Sentences with phrase «relief application under»

The first interim relief application under new CAT Rules: Flynn Pharma Limited v Competition and Markets Authority [2017] CAT 1 (19 January 2017)

Not exact matches

A group of California districts seeking relief from federal mandates under the No Child Left Behind Act have proposed implementing its new system for school improvement this fall, assuming its updated application is approved by July, officials said Tuesday.

Whenever an action has been commenced in any court of the United States seeking relief from the denial of equal protection of the laws under the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution on account of race, color, religion, or national origin, the Attorney General for or in the name of the United States may intervene in such action upon timely application if the Attorney General certifies that the case is of general public importance.

Amendments to the Bankruptcy Code enacted in to the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 require the application of a â $ means testâ $ to determine whether individual consumer debtors qualify for relief under Chapter 7.

This includes applications for interim relief in support of arbitrations (e.g. anti-suit injunctions); seeking or resisting enforcement of domestic or foreign awards under the New York Convention; and challenging or defending awards under sections 67, 68 and 69 of the 1996 Act.

Acted in an LMAA arbitration involving a dispute over control of English ship - owning companies operated as vehicles for joint venture between Greek parties, plus related Court applications for interim relief under s. 44 of the Arbitration Act 1996

cases invoking the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court, whether in relation to children (wardship) or incapacitated or vulnerable adults; and international cases involving applications for relief under either the Hague Convention or Brussels II bis.

In addition to having been instructed in major arbitrations, such as the Bermudan - based arbitration relating to the reinsurance of Arthur Andersen following the collapse of Enron and WorldCom, and Elektrim SA's long running dispute with Vivendi Universal over Polish telecommunications, he has particular expertise in relation to inter relief applications to the Court in relation to heavy arbitrations such as ETI Euro Telecom V Republic of Bolivia [2008](no pre-emptive relief in aid of an ICSID arbitration); Elektrim SA v Vivendi [2007] 1 Lloyd's Rep 693 (s. 68 of AA 1996 and awards obtained by fraud); Elektrim v Vivendi [2007] 2 Lloyd's Rep 8 (injunction to restrain arbitration continuing) Telenor East Holding II AS v Altimo Holdings & Investments Ltd (multi-billion dollar shareholder dispute — interim injunction under s. 44 of the AA 1996); Steadfast v Baker Hughes (s. 9 (3) step in the action preventing a stay in favour of arbitration) and enforcement of arbitral awards (Yukos v Rosneft: US$ 500m and Yukos v Russian Federation US$ 50 billion.

Applications for injunctive relief, delivery up of documents or assets and disclosure of information under Insolvency Act powers

As a pupil, Zac was also involved in: R (on the application of RWE Generation UK Plc) v Gas and Electricity Markets Authority [2016] 1 CMLR 17, a challenge against a decision modifying the charges imposed on users of the National Grid (as a pupil assisting Gerard Rothschild); Speed Medical Examination Services Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice [2015] EWHC 3585, a judicial review challenging reforms to the process for handling whiplash claims (as a pupil assisting Gerard Rothschild); and an application for interim relief by a company that had been redesignated under a European Union sanctions regime (as a pupil assisting Maya Lester).

Financial claims under Sch 1 of the Children Act 1989 are likely to be brought into procedural line with ancillary relief applications at some time in the future.

«[45] Given that s 24 and s 24A MCA 1973 is a barred route to relief at an interim stage, I am unable to conclude that an application brought under a generic procedural rule (rule 20 FPR 2010) can deliver a result which is specifically prohibited within the claim before the court.

The training was facilitated by the Connecticut Bar Association Young Lawyers Section, Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Robinson + Cole, and Statewide Legal Services for attorneys interested in representing victims of domestic abuse applying for civil restraining orders (applications for relief from abuse) under Conn..

A applied in 2002 under s. 34 (2) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27 («IRPA»), for ministerial relief from the determination of inadmissibility, but his application was denied in 2009.

In his presentation, Mr. Giaimo covered the process of obtaining zoning relief in Massachusetts (both legal and practical considerations), how to analyze a project to determine what zoning relief is required, how to prepare and file an application for a variance or special permit, how to prepare for and represent an applicant at a hearing, and procedures and other issues related to zoning decisions under Massachusetts law and practice.

Cullen Investments Ltd v Brown [2017] EWHC 2793 (Ch) Application under section 1157 of the Companies Act 2006 for relief from liability for breach of duty arising from a director's failure to obtain authorisation for a conflict of interests

Sally has provided technical assistance, trainings, and facilitation to groups on local, state, and national levels and has co-authored a number of publications including The U Visa: Obtaining Status for Immigrant Victims of Crime (ILRC), The VAWA Manual: Immigration Relief for Abused Immigrants (ILRC), Immigration Benchbook for Juvenile and Family Court Judges (ILRC), and Application of Protection Remedies for Victims of Domestic Abuse, Human Trafficking, and Crime under U.S. Law to Persons Physically Present in the U.S. Territories (Family Violence Prevention Fund).

Advising and representing in court in respect of relief under s. 44 Arbitration Act 1996 and applications for freezing injunction and security for costs.

The application judge accepted the argument of the respondent that the application had to be dismissed on the ground that the application was not properly brought under rule 14.05 because the request for a mandatory order was not ancillary to a claim for relief.

The application had been properly founded under subrule 14.05 (3)(h), no material facts in dispute, and under subrules 14.05 (3)(d) and (g), the determination of rights following the interpretation of a contract and relief ancillary to those rights.

They can not touch an application under the Children Act 1989 unless relief is sought without notice, no ticketed judge is available and the order is limited in time until hearing before a ticketed judge.

In Summit Navigation Ltd v Generali Romania [2014] EWHC 398 (Comm), Mr Justice Leggatt gave guidance on how the courts should treat applications for relief from sanction under CPR Pt 3.9.