more
reliable forecast as to the real effects of the current pressures and how long that downturn is likely to last.»