Another thing is that atheists on average know more about
religions than believers do.
They were right, Atheists know more about
religion than believers do.
Not exact matches
In fact, paper currencies and instruments (or electronic ink on paper) probably have more «
believers»
than all of the
religions in the world combined.
It is these aspects of the church: control of the finances of members, control over all aspects of interpersonal relationships, segregation of
believers into levels of worthiness, not to mention the dubious credibility of the sole person who made up the entire
religion... That make Mormonism look a whole lot more like a cult
than a
religion.
Ironically, persecution strengthened Chinese
believers» faith and determination, and
religion eventually proved stronger
than its opposition.
If prayer did anything other
than waste time, there would only be one
religion and there would only be
believers.
They are more like religious
believers under compulsion in a society with an established church
than like
believers simply denied the freedom to exercise their
religion.
I find that atheists tend to know more about
religion than most
believers — or at least that is true of Christians in the US.
Actually, if
religion is defined in terms of what you are compelled to do as a
believer,
than I would say his
religion is pretty real.
An atheist has more faith
than any
believer in any other
religion.
There was much greater emphasis on the need to undermine
religion by social and economic action rather
than by direct confrontation with religious institutions and
believers.
Your article seems to relay the idea that being without
religion is easier
than being a
believer.
Bob... I think I am as unconvinced as you are about the veracity of claims that are made by some
believers as to what God is doing or about to do in their lives, but I've come to think that
religion or the search for meaning is much larger
than any particular expression of any one tradition.
The typical atheist knows more, and has reflected far deeper about
religion than «
believers».
I don't have a precise count, but it seems to me that the über -
believers «Run and Hide Herbie» and G - D are much more successful at opening people's eyes to the stupidity of
religion than I've been.
That expression may seem too strong — but only if we think the mystical is the exceptional rather
than a spiritual experience that belongs to the essence of
religion and remains accessible to all
believers.
Both of them are now
believers, which is their choice as adults, but they fully understand my position on
religions and we sometimes have some wonderful discussions on the subject, but I usually just get them confused because I know so much more about the Christian faith
than they do because I have studied it from a secular point of view.
Qualities which are purported to make
religions «unique» are usually talking points designed to convince the
believers that their own faith is more objectively true and real, more fulfilling,
than others» - this is essentially religious intolerance with a positive spin instead of a negative one.
Atheism is growing faster
than any other category of «
believer» or
religion.
Whenever I debate a
believer, in a calm rational debate it usually devolves into the person defending
religion getting angry because he or she can not simply answer any question other
than by saying stuff along the lines of, «well our brains are too small to understand» or «god works in mysterious ways» or my personal favorite «God will judge you for you unbelieving ways».
The alarmism of AGW
believer's
religion of Warmanism has become a sermon on the need to save the planet and who better to deliver such a disingenuous sermon
than Al Gore the country's hypocritical Orwellian - in - Chief?