Not exact matches
CNN: My Take: Huge win for
religious liberty at the Supreme Court Wednesday's Supreme Court
decision holding that ministers can not sue their churches for
employment discrimination was a huge win for
religious liberty.
Indeed, the reason that Congress overwhelmingly passed RFRA in the first place (97 - 3 in the Senate, by acclamation in the House) was a disturbing Supreme Court
decision in 1990,
Employment Division v. Smith, which lowered the First Amendment's protections for
religious liberty.
«The government must stay out of hiring and firing
decisions by a
religious organization, even if a minister sues for
employment discrimination, the Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday.
(CNN)- Wednesday's Supreme Court
decision holding that ministers can not sue their churches for
employment discrimination was a huge win for
religious liberty.
We'll analyze the Court's approach in several
decisions affecting public schools - EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch (finding need for
religious accommodation need only be a motivating factor in an
employment decision) and Perez v.
(1) he has a sincere
religious belief, observance or practice that conflicts with an
employment requirement; (2) he informed his employer of the conflict; and (3) the
religious practice was the basis for the adverse
employment decision.
According to this extensive story from the New York Times, «Where Faith Abides, Employees Have Few Rights» (Nicole Bengiveno, 10/9/06), courts have expanded the «ministerial exception» — which gives
religious institutions wide discretion over
employment - related
decisions related to a «core expression of
religious belief» — to apply in situations that do not, on their face, implicate
religious issues.