The fundamentalist charge that secular humanism is
a religion taught in the public schools is, of course, omnibus.
Personally, I'm not sure I want actual
religion taught in public schools.
Not exact matches
And only about one
in three know that a
public school teacher is allowed to
teach a comparative
religion class - although nine out of 10 know that teacher isn't allowed by the Supreme Court to lead a class
in prayer.
The religious are always looking to put
religion front and center
in public life: displays and signs on
public property, laws based upon their religious beliefs, their beliefs
taught as science
in schools, bells on Sunday, etc..
And when has
religion or theology been
taught in the
public schools?
What, then, of
teaching religion in public schools?
With that said,
religion has no place
in public schools unless its being
taught in the same way they
teach Greek Mythology.
There can be neutral
teaching about
religion, which is proper
in American
public schools, although it approaches a spectator sport.
Perhaps your claim is true, but like the big bang and the notion that evolution is a means to species, there is no place
in our
public schools for
teaching religion as science.
Since the Constitution guarantees freedom
in the practice of
religion, no citizen can expect the
public schools to
teach religious values.
If Santa Clausism became the dominant «
religion» of the country, tried to influence the government, inst / itute laws and
public policies and demand that it be
taught in public education - start every
school day with a reading from «Twas the Night Before Christmas» and have «Ho Ho Ho» on your money - I'm just betting that you would have something to say about it on an internet forum and elsewhere!
Major premise: Creationism is
religion rather than science; therefore, according to the principle of separation of church and state, creationism may not be
taught in public schools.
again lmgts,
teaching about
religions is certainly allowed
in public schools.
Public schools are precisely where
religion should not be
taught, unless
in a comparative
religions class.
Even today the
teaching of
religion in public schools is prohibited, although religious observance
in the USA is far higher than
in Europe.
My opinion is if a
school is being funded by the government,
religion of Any type should not be
taught b / c
in public schools there are many different types of people who attend.
Crucifixes are all over Italy
in public places and it will be hard for that person not to notice a crucifix in any public place INCLUDING the public schools there... so I don't know why this person would suddenly sue the government for having a crucifix at a walking or sitting at a PUBLIC school which does not teach religion any more than a walking at a PUBLIC pedestrian where you would probably find more crucifixes as you wa
public places and it will be hard for that person not to notice a crucifix
in any
public place INCLUDING the public schools there... so I don't know why this person would suddenly sue the government for having a crucifix at a walking or sitting at a PUBLIC school which does not teach religion any more than a walking at a PUBLIC pedestrian where you would probably find more crucifixes as you wa
public place INCLUDING the
public schools there... so I don't know why this person would suddenly sue the government for having a crucifix at a walking or sitting at a PUBLIC school which does not teach religion any more than a walking at a PUBLIC pedestrian where you would probably find more crucifixes as you wa
public schools there... so I don't know why this person would suddenly sue the government for having a crucifix at a walking or sitting at a
PUBLIC school which does not teach religion any more than a walking at a PUBLIC pedestrian where you would probably find more crucifixes as you wa
PUBLIC school which does not
teach religion any more than a walking at a
PUBLIC pedestrian where you would probably find more crucifixes as you wa
PUBLIC pedestrian where you would probably find more crucifixes as you walk by.
Only science, not
religion, should be used by our political leaders and
taught in our
public schools in this country.
There need not be an either / or situation, with education divided between Christian
schools that
teach religion and
public schools that exclude it — all
in the name of the separation of church and state.
There's a reason Intelligent Design can't be legally
taught in any
public school in the USA or here
in Canada for that matter, it is to hold up our freedom's of and from
religion.
As an offshoot of
religion, its
teaching in public schools is unconstitutional.
Wertheimer's recent book, Faith Ed:
Teaching about Religion
in an Age of Intolerance, explores the challenges faced by
public schools when incorporating lessons about world
religions into their classrooms, looking at specific examples
in several areas...
The following statements distinguish between
teaching about
religion in public schools and religious indoctrination:
Will barriers be removed to direct funding of private
schools and
teaching religion in public schools?
Yes, you can
teach religion in public schools and, yes, it is legal when using an academic rather than a devotional approach, among other guidelines that can pass muster under the U.S. Constitution.
While
public schools can
teach students about
religion in a civic or historical context, it's against the law for
public school educators to
teach the tenets of any one
religion.
With a Bachelor's
in religion and a Master's
in teaching, both from Whitworth University, your RAD instructor, Michael McKibbin, has served as youth pastor, private Christian
school teacher, and
public school educator.