We can not force
religious convictions upon the world instead those convictions must be lived out.
Not exact matches
Our
conviction is rather that the difficulty arises simply from a failure resolutely and consistently to found
religious ideas
upon shareable human experiences.
thinks, that the Tigris and the Euphrates have not a common source, that the Dead Sea had been in existence long before human beings came to live in Palestine, instead of originating in historical times, and so on... We are able to comprehend this as the naive conception of the men of old, but we can not regard belief in the literal truth of such accounts as an essential of
religious conviction... And every one who perceives the peculiar poetic charm of these old legends must feel irritated by the barbarian — for there are pious barbarians — who thinks he is putting the true value
upon these narratives only when he treats them as prose and history.
Education based
upon religious convictions is accused of everything from dividing society into warring camps to indoctrinating children in a way that prevents them from achieving autonomy and critical consciousness.
We only regret that Ms. Schnell did not really intend to discriminate, that she did not as a matter of
religious conviction insist
upon a Christian handyman (alright, handyperson).
@Bill — Happened
upon this exchange and it appears you know the answer to the question of when the State can distinguish between genuine
religious conviction and self - serving claims, and so I write this to explore your understanding based on my own...
The most drastic example of the application of this principle is to he seen in the view of religion which underlies the recently published report of the Laymen's Appraisal Commission on Missions.4 In agreement with the opinions of a minority group among the missionaries, it implies the abandonment of the old methods leading to conversion, which are based
upon the
conviction of Christianity's possession of absolute
religious truth.
Once
upon a time, we might consider someone's
religious convictions and the state of their family.
It withdraws protection from the weak and vulnerable, allowing the strong to define the status and rights of the weak; it privatizes matters which, in any legitimate political order, must be public in nature; it sets innumerable roadblocks to the rectification of the problem through mutual deliberation of citizens in legislative assemblies; and it has made what used to be its most loyal citizens —
religious believers — enemies of the common good whenever their
convictions touch
upon public things.