For a more circumspect look at war, read Blood Rites, which explores the uniquely
religious feelings humans bring to war.
Not exact matches
Such a new ecclesiastical body is designed to allow these pathetic
human beings, who are so deeply locked into a world that no longer exists, to form a community in which they can continue to hate gay people, distort gay people with their hopeless rhetoric and to be part of a
religious fellowship in which they can continue to
feel justified in their homophobic prejudices for the rest of their tortured lives.
I am not
religious or spiritual, but I, like Nyad, can
feel amazed by the
human experience.
Those of the
religious agenda keep on telling themselves that whoever this person that wrote it should be more involved with religion and should keep on pushing the «topic of religion» onto dying people instead of just being a
human being and focusing on the person's
feelings at their last hours on earth.
When the U.S. Muslim community sounds out LOUD and CLEAR, without equivocation, and immediately against all forms of terrorism, including all aggressive
religious intolerance for
human rights, women's right, children, equal protection under the law, the respect for other religions to coexist, the right to free speech, and the ability to separate church from state, IF THEY FINALLY DO THAT AND LOUDLY, then we will begin to
feel comfortable that they are truly embracing American ideals and here to join us, not to oppose, defy, or undermine what we hold dear.
Amazing, such rationality presented by you... oh wait, not really rational to poke fun at your
human being unless your own self esteem is so low that the only means to
feel superior to your fellow
human being is to belittle them for their beliefs... kinda like what the
religious do to you.
Nonetheless,
human beings are naturally
religious when by that we mean that they possess, by virtue of their given ontological being, a complex set of innate features, capacities, powers, limitations, and tendencies that give them the capacity to think, perceive,
feel, imagine, desire, and act religiously and that under the right conditions tend to predispose and direct them toward religion.
The
human existential condition does not require that people be
religious or
feel the need to address and answer such questions — many people appear happy to focus on the present, live as well as they can, and not be bothered by the Big Questions.
Greg: Charles Taylor believes
humans are naturally ordered toward the good, which means they will always
feel a
religious impulse.
Thus a dedicated scientist who
feels, because he is a
human being, the need for something less coldly detached from humanity, may easily be drawn into a
religious cult which is both crude and obscurantist.
Some will thrill to the contempt for the
human; some will
feel a jolt of free - floating
religious awe; some will decide that enough's enough (though most of those are unlikely to have started the novel in the first place).
The
religious ideology would no longer be necessary when its source in
human feelings of finitude and limitation had been overcome by man's success in organizing his world.
thinks, that the Tigris and the Euphrates have not a common source, that the Dead Sea had been in existence long before
human beings came to live in Palestine, instead of originating in historical times, and so on... We are able to comprehend this as the naive conception of the men of old, but we can not regard belief in the literal truth of such accounts as an essential of
religious conviction... And every one who perceives the peculiar poetic charm of these old legends must
feel irritated by the barbarian — for there are pious barbarians — who thinks he is putting the true value upon these narratives only when he treats them as prose and history.
One way of viewing the
religious crisis of our time is to see it not in the first instance as a challenge to the intellectual cogency of Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, or other traditions, but as the gradual erosion, in an ever more complex and technological society, of the
feeling of reciprocity with nature, organic interrelatedness with the
human community, and sensitive attention to the processes of lived experience where the realities designated by
religious symbols and assertions are actually to be found, if they are found at all.
This stress on the primacy of process and the ultimacy of constitutive relations means that, in considering the morphological structure of
religious experience, attention must be directed to its origin in the physical
feelings which comprise the primary mode of
human experience.
As a fusion of physical and conceptual
feelings,
religious experience represents an emergent factor in
human life.
When I reflect on the infinite pains to which the
human mind and heart will go in order to protect itself from the full impact of reality, when I recall the mordant analyses of
religious belief which stem from the works of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud and, furthermore, recognize the truth of so much of what these critics of religion have had to say, when I engage in a philosophical critique of the language of theology and am constrained to admit that it is a continual attempt to say what can not properly be said and am thereby led to wonder whether its claim to cognition can possibly be valid — when I ask these questions of myself and others like them (as I can not help asking and, what is more,
feel obliged to ask), is not the conclusion forced upon me that my faith is a delusion?
thank you... this concept is seemingly so foreign to the
religious... you do good because it gives you the best
feeling in the world to help fellow
human beings... no strings attached, no heaven and hell stuff... just helping out someone who needs help... the
human thing to do...
Later, in Reflections on America, Maritain wrote: «The Founding Fathers were neither metaphysicians nor theologians, but their philosophy of life, and their political philosophy, their notion of natural law and of
human rights, were permeated with concepts worked out by Christian reason and backed up by an unshakeable
religious feeling.»
See Between Man and Man (London: Regan Paul 1947), p. 89) Such communication by a teacher who has a deep
feeling for a
religious tradition often leads students to an encounter with the meanings which speak to
human needs from that tradition.
Crucially important to Meland's enterprise is a recognition of myth as the
felt expression of the depths of
human culture, In his view,
religious faith, and more particularly Christian faith, finds embodiment and expression not only in
religious institutions and individual
religious experience, but in the midst of secular cultures as well, The Judeo - Christian mythos underlies and is formative of the cultural sensibilities of Western men.
God is not to be perceived as an abstract remote deity insensitive to the deepest
religious feelings which grow out of experiences of pain, suffering, death, and
human agony.
The author also states «Yet the spiritual - but - not -
religious outlook sees the
human as one that simply wants to experience «nice things» and «
feel better.»».
They aren't even really
human so you can't discriminate against them...» The fact that the
religious feel this way about atheists is shameful and disgusting but it's true.
But
religious love is only man's natural emotion of love directed to a
religious object;
religious fear is only the ordinary fear of commerce, so to speak, the common quaking of the
human breast, in so far as the notion of divine retribution may arouse it;
religious awe is the same organic thrill which we
feel in a forest at twilight, or in a mountain gorge; only this time it comes over us at the thought of our supernatural relations; and similarly of all the various sentiments which may be called into play in the lives of
religious persons.
Who better than he knew what base things can come from the black depths of the
human heart, dealing as he did with extortioners and prostitutes, the cruelty of the strong and the bigotry of the
religious, and
feeling over all the tyranny of a vast military empire?
The former —
religious experience — need not be highly articulated nor even highly conscious of God as God; it may be vague, diffused, and unformed, yet also a deliverance of what it
feels like to be dependent upon a reality greater than anything
human or natural.
Personal
religious experience and inner
feeling, therefore, began to take precedence over
religious thought and dogma at the very time when traditional Christian doctrines were becoming increasingly out of kilter with the new ideas and advancing
human knowledge of the last two centuries.
He
feels thoroughly satisfied with a
religious attitude derived from the
human imagination because he believes that all men everywhere are naturally good.
What is exciting about religion in art as expressed in painting is the endless evocation of profound
human feelings and the interaction of those
feelings with great
religious symbols and themes.
Early
religious inklings of «another dimension» were
felt especially in those aspects of nature considered important for
human subsistence and survival.
The ruling Swedes might recognize that
religious «
feeling» is a legitimate aspect of
human subjectivity, but they emphatically object when people act on the fantasies produced by this
feeling to the detriment of other people, or when delusionary beliefs impede the achievement of important social objectives.
lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a
religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or
feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the
human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every
religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly
human nature to be part of the group.
Conversely, one who
feels a strong bond with all other
human beings usually has a sense of connection with nature and with all of life, whether or not it is expressed in conventional
religious forms.
In a recent interview with the Washington Post (part of their ominously titled «Voices of Power» series), Secretary of Health and
Human Services Kathleen Sebelius discussed Archbishop Joseph Naumann's request that she not present herself for communion because of her public support for legalised abortion: «Well, it was one of the most painful things I have ever experienced in my life, and I am a firm believer in the separation of church and state, and I
feel that my actions as a parishioner are different than my actions as a public official and that the people who elected me in Kansas had a right to expect me to uphold their rights and their beliefs even if they did not have the same
religious beliefs that I had.
In a general sense, one can speak of four areas of struggle: (i) the system of economic exploitation and social stratification (racial segregation, women's working conditions, unemployment and the new legislation of «flexibility and «deregulation); (ii) the ideology (the way of representing the world, social relations, etc.) that justifies the system — the new ideologies of race superiority, the
religious legitimation of competition and the so - called free market as the only and sufficient way of organizing
human life (iii) the ways in which the consciousness of the oppressed, is led to interject this ideology of domination and to develop a
feeling of self - denial and self - devaluation; (iv) the atomization of the society through the weakening and destruction of neighborhood, workers and local cultural manifestations.
However, there are groups of tamed adherents of secular ideologies and
religious faiths who
feel that in the dialogue between religions and secular ideologies they must find some alternative path to save the positive
human values and what modernity has realized of them through the last three or four centuries.
Whitehead sees the ground or source of purpose, value, order, and novelty — and in
human beings of moral and
religious feeling — as divine.
A few reasons why are
religious people so stupid: — do not understand Sunday is a day off for many people — they
feel it's honorable to post on hobby / interest blogs while at work — do not understand time zones and / or that web sites may be accessed 24/7 by international visitors — do not understand that even within a single time zone
humans may have different sleep habits
Religious conservatives
felt that
humans should not interfere in God's plan, denouncing the growing popularity of the birth - control pill in the 1960s and debating in the 1970s whether «test - tube babies,» produced by in vitro fertilization, would have souls.
«Teddy is a vehicle for the projection of one's
human feelings in the same way god is,» says Perry, who loves
religious art but describes himself as a Christian atheist.
Legatus, You pretend that
human feelings of love, compassion, companionship, etc. — in short, all of the positive emotions displayed by people, are the result of
religious indoctrination.