His sister mercifully lied, saying he had countermanded this order on his deathbed, and so spared
the religious leaders of the nation.
Not exact matches
It ignores the leadership
of civil society, including
religious leaders; the political value
of religious ideas (real theology) in creating a functional future for these
nations; and practices like forgiveness that allegedly prevent the just application
of punishment.
For a Christian
leader to call upon fellow Christians to vote for Christian candidates is not an attack on the principles
of religious freedom established by our
nation's forefathers.
Consider the methods described herein the degradation
of youth through $ ex and drugs, the se - du - ction
of this
nation's media, educational, and
religious inst - i - tutions, the discrediting
of her
leaders and decide tor yourself whether or not they are the very means that have been employed to accomplish these ends.
I personally think religion should not be a factor.No one should ask the candidates what their
religious views are and they should never mention them.Their
religious preferences have absolutely no effect on what type
of leader they will be.Unless they are some kind
of a
religious fanatic.I think it's time for an atheist.There was not a Christian president for over the first 50 years
of our
nations existence.And, I do not think there has been one since.If you look it up you will find not one
of our founding fathers were Christian.Not even Jefferson.I know he wrote the Jefferson bible, but, that's just because he, like the other founding fathers, did not believe Jesus to be
of divine decent.So, he kept his philosophy while removing all the mystical and dogmatic concepts.
As a world
leader for freedom and the protection
of basic human rights, the United States should take every opportunity to advocate for people — including Americans here at home — to think, believe, and act according to their
religious belief whether they belong to a minority or majority religion in their
nation.»
It has become a spiritual dilemma for some
of the
nation's pastors and their parishioners,
religious leaders say.
For example, at one time many
religious leaders in the early days
of our «Christian
nation» and even (some
of our) Founding Fathers believed that people
of African decent were not fully human and used the Bible as proof.
To me, his gift in life is helping to save Catholicism, which is having many problems retaining members throughout the world, especially in Europe, maybe he should become a
religious leader and leave politics to people who actually understand the focus
of the
nation and the world aside from Lucifer.
The British who colonized India had accepted the European concept
of nationhood as constituted by unity in blood and language, «ethnic purity and a single language»; therefore, they said, that «India is not and can never be a
nation... India is a collection
of religious communities... But the unfortunate tragic element was that this British interpretation
of Indian history was also accepted by many
of our national
leaders... So British interpretation plus the shortsightedness
of our own
leaders, not excluding the Mahatma, together resulted in this dreadful phenomenon
of communalism».
Nevertheless, this country is too big and too diverse to seriously expect that everyone walks the same path regarding spirituality, and it's completely reasonable to understand how and why our
nation's President or Presidential candidates would not necessarily share our
religious views, but still be capable
of being great
leaders.
The
nation's biggest evangelical group said Monday that
religious freedom is threatened by American mayors who say Chick - fil - A is not welcome in their cities because
of the restaurant
leader's opposition to gay marriage.
And yet the controversy over Chick - fil - A is a clear sign that
religious liberty is at risk and that this
nation has reached the brink
of tyrannical intolerance from at least some
of our elected
leaders.
Religion might teach
of duties and soften the inherent corruption
of leaders and the governed alike, but the founders knew that the virtue
of the
nation was by no means assured, no matter what
religious commitments its civic
leaders might have.
It must be recognized that in this, not less than in the concept
of the covenant, there was profound ethical content which
religious leaders were not slow to apply for the vitalizing
of the religion
of nation and individual, several
of them commenting on the astonishing fact that Israel was a peculiar treasure
of God.
Jeremy — earlier, you wrote — Dave, Just to riff on the United States example a bit more... When we went to war with Iraq, many
of our
nation's
religious leaders said that this was God's will, and that we needed to bomb Iraq back into the dark ages.
Whenever the
religious leaders of Israel wanted to sensitize the
nation, to call it back into faithfulness and obedience to the Torah, those
leaders turned to the poetry
of metaphor.
Even earlier, those who had given their time and talents for interfaith relations shared a celebrative moment when the United
Nations recognized the importance
of interfaith relations and summoned a conference
of religious leaders in New York just prior to the Millennium summit meeting
of world
leaders in August 2000.
The Southern Baptist Convention voted last summer to back refugee resettlement, and its Ethics and
Religious Liberty Commission
leader Russell Moore recently wrote to Trump: «As a
nation, we must seek to resolve the tension created by these two values — compassion for the sojourner and the security
of our citizens — in a way that upholds both values.»
«Free world
leaders, especially President Obama, should make it clear to President Xi Jinping that these acts
of total disregard for basic human rights and
religious freedom should and will be condemned by all during Xi's visit to the United
Nations and the United States next month.»
Even
religious leaders put their
nation above other
nations, meddling in the political arena, rather than following Jesus example
of being «no part
of the world» and it's nationalistic interests.
(John 15:19) Many
of the
religious leaders adhere to some political agenda, voicing that their particular
nation is blessed by God.
Huge swathes
of populations abandoned the Roman Catholic Church and wars
of religion erupted within and between
nations, as political
leaders made calculations about where their
religious loyalties should lie.
«The death
of this outstanding
religious leader and an icon
of entrepreneurship, philanthropy and humility is a great loss to the
nation.
Buhari therefore called on
religious leaders to work towards the broader goal
of building a strong and unified
nation, and avoid insinuations that could divide the populace, especially along
religious lines.
UNITED AGAINST HATE: LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIALS AND RIVERDALE JEWISH COMMUNITY
LEADERS RALLY AGAINST RECENT WAVE
OF ANTI-SEMITISM Senator Klein highlights the IDC's
Religious Freedom Package aimed at combatting hate crimes Bronx, NY — As anti-Semitic hate crimes sweep the
nation -LSB-...]
[8, 9] In many post-atrocity
nations, as Rosenblatt states,
religious leaders citing various beliefs have objected «to exhumation, autopsy, and other forensic practices, even when the mass graves in question contained crucial evidence
of atrocities committed against their own members.»
Across the
nation,
religious and lay
leaders are creating new schools, new networks
of schools, new governance models for existing schools, new pipelines
of talent, new philanthropic efforts, new public programs, and much more.
The son
of the
nation's most influential
religious leaders, the Priest trained from a young age to combat the forces
of darkness.
A few years ago,
religious and environmental
leaders from all over the world converged at the United
Nations and on college campuses to celebrate the teachings
of de Chardin, who lived for a time at a Jesuit seminary in Hyde Park, N.Y. and whose remains are buried there.