Sentences with phrase «religion of atheism»

Now it is common for trolls to distract from the subject of an article by Lord Monckton by promoting the religion of atheism.

So how can ANY atheist who accepts evolution claim to be more «moral»?!??!?!?!?!? The religion of atheism is seriously messed up beyond belief.

Typical — That's exactly what the religion of Atheism is.

@Z - Rated — And believers are inundated with the state religion of Atheism throughout their daily life as well.

«the religion of atheism»?

Yes David religion of atheism as some have used the legal definition of religion in law suits in favour of an atheist position.

Yes, including the religion of atheism.

Personally, I find the religion of atheism to be nearly as offensive as traditional religions.

When something can be created out of nothing I will accept the religion of Atheism as being true.

Please keep your religion of atheism to yourself.

The religion of atheism is the final resting place of hypocrites.

Oh masses of the religion of Atheism Speaks Again.

@edgelbraith — i assume you are talking about your religion of atheism and I have to agree that some of you are very childish (in addition to being hateful, petty & devoid of compassion for others) but I don't think it's fair to lump all of you in a group like that.

But you do continue to prove my point, that the only reason your religion of Atheism exist is to because my religious belief in God.

Not exact matches

@Yakobi try again,... how about 1/3 fallen angels (now called demons) making up religions / as well as belief of atheism to be worshiped directly / indirectly as God?

And my «religion» of atheism is quite similar to my hair color of bald.

In doing so, Hitchens summed up the mantras of the new atheism: that «faith is a fairy tale», that it is possible to be «good without God» and that religion is not just false, but evil.

Atheism is the exact opposite of religion.

Atheism is no more of a faith - based religion, than bald is a type of hair style.

The first amendment being regarding freedom to practice one's religion unimpeded vs the poster's wish to disparage that right through expression of HIS faith (that of atheism) and speech.

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

If it's the matter of god, then you're dealing with something other than atheism considering atheism focuses on religion, not the matter of whether god exists or not.

I know a lot of anti-Christian atheists who are unreasonable and irrational and treat atheism as though it were a religion.

Atheism only defines my lack of belief in gods, I will stand up against people pushing their religion in my face or the public square, instead of keeping it in their homes and churches - the only two places it belongs.

That said, Atheism has become a new religion in it's own right, stating with as much certainty as people of «faith», THERE IS NO GOD.

In these constant religion versus atheism debates, that has got to be one of the funniest statements I have ever read.

Theists are so pathetic, since they can't compete against the logic and reason of atheism, they try to drag in down to the level of religion

This isn't about that though, this is more a lesson in how both religion and atheism together can be equally guilty of scamming people out of donations and book sales over trivial and distorted teachings.

Agnosticism is just a step in the direction of Atheism, it does not have the high ground since it gives equal credibility to belief and no belief in religion... they are not equal.

Stalin killed far more people in the name of atheism than anyone everyone else combined who killed in the name of a religion during the 20th century.

And TO the people that says religion is the cause of wars, plz stop it, how about all the wars from atheism?

Viewing religion as how one deals with the meaning of life means atheism and agnosticism can be viewed as a religion.

Atheism isn't a religion, but an argument against religion; thus, it is not a separation of church and state issue.

one of the definitions of religion: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith» As noted above Atheism is none of these things.

If as you say you have talked to others who claim to be Atheist the way you describe it then they are IDIOTS who also don't understand Atheism and yes at that point since they are claiming «no God» to be true, then by all means call their point of view a «religion».

Religions just try to brainwash you about minor things, atheism tries to brainwash you of the most obvious thing!

As more and more children get removed from the old ways of indoctrinating them all with religious belief from an early age, then atheism will become the norm, and religion the refuge of the minorities of the mentally ill and the lame seekers of cargo cults.

Just like any religion there are different types of atheists, some simply don't believe in a «creator» or higher authority, but others use atheism as a shield of intellectuality, safely keeping them from feeling anything.

But to my point that Atheism is a religion by definition Religion: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith Faith: belief or trust: belief in, devotion to, or trust in somebody or something, especially without proof Atheism: unbelief in God or deities: disbelief in the existence of God or deities

It is what has lead me to my veiw that Atheism as a religion, the passion most Atheist have for their point of view from the start you may not fall in this category but I'm sure you know someone that does.The same applies to Christians that freak out on someone and start forcing their view on others, I see that as wrong also if someone asks or brings the debate to you then by all means debate but why be rude how does it help?

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

Since Atheism is the absence of religion & isn't based on faith this ban only applies to religious groups & churches.

See Hitler and jewish extermiation as an example of what happens when atheism reigns supreme and religion is totally eradicated from society.

I admit to a certain amount of hypocrisy where I sometimes favor a more loose definition for some things (like atheism) and a more narrow definition for other things (like religion).

First I want to say that I'm not saying Atheist is a religion in a bad sence or to try and produce some sort of shame only that it falls under the definition of a religion and wondering how it would change your feelings \ view of Atheism even if everybody considered it a religous view, if it's something you believe to be true (that there is no god) what does it matter if someone labels it as your world view?

Secondly there is absolutely nothing in that definition of Atheism that speaks to a «system» of beliefs or any extra descriptions of it being a religion or worldview.

I was raised a Muslim, then went thru a period of atheism due my utter dislike for religion and then became a Catholic due to my personal experiences and my Dad's side of the family who are Catholics.

Atheism is the lack of religion.

In view of its inability to evade assuming self - existence somewhere, «even that which is commonly regarded as the negation of all religion — even positive Atheism comes within the definition» of religion

You can't not say we have a set of beliefs and ignore the practices part to prove that atheism is a religion in of itself.