To the extent that the state exam is a valid and
reliable measure of student achievement, improved test scores indicate improved achievement; the two possible school responses appear one and the same.
For instance, performance on infrequent statewide assessments does not capture all dimensions of student learning and classroom outcomes.38 Further, the majority of teachers work in grades or subject areas to which state assessments do not apply, which poses a challenge in defining valid and
reliable measures of student achievement.
Not exact matches
Schools Minister Nick Gibb said his statement to the House
of Commons that: «We (DfE) want new GCSEs to set expectations which match those
of the best education systems in the world, with rigorous assessment that provides a
reliable measure of students»
achievement.
The
achievement gains based on that
measure were more
reliable measures of a teacher's practice (less variable across different classes taught by the same teacher) and were more closely related to other
measures, such as classroom observations and
student surveys.
Annually
measures, for all
students and separately for each subgroup
of students, the following indicators: Academic
achievement (which, for high schools, may include a
measure of student growth, at the State's discretion); for elementary and middle schools, a
measure of student growth, if determined appropriate by the State, or another valid and
reliable statewide academic indicator; for high schools, the four - year adjusted cohort graduation rate and, at the State's discretion, the extended - year adjusted cohort graduation rate; progress in achieving English language proficiency for English learners; and at least one valid,
reliable, comparable, statewide indicator
of school quality or
student success; and
The
Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) project, which will be implemented over the next two academic years, seeks to develop an array of measures that will be viewed by teachers, unions, administrators, and policymakers as reliable and credible indicators of a teacher's impact on student achi
Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) project, which will be implemented over the next two academic years, seeks to develop an array
of measures that will be viewed by teachers, unions, administrators, and policymakers as reliable and credible indicators of a teacher's impact on student achi
measures that will be viewed by teachers, unions, administrators, and policymakers as
reliable and credible indicators
of a teacher's impact on
student achievement.
The bill replaces AYP standards with a requirement for states to annually
measure all
students and individual subgroups by: (1) academic
achievement as
measured by state assessments; (2) for high schools, graduation rates; (3) for schools that are not high schools, a
measure of student growth or another valid and
reliable statewide indicator; (4) if applicable, progress in achieving English proficiency by English learners; and (5) at least one additional valid and
reliable statewide indicator that allows for meaningful differentiation in school performance.
I'm not optimistic that anyone will be able to come up with a valid and
reliable measure of individual principals» contributions to
student achievement anytime soon.
By developing valid and
reliable Common Core math
measures, educators stand a much better chance
of appropriately responding to
student needs to boost
achievement on PARCC and SBAC Common Core math summative assessments.
Each
of those
measures, the earlier papers stated, had positive and negative traits; some were more
reliable over time but less predictive
of how much teachers would improve their
students»
achievement.
This committee will provide feedback to Smarter Balanced staff, work groups, and contractors to ensure that the assessments provide valid,
reliable, and fair
measures of achievement and growth for
students with disabilities.
The
measures of student achievement used must be valid,
reliable and appropriate for this use and for the
student population assessed.
There is only one
reliable measure of overall
student achievement in the United States: the National Assessment
of Educational Progress, administered biannually to a representative sample
of students by the U.S. Department
of Education.
Another important finding
of the study was that
student surveys produced more
reliable results from year to year than did objective
measures of student achievement gains or classroom observations.53 In other words,
student survey results were more stable.
The benchmark
of excellence in
achievement testing for more than 80 years, Stanford 10 provides
reliable data to help
measure student progress toward content standards and high expectations.