Personally I would rather have freedom from
religion than freedom of religion.
Not exact matches
That way you're actually pushing
freedom of
religion rather
than condemnation of a specific
religion.
Because without their steadfast support of
freedom of speech and
religion, you run the risk of ending up in a theocracy that only accepts a
religion other
than your own.
I am a Born Again Christian who believes in
freedom of
religion because I trust a Muslim, Buddhist, or Hindu ruler more
than I trust an Atheist who have no moral compass.
In Islam life is more sacred
than anything and should only be shed in self defense, to free the oppressed and to protect the
freedom of
religion.
I also think many well meaning Christians are often distracted by a few social issues (things that I believe are personal and have more to do with our precious American
freedoms than religion) and lose site of the larger picture.
Recently, both President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have been caught using the phrase «
freedom of worship» in prominent speeches, rather
than the «
freedom of
religion» the President called for in Cairo.
In one study of a fundamentalist Protestant academy (Bethany Bible Academy), a Jewish intellectual found the Bethany students more tolerant on issues of race,
religion and
freedom of speech and less concerned with making a lot of money
than their public school peers.
They are more like religious believers under compulsion in a society with an established church
than like believers simply denied the
freedom to exercise their
religion.
Could it not also be looked on in another way, that
religion has caused Sophia to hate herself through the indoctrination and be encouraging women to escape and find
freedom from such
religion to a place of healing from self hatred and community that is more healthy
than the opressive religious forces that are depicted in the picture.
If only Americans really did value their
freedom of
religion... Instead we are perfectly willing to villify and stigmatize people who think differently
than we do.
The dumb christian rednecks in TN don't quite know what to do with religious
freedom when they finally realize it protects
religions other
than theirs.
CHURCHES don't have
freedom of
religion, and more
than corporations have
freedom of speech.
tradition hard to break.the tradition of marriage is older and more meaningful
than any other we know it crosses all
religions and non
religions, and races and cultures.it won't change easy.calling it something else for some people may make it easier to change.but what about those people who want that time tested tradition for themselves for their own self worth.it is a civil right give it to them today.this issues has divided my community as much as any other, but as we have fought to gain right after right, we have lost sight that all deserve the right of
freedom of happiness.No gayness here, just can't fight the battle to keep someone down after being held down
The latest global findings from the Pew Research Center, released two days before Religious
Freedom Day in the United States, show that overall restrictions on
religion in nearly 200 countries and territories have reached a six - year high, and Christians are harassed in more countries
than any other religious group (though Muslims are a close second).
If anything, it shows that there is
freedom of
religion in that space because it conveys the message the FACT that the VAST MAJORITY of the country is Catholic and another viewpoint (other
than secularism) is represented.
Is the Hospital (an organization)'s right to enforce what it believes to be right more valid
than an individual citizen's right to
freedom of
religion and receipt of protections given by Federal law?
The US is a secular country not a christian country.Our country was founded on the principles of
freedom fo
religion and seperation between church and state.I am a muslim, I can tell you that the reason men and women don; t pray in integrated environments is to avoid distractions and to focus on the prayer not because women are less
than men.I personally don; t want to be praying next to a woman because all I'll be thinking about is her and not god.Jews also do the same thing in temples by seperating between men and women in temples.A house of worship is built solely for that purpose, worship!
Religious
freedom holds above all for a private or privatized
religion, one that looks inward rather
than outward.
Fortunately
freedom is supposed to be more important
than religion here in america.
i long with you david... and i myself stumble in my own awkward efforts toward
freedom, and as you said, we know the fact is that it is scary to move into
freedom... because it is unknown... but i see so many on this newfound road to
freedom get trapped in the liminal space of wish - fullfillment community (which actually rather looks like affinity rather
than the hard - won community that comes from communitas)... i'm sure this is going to come off the wrong way, but i'm going to say it anyway: many of the comments seem to be «all about me», and truly that is what
religion is... but not
freedom, not the mission of Jesus where you die to yourself by taking up your cross daily... not being centered on the «other» rather
than yourself...
It is rather to say that they will be found, if at all, elsewhere
than in abstract argument; they will be located in the realm of
religion and politics and the everyday requirements of true
freedom.
We did not start it, but we have been attacked by the Islamic faith that wants nothing more
than to destroy
freedom of
religion in America and implement Sharia law.
My
religion does not persuade me to vote one way or another in an election just because one candidate says god and
freedom more
than the other.
A less
than optimal and still agreeable scenario involves the inclusion of Hanukkah cookies at a class party or even a Hanukkah song at the school's chorus program — usually a previously unknown and completely forgettable musical composition — which, of course, emphasizes the ancient Maccabees» struggle for
freedom of
religion.
For American Jews, the disestablishment clause of the First Amendment which guarantees
freedom from
religion is at least as, if not more, important
than the Constitution's promise of
freedom of
religion.
His defense of the Islamic Cultural Center and Mosque near Ground Zero shows that he's more passionate defending
freedom of
religion,
than he has been in displaying his religiosity.
It is a nontrivial problem in other cultures with other
religions, each claiming that an antique document is a better guide for moral behavior
than mere common sense and the application of simple principle of personal
freedom as long as it doesn't materially hurt others.
Although the majority based their conclusion on his right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions, the partially concurring and dissenting opinions and the judgment as a whole provide an interesting insight into the way
freedom of conscience challenges are to be approached in a secular society where
religion holds less sway
than individual ethical positions on certain issues.
The Saumur case [Saumur v. City Of Quebec [1953] 2 S.C.R. 299], which relied on a defence of
freedom of expression and
religion, established that issuing licences to restrict a person's rights to practise his or her faith was beyond municipal or provincial authority and led to the dismissal of more
than 1,000 bylaw charges.
Carrying more legal weight as a constitutional document
than its predecessor, the Charter provides the guaranteed protection of important rights such as
freedom of conscience,
religion, expression, and association; the democratic right to vote; mobility rights to enter and leave Canada as well as reside anywhere within Canada; legal rights in criminal matters; equality rights against discrimination; and language rights.
But Im not prepared to immediately chalk up all opposition (I'll grant you that some undoubtedly is rooted in islamophobia) to something that is unprecedented in this society, and that would not be tolerated in any context other
than a
freedom of
religion context as «islamophobic».
The Shapeshift.io CEO claimed the
freedom to choose your money is, for many people, more important
than being able to choose a
religion.
[44] His Honour indicated that
freedom of
religion could provide greater protection of Indigenous interests
than has, to date, been accorded:
The Commission submits that in conformity with the guarantee of equality, the rights of indigenous minorities and
freedom of
religion, and consistent with the common law presumption against extinguishment of a proprietary interest and constitutional jurisprudence in relation to the acquisition of property, sub-sec 223 (1) should be construed in a manner which promotes the resilience of native title, rather
than its fragility and susceptibility to destruction forever.
In order to give effect to the guarantee of equality, the rights of indigenous minorities, and
freedom of
religion, the Court should resist approaches which would effectively destroy rather
than recognise and protect native title.