Sentences with phrase «religions in the world say»

Hard to imagine one of the mainstream religions in the world saying, «Oh, well.

Not exact matches

While Cooper is right in saying that «who a reporter votes for, what religion they are, who they love, should not be something [they] have to discuss publicly,» our interconnected, web - dependent world emphasizes that people are listening to everything one says.

«His harshness towards the kuffar (disbelievers) was manifested through deeds that enraged all the nations, religions, and factions of kufr, the entire world bearing witness to this,» said the English - language article which confirmed that Emwazi was killed in a drone strike.

However, in practice, religion uses its supposed knowledge and makes claims about the natural world, sometimes in conflict with what science says.

I know this will draw criticism, but I say if it weren't for all the faithful people of all good religions doing good acts, helping the poor, clothing drives, and on and on, this world would be in a lot worse shape than if just your average aetheist were in charge of helping those who suffer.

I like a piece of this article that said «in that sense Mormonism is the most nonexclusive religion in the Christian world,» Givens says...

I will say it once more... religion is a perception of the world founded in genetics.

First I want to say that I'm not saying Atheist is a religion in a bad sence or to try and produce some sort of shame only that it falls under the definition of a religion and wondering how it would change your feelings \ view of Atheism even if everybody considered it a religous view, if it's something you believe to be true (that there is no god) what does it matter if someone labels it as your world view?

From a book on Werhner Von Braun: around 1975 when illness was advancing, «His desire to see the world of science and technology in full harmony with the world of religion, particularly as it is manifested in Christian faith, grew even stronger,» Ordway says (p. 272).

God says that «good» religion is looking after widows and orphans in their distress and to keep yourself from being polluted by the world.

Just think what you'd be saying if you were raised in another part of the world where the dominant religion is not christianity.

do I need any approval before I practice my religion, do I have to prove my religion before I practice, my holy book further describe that you must carry a gun in 21st century because there is too much crime in this world, but it doesn't say much about if I migrate to another country these rules will still apply, Or I should modified them according to my comfort, like talking in English which is not my religious language wearing pants or not, having education or not, standing in line or not, I am so confused what should I do can someone help me, should I go back to country where my religion originated or back in time ask my guru questions about western world confusion, or just decide by myself what suites me, or preach other develop country that you guys are wrong be peaceful.

They always say «If religion didn't exist, there would be no wars and crimes in the world.»

First, note the particular terms Schweitzer used: he said that the religion of love is not dependent upon belief in a «divine personality» (Gottespersönlichkeit) or «World Sovereign» (Weltherrscher).

That being said I respect that Christianity is one of the most important religion in the western world and therefore at some time I plan to read the Bible.

Here I dare say that the ethical religion of love can exist without the belief in a world ruling divine personality which corresponds to such an ethical religion [«Fromm Sein.

Saying that Jesus came to save us * from * religion might make for Tweetable theology but it is not an accurate representation of what the word means (via the dictionary definition), how it was defined in both the ancient and modern worlds, and how the New Testament presents it.

And yet it is one of the most important tests for office,» said Jose Casanova, an expert in the sociology of religion at Georgetown University's Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs, who also spoke at the release of the survey results.

As Joseph Campbell might have said each religion is true in its own way as a metaphorical expression of the possibility of human experience in the world.

Otherwise they will be like indolent workmen who find no spur to action in a task to be achieved; or else, if a healthy human instinct overrides their hesitancies or the fallacies they derive from a misunderstanding of religion, they will still be a prey to a fundamental division and frustration within themselves, and it will be said that the sons of heaven can not, on the human level, compete with true conviction and therefore on equal terms with the children of this world.

He talks about the «goodness as we possess» (such as altruistic acts) and says that even if religion did no other harm, its carefully nurtured divisiveness is enough to make it «a significant force for evil in the world.»

It is apparent from what has been said that when education and civilization flourished in the Muslim world the distinctively religious aspects of Islamic culture were exalted, and when the civilization was weakened and stagnated religion also suffered.

By saying «God,» religion intends to point toward the divine reality, the chief causative agency in the world, the supreme responsive agency to the world's ongoing process, the ultimate recipient of what is accomplished in the world.

As my friends, family, and readers already know, I have an opinion about nearly everything — religion, politics, theology, entertainment, lifestyle, college football, driving, world affairs, and whether or not that coffee mug in the kitchen cabinet is light gray or light blue (it's light blue, I say!)

She says «The remarkable discovery, announced this week, of ripples in the space - time fabric of the universe rocked the world of science — and the world of religion.»

Your final statement however is possibly the most chilling... You are in effect saying that should churches ever be banned world wide (like that will ever happen in America where the freedom of religion is a basic human right) then mankind no longer has a right to exist.

Scores of people, some of them among the brightest minds of the world, devoted their whole lives to study the religion books in the smallest details and they still didn't say they master it all.

However much we recognize a profound ontological difference between elements of the world, including a fundamental difference between ourselves, many philosophers of religion want to say that God knows and empathizes with human experience in a way similar to divine relativity for several reasons: omniscience, a resolution to theodicy, and ontological unity.

The crisis for religion, he said in The Sacred Canopy and other writings, is how to maintain the «plausibility structure» of traditional religion in a world that does not think religious truth claims are plausible.

the bible talks about the religion of man, verses that of christ, he has not the holy spirit, chris made it very clear who enters heaven, he also said you are either for me or against me, man can not serve two masters, you may know how to read the bible, but without the holy spirit, the truth is hidden from you, they have a form of godlyness, but are without the spirit, they speak wonderful words, but the truth is not in them, many will flock to the anti christ, Obama shows how easy it will be for satan to decieve the world, the bible has a lot to say about the end times, and we are in that area.

The war against terrorism is» more than it is politic for world leaders to say in public» also a war of religion.

The commonly assumed distinctions between the «religious» and the «secular» and between «religion» and «morality» are really very odd, says Smith, and make little sense to people who believe that the world has a story, as in upper case Story.

The major religions of the world teach you not to ask the questions to get at the truth... in fact questioning is the one of the things that they quiet by saying... oh cuz it says so in the bible.

I have every respect to those angels and consider bringing such subject up as disrespect for what those do to our world with their kindness... Those nuns and popes were once my teachers in the kindergarden in Aden Colony of Southern Arabia although I was considered as Muslim from Muslim parents... so you can say I hold for them great respect although we are from different religions beliefs...!

I would like to say a few words about this long debate, first of all today Islam religion reached every in the world from east to west, north to south.

Yeah yeah, you can say that religion is the way to truth but, logically speaking, believing in a god is the incorrect conclusion to reach based on what we know about religion in general and the incompatability between the religion and the real world.

One defender of the faith said, «If man and monkeys, magpies and mackerel, mosquitoes and moles are all alike the descendants of the earth and sea, then is our religion vain and we are without hope and without God in the world.»

«We must retake the discourse among religions and cultures from the hands of the extremists around the world who benefit from hatred and violence,» Rauf said in the statement.

Just as we can't understand why Third World countries repress their masses with religion and control, they can't understand why we can walk around freely saying whatever it is we want to say, where what we choose and believe in what we want to.

As you say you have a degree in World Religions and the History of Science and a postgraduate degree in Representation and Modernity ---------- I just have an associates degree in Church leadership ------ so you misunderstand my lack of education and my ablities to present my views clearly, compared to your abilities, as patronizing -------------- No TIGGY, what I just said THAT IS PATRONIZING you.

@Rachel: Since this campaign is aimed at people who do the things you say you don't, people who wear their religion on their sleeve, poke their noses in where it doesn't belong, try to legislate fundamentalist ideas, and generally want to make the world conform to their ideas no matter how horrible, I have to ask... Why do you care?

George Bernard Shaw Peter L. Berger, the most eminent sociologist of religion in the world today, many of whose sociological works as Berger says «read like a treatise on atheism,» has written a mature and skeptical affirmation of Christianity in his new book Questions of Faith: A...

«This kind of thinking is actually typical rather than atypical in world history,» says Stephen Prothero, a Boston University religion professor and CNN Belief Blog contributor.

Yusuf Qaradawi (the most influential Muslim cleric in the world today, the spiritual head of the Muslim Brotherhood) said: «Islam is not a religion in the common, distorted meaning of the word, confining its scope only to the private life of man.

He says religion relates to one department of life only, one which is in contrast to the world.

At the very outset Bishop Paulose says, «What is important to note is that in spite of the similarities between Marx and Bonhoeffer there is a striking difference which is crucial for our enquiry: Bonhoeffer's critique of religion grew from, and was directed towards, an extraordinary faith in Christ, Lord of the world.

In the foreword to the report Dr Ahmed Shaheed, United Nations Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Religion or Belief said: «Despite global commitments to promote and to protect freedom of religion or belief, the scale of violations remains enormous, with almost 80 per cent of the world's population living in countries with «high» or «very high» levels of restrictions and / or hostilities towards certain beliefs.&raquIn the foreword to the report Dr Ahmed Shaheed, United Nations Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Religion or Belief said: «Despite global commitments to promote and to protect freedom of religion or belief, the scale of violations remains enormous, with almost 80 per cent of the world's population living in countries with «high» or «very high» levels of restrictions and / or hostilities towards certain beliefs.&raquin countries with «high» or «very high» levels of restrictions and / or hostilities towards certain beliefs.»

It amazes me that atheist will say that religion is the cause of hate and violence in the world and then as they post comments that are full of hate and scorn for other humans.

As Steven Weinberg says: «Over many centuries science has weakened the hold of religion, not by disproving the existence of God but by invalidating arguments for God based on what we observe in the natural world.

Well said, and I tihnk this is why religion as a whole is, thankfully, declining in almost all areas of the world.