I lump all of those things in with
religion as beliefs that are not supported by evidence.
religion as a belief is fine..
Yet so entrenched is the concept of
religion as belief in authoritative, ready - made doctrines that when that notion is challenged the whole edifice of religion may be rejected, as in traditional naturalistic humanism or the more bizarre «radical theologies» currently in vogue.
Religion as identity T Jeremy Gunn, in the Harvard Human Rights Journal (Volume 16, Spring 2003) remarked that religion may take three forms: «
religion as belief... identity... [or] way of life.»
Not exact matches
The corporation, they say, is «merely an inanimate vessel,» and
as such it can not have
beliefs or exercise a
religion.
«Émile Durkheim understood
religion not
as belief in the supernatural (
as the popular conception would have it), but
as a system of
beliefs and practices relating to sacred things.
It also means that morality provisions can not prevent employees from supporting a political party or practicing a specific
religion, for example (although some employers, such
as denominational school boards, have argued successfully that their religious
beliefs allow them to hold employees to a different moral standards).
@Yakobi try again,... how about 1/3 fallen angels (now called demons) making up
religions /
as well
as belief of atheism to be worshiped directly / indirectly
as God?
Pretty sad when a society allows
religion and god
beliefs to be taught
as facts.
true but atheist never killed anyone or started wars or try to make laws restricting rights based on their
beliefs as all the other stupid
religions do... thats the problem.
Most Atheists would argue that they do not fall into either of those definitions,
as they reject
religion and they generally demand that
belief is based on proof.
What I have a problem with is a leader who preaches his faith to me, and expects me to have similar
beliefs as him, and follow the rules of his
religion.
Explaining
religion as a mental illness relies on your
belief in science.
We will need shared
beliefs and values, whether or not they qualify
as religion.
Science is not influenced by
belief as you suggest because many scientists with different
beliefs validate the experiments, unlike
religion which is pure
belief with no evidence.
Well that's an ironic claim seeing
as half of the Christian
belief system was taken from other earlier
religions.
So don't say that
religion is dumb, enjoy your own mind and
beliefs as we all do who worship him and Thank him everyday for anything and everything that he has given us.
Admittedly this particular thread is relatively tame compared to some I've seen, but I'm always amazed at the degree to which those who practice the
religion known
as «Atheism» feel a compulsion to foist their
beliefs on others.
Get over your militant crusade to enforce your own
religion (the
belief that there is no God is a
belief, and therefore the foundation of the atheist
religion) on everyone and let them choose to believe
as they wish.
So, using simple logic that I assume you would be able to perform (since you feel you are superior), atheism can be defined
as a
religion, in that it is a
belief system and worldview (i.e: a
religion).
Perhaps you can disprove certain
beliefs, such
as the «young earth» idea, but at the core level science and
religion are not in conflict.
They have no tolerance for any other
belief or
religion and will kill anyone who does not believe
as they do.
My father is Catholic
as well
as my husband so I have respect for that specific
religion but have my own
beliefs in certain aspects of the
religion.
A
belief in God does not prove or disprove one's intelligence, just
as being a member of any particular
religion does not prove or disprove intelligence.
As intelligence increases,
belief in
religion decreases.
There are some who think they must stick to literal
beliefs based on ancient text and those who think their
religion is
as pliable
as silly puddy.
You might not understand that non-Mormons do not believe in your
religion and are OFFENDED by your
beliefs and your practices of trying to Mormanize the dead, particularly those who were killed for not being Christian such
as Anne Frank.
Well none, because the pursuit of money, more broadly understood
as Materialism, and
religion, the
belief in the Immaterial, is really all there is.
Circular religious logic will still never fully justify the fact that
religion asks for special rights and protections, which it gets, and then turns those rights and protections on other groups
as a defense mechanism for when they are accused of discriminating... i.e. «We can choose who we accept and who we don't because of our
beliefs... wait, what... how can you say you will not accept our religious organization, that's religious discrimination!»
one of the definitions of
religion: a cause, principle, or system of
beliefs held to with ardor and faith»
As noted above Atheism is none of these things.
This media trap pits us against each other for the sake of race,
religion, and
beliefs as a distraction from whats really going on.
As more and more children get removed from the old ways of indoctrinating them all with religious
belief from an early age, then atheism will become the norm, and
religion the refuge of the minorities of the mentally ill and the lame seekers of cargo cults.
Could just
as well replace «
religion» with any set of
beliefs / ideas you disagree with.
they are both
religions,
as religions are described
as people sharing a common
belief system.
then you use faith in your
beliefs the same
as any
religion and yes you do have a
belief it is that there is no god, that is not absence of believing that is the presence of a
belief system
Your «Americaness» isn't defined by your
religion — and part of being American
as you so frequently harp on, is democracy, freedom of speech and
belief.
Beliefs should be kept personal, but he goes out of his publicize his beliefs which are insubstantial as any re
Beliefs should be kept personal, but he goes out of his publicize his
beliefs which are insubstantial as any re
beliefs which are insubstantial
as any
religion.
Kevin, they need new adherents so thier
religion doesn» y die outThey would hate being the last of a cult that uses myth
as a
belief syste for their salvation, whatever that is.
CNN's
religion blog seems to be a humanist's attempt at dismantling every
religion especially christianity
as America's most prevalent
belief system.
Michael «
As a gay man I appreciate there efforts and support, but I think putting up this sign isn't really the best way to get through to people, all it does is create more hate, intolerance, and separation, I am not a christian but I am very spiritual, and putting up this sign implies that all gay people are atheists which is the furthest thing from the truth, I have no problem with
religion, I have a problem with those who use there
religions to control and hate others, same applies with atheism, if you don't want to believe in anything than fine, just don't push your non
beliefs on me.»
«Well aware that the opinions and
belief of men depend not on their own will, but follow involuntarily the evidence proposed to their minds; that Almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested his supreme will that free it shall remain by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments, or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our
religion, who being lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either,
as was in his Almighty power to do, but to extend it by its influence on reason alone; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil
as well
as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking
as the only true and infallible, and
as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false
religions over the greatest part of the world and through all time.»
Neither qualify
as a
belief system, though in the sense of western
religions.
I am for the elimination of hate, fear and control,
religion is just the catalyst that people use to hate, fear and control, getting rid of
religion won't solve the problem, its like putting a band aid on a severe cut, its temporary, and it just hits the surface, instead we need to go deeper than that to the root cause, I know lots of religious people who don't hate, fear or control, there are also many
beliefs such
as paganism, Buddism, Taoism, which doesn't use hate fear, and self righteousness to condemn others, I think if maybe more of the most major
religions followed there teachings then we wouldn't have
as much problems
as we do.
Dismissing
religion as fairy tales doesn't address the fact that millions of people take their religious
beliefs very seriously and make decisions and take action based upon those
beliefs.
Funny, Brian, that seems to be the underlying
belief of several other major
religions as well.
Neither requires any
belief and it would be difficult to call Taoism
as a whole a
religion although there are some who have made it into that
as well.
Details of
belief as taught or discussed — when the school first opened they taught only
religion, Italian, and mathematics
This hypocritical
belief applies to all lovers of the self, lovers of self - will, lovers of self - interest, lovers of self - rights...... lovers of the
belief in freedom of rights and
religion... making Christ into a «faith» of the same validity
as any other man - made «
religion».
So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged
as much when it comes to
religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there
beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.
Extremists in any
religion may interpret their holy doctrines to produce the suffering, torture and murder of others
as a mechanism to coerce them into adopting their ways of life and their
beliefs.