Are valid and
reliable measures of student progress and meet other requirements now in Sec. 1111 (b)(3) of Title I. [i]
Not exact matches
Alternatively, there are many
reliable interim assessments to
measure student growth, such as the Northwest Evaluation Association's
Measures of Academic
Progress (MAP) that can be given every nine weeks and that
measure growth no matter how long a
student attends a virtual school.
Beginning in the 2010 - 2011 school year, for each school identified for preliminary registration review pursuant to subparagraphs (ii) and (iii)
of this paragraph, the local school district shall be given the opportunity to present to the commissioner additional assessment data, which may include, but need not be limited to, valid and
reliable measures of: the performance
of students in grades other than those in which the State tests are administered; the performance
of limited English proficient
students and / or other
students with special needs; and the
progress that specific grades have made or that cohorts
of students in the school have made towards demonstrating higher
student performance.
Annually
measures, for all
students and separately for each subgroup
of students, the following indicators: Academic achievement (which, for high schools, may include a
measure of student growth, at the State's discretion); for elementary and middle schools, a
measure of student growth, if determined appropriate by the State, or another valid and
reliable statewide academic indicator; for high schools, the four - year adjusted cohort graduation rate and, at the State's discretion, the extended - year adjusted cohort graduation rate;
progress in achieving English language proficiency for English learners; and at least one valid,
reliable, comparable, statewide indicator
of school quality or
student success; and
The bill replaces AYP standards with a requirement for states to annually
measure all
students and individual subgroups by: (1) academic achievement as
measured by state assessments; (2) for high schools, graduation rates; (3) for schools that are not high schools, a
measure of student growth or another valid and
reliable statewide indicator; (4) if applicable,
progress in achieving English proficiency by English learners; and (5) at least one additional valid and
reliable statewide indicator that allows for meaningful differentiation in school performance.
Earlier this year, weeks before
students were to take the state's standardized test, New York Commissioner
of Education MaryEllen Elia traveled around touting the state's exams as a
reliable way to
measure students»
progress on New York's learning standards, gave teachers a chance to vet the questions, and then tossed out time limits on the test.
Assessment professionals are clear that single test scores are not
reliable or adequate
measures of student progress and should not be used for high - stakes decisions.
One major vendor
of value - added
measures (i.e., SAS as in SAS - EVAAS) long has held that the tests need only to have 1) sufficient «stretch» in the scales «to ensure that
progress could be
measured for low - and high achieving
students», 2) that «the test is highly related to the academic standards,» and 3) «the scales are sufficiently
reliable from one year to the next» (see, for example, here).
Examples
of outcome data that are also appropriate and necessary to assess teacher effectiveness are
students» individual growth and
progress as
measured on valid and
reliable standardized instruments, teacher made tests that aligned with the curriculum,
student performance demonstrations in a variety
of media, and portfolios
of student work.
Examples
of outcome criteria that are also appropriate and necessary are
students» individual growth and
progress as
measured on valid and
reliable standardized instruments, teacher - made tests that are aligned with the curriculum,
student performance demonstrations in a variety
of media, and portfolios
of student work.
That will open the way for fair,
reliable measures of assessing teachers, including the
progress of their
students, he said.
Merit's Tryouts and Finals (i.e. pre-tests and post-tests) are
reliable measures of student knowledge and
progress attained.
The instructional effectiveness component offers educator ratings and
reliable and valid
measures of student progress for both state - and non-state-tested content areas and contains an Evaluation Score Compiler that compiles ratings,
student performance and other information into one overall evaluation score.
Although the computer - adaptive Smarter Balanced Assessment remains unproven and developmentally - inappropriate, proponents
of the controversial test have been unable to demonstrate that SBAC is a psychometrically valid or
reliable measure of student academic
progress, let alone college - and career - readiness.
There is only one
reliable measure of overall
student achievement in the United States: the National Assessment
of Educational
Progress, administered biannually to a representative sample
of students by the U.S. Department
of Education.
The benchmark
of excellence in achievement testing for more than 80 years, Stanford 10 provides
reliable data to help
measure student progress toward content standards and high expectations.