High academic standards, including the Common Core standards, need to be aligned with strong curricula and validated through
reliable systems of assessments that fairly and accurately reflect the performance of students, schools, and school districts.
Not exact matches
Standardized
Assessment of Concussion or «SAC», Sport Concussion
Assessment Tool Version 3 or «SCAT3», the Balance Error Scoring
System or «BESS», King - Devick Test», Maddocks» questions) already shown by studies to be
reliable in making the initial remove - from - play decision, or one
of a number
of new
assessment screens being developed and tested.
Those who scored the
assessments reached high levels
of agreement, suggesting that the
assessment scoring
system made sense and could be used in a
reliable manner.
Schools Minister Nick Gibb said his statement to the House
of Commons that: «We (DfE) want new GCSEs to set expectations which match those
of the best education
systems in the world, with rigorous
assessment that provides a
reliable measure
of students» achievement.
The 2015 field test
of a prototype established that the Institute's model
of assessment of principals» work is both valid and
reliable, critical for any certification
system and achieves the goals
of being customisable and manageable.
As full implementation
of both the teacher and principal evaluation
systems looms for September 2013, it is imperative that boards
of education, district leaders, and the DOE ensure that principals and teachers have a viable curriculum based on the Common Core Standards; valid and
reliable assessment tools to measure growth in every subject area (tested and nontested); and time to work in professional teams to set growth targets, analyze data, and provide the appropriate instructional interventions for every student.
The pursuit
of high - quality principal
assessment reached a milestone in 2006 with the development
of the Vanderbilt
Assessment of Leadership in Education, or VAL - ED, a research - validated process created by a team from Vanderbilt University and the University
of Pennsylvania, and supported by Wallace as an effort to address the lack
of valid and
reliable principal evaluation
systems.
The Field Test is a trial run
of the
assessment system that helps ensure the
assessments are valid,
reliable, and fair for all students.
SBAC intends to be a
system of valid,
reliable, and fair next - generation
assessments in English language arts / literacy (ELA / literacy) and mathematics for grades 3 - 8 and 11.
To ensure that the results
of assessments are both valid and
reliable, teachers should consider using a simple data - entry
system to track student progress toward learning goals.
Promoting the inclusion
of language - minority students in culturally and linguistically relevant
assessment systems which, to the extent practicable, assess students in a language and form most likely to yield accurate and
reliable information.
Based on rigorous research reviewed by the National Center on RTI at the American Institutes for Research, the authors highlight several recommendations for implementing RTI with fidelity: 1) Institute a continuum
of instructional supports for students through a multi-level prevention
system, including primary prevention through high quality core instruction in the classroom, secondary prevention through supplementary interventions
of moderate intensity for students most at risk, and tertiary prevention through individualized interventions for those who do not respond to secondary prevention approaches; 2) employ universal screening through brief, valid and
reliable assessments; and 3) monitor student progress using research - based
assessment tools.
I might point out two conundrums re our API
system: (1) Re composition
of an API, while many folks (including me) support a reduction in weight for
assessment data contributing to an API, the problem is finding or developing valid and
reliable measures to contribute to an API to replace the current
assessment data weights.
The paper considers the necessary components
of a prospective event attribution
system, reviews some specific case studies made to date (Autumn 2000 UK floods, summer 2003 European heatwave, annual 2008 cool US temperatures, July 2010 Western Russia heatwave) and discusses the challenges involved in developing
systems to provide regularly updated and
reliable attribution
assessments of unusual or extreme weather and climate - related events.
His research goals include improving accuracy
of resource
assessment, obtaining
reliable uncertainty estimation and modelling wake effects and applying satellite derived winds in resource
assessment systems.
If this is the best such land area surface temperature
assessment system on the planet (covering, as well, a broad range
of metropolitan, suburban, and rural areas), and the quality
of the
system is now proven to be demonstrably more prone to error than had been previously assumed — with the preponderance
of error shown to produce the impression
of warming in excess
of real conditions prevailing — what may be reliably inferred about surface temperature monitoring
systems data from even less
reliable thermometers all over the rest
of the world?
Highly
reliable and analytical with working knowledge
of business development, risk
assessments, compliance monitoring and reporting, and design, installation and operation
of remedial action
systems, demonstrates excellent project management skills and ability to effectively multi-task several complex assignments within tight deadlines.
Areas
of Expertise: * Dependable, highly
reliable * Network design * Network and
systems security * VoIP integration * Cost benefits analysis * Data Integrity / Data Recovery * Risk
assessment / impact analysis * Contingency planning
The attachment
system is a composite paradigm for understanding relationship processes, traditionally assessed by valid and
reliable interview, projective, or self - report measures (Ravitz et al., 2010), but with a limited ecological validity in the
assessment of real attachment behaviors.
Likely many readers will take this to mean that employment
of reliable character
assessment systems for any purposes is unwise or premature.