The religious leaders thought they were righteous, but since they kept themselves from sinners, proved that they were only self - righteous.
He doesn't practice it the way
religious leaders thought He should.
Because, as every spouse knows, you always have to top last year's present, Rodong Sinmun got bold and claimed that «even foreign
religious leaders think Kim is comparable to a god.»
Not exact matches
Politicians,
religious leaders, and other public figures emerge to offer «
thoughts and prayers» to those afflicted.
Either way, the severe Twitter backlash to Lakewood's closure suggests that, when it comes to our
religious leaders,
thoughts and prayers are no longer enough.
But I do
think that black
religious leaders have a responsibility, if they can not support gay marriage, to at least support and fight for the secular rights of gay people.
They make people
think that only the
Religious leaders know what is and this is the misleading as ordinary people can know what God Is.
as a living being you are not even able to understand yourself consiouness and believe in
religious leaders to tell you what to
think and not to
think.
It's what your
religious leaders have told you
think.
Terrorists twisted
thinking is being allowed to lead real believers around by the nose while the supposed real
religious leaders are afraid to intervene, or have been replaced by extremist front men.
I personally
think religion should not be a factor.No one should ask the candidates what their
religious views are and they should never mention them.Their
religious preferences have absolutely no effect on what type of
leader they will be.Unless they are some kind of a
religious fanatic.I
think it's time for an atheist.There was not a Christian president for over the first 50 years of our nations existence.And, I do not
think there has been one since.If you look it up you will find not one of our founding fathers were Christian.Not even Jefferson.I know he wrote the Jefferson bible, but, that's just because he, like the other founding fathers, did not believe Jesus to be of divine decent.So, he kept his philosophy while removing all the mystical and dogmatic concepts.
I
think it's about time a
religious leader followed Christ's actions.
As a world
leader for freedom and the protection of basic human rights, the United States should take every opportunity to advocate for people — including Americans here at home — to
think, believe, and act according to their
religious belief whether they belong to a minority or majority religion in their nation.»
the
thought processes of many of thie
religious leaders..
Although both of these movements created militant groups in which the
leader claimed temporal and spiritual power, they did not leave any appreciable marks on Muslim
religious thought.
Religious leaders and pastors also come in for some gentle chiding from Wuthnow, who
thinks they hold views about human action and social change that are simplistic and individualistic.
Back in the day, the Jewish
religious leaders didn't
think it was cool that Jesus called Himself the Messiah and God and His followers did (and still do) the same.
Of course, I don't
think I'm in a position to go around blasting any
religious leaders.
You take someone else's explanation for scripture because: a) Everyone else does, b) The person explaining is a
religious «
leader», or c) It's easier than
thinking for yourself.
European religion is phony actors inside big Ugly goofy buildings built by retard Gentile European who
think king David was a red headed European who spoke Latin as his birth language in the middle east.European
religious people are like a 400 pound anchor dragging in the sand wanting the 12 Hebrew Isrealite Tribes to all sing kombiyah at their lame hang another picture up cannonized a lame Gentile fake
leader of a has been lame their whole life
People who
think they have committed the unforgivable sin usually have a
religious leader who is trying to control them, or warped and dangerous ideas about who God is and what God is like.
But
religious leaders spend almost as much time making you feel guilty about actually
thinking, than they do raising money from the non-thinkers.
This revolution in
religious thought is exemplified by
religious leaders» current support for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was drafted by the UN Commission on Human Rights.
I
think to some degree he was also trying to say something to the
religious leaders of His day about their own lack of inner righteousness.
As for the reason Jesus was put to death, Cox locates the proximate cause not in humanity's sinfulness; nor in Jewish outrage over Jesus» claims to be the Son of God and the Way, the Truth, and the Life; nor in the jealousy of
religious leaders threatened by Jesus» miracles (which Cox suggests were the fruit of positive
thinking on the part of those who «feel» healed after touching Jesus); nor in his teachings (which Cox insists were uncontroversial among the Jews).
The man is showing independent
thought and not blindly following what
religious leaders say.
Even if it is unpopular and flies in the face of what other «
religious»
leaders do and
think, we've been given a picture of how to treat those who need our help, even if they are different than us.
I
think I just read about a radio talk show host who is beginning to understand that a
religious leader (the Pope) is outside his personal political ideology.
But then, I don't
think I've ever heard any
religious leader ever DARE to try to answer that question and give a credible positive spin to it.
While I
think Jones is an idiot and a charlatan (same as any so - called
religious leader including the pope - a-dope), I must defend his right to believe and say whatever he likes.
Way too often it's the conservative Christians who seem to
think that men are the only ones «qualified» to be
religious leaders.
This revolution in
religious thought is exemplified by
religious leaders» current support for the Universal Declaration of...
A survey that William McKinney and I recently conducted invited 1,500 conservative and mainline Protestant denominational
leaders to choose from a list of 63 contemporary
religious leaders and authors the ten who have had «the greatest impact on your
thinking about the church's life and mission today.»
One can
think of
religious restructuring as partially motivated enterprise in which organizational
leaders and followers produce ideas and actions within given institutional constraints.
My take: «I'm going to believe what my
religious leaders tell me just so I don't have to
think» is a cop - out.
@KM, you're not completely wrong, there are believers in all of the world's religions who are perfectly content to let their
religious leaders tell them what to
think, but consider that 95 % or so of the world's population believe in god in one form or another.
In either event,
religious leaders and FBOs need to make informed decisions, neither rushing haphazardly into new public partnerships without weighing the pros and cons, nor simply dismissing such collaborations without any
thought about what their social responsibilities might be.
maybe these
religious leaders should be
thinking about why they tacitly supported arab dictators for so long (and still do) while their own people are rising up for (american style) democracy.
We both
think the evidence is good that prominent evolutionists have joined with equally prominent theologians and
religious leaders to sweep under the rug the incompatibilities of evolution and religion, and we both deplore this strategy.
Spiritual but not
religious simply means one is able to
think for themselves and decide what is the truth instead of
religious leaders (and very powerful ones at that) telling us what to believe.
, historians help us understand that the Judaism of Jesus» time was more diverse, interesting and grace - filled than the Gospels would lead us to
think, and that the crucifixion can not be understood as simply the result of a
religious plot against Jesus carried out by the Jewish people or their
leaders.
that famous preacher and
religious leader stated to me that he had never met anyone who didn't
think that God was the «Higher Power» to which Bill Wilson referred.
Instead, I
think Jesus was simply pointing out that the
religious leaders were not following the law at all, but were instead misusing the law in a way that allowed them to dishonor their parents, which was the exact opposite intention of the law (see 7:13).
Considering there is the small matter «separation of church and state» I
think those
religious leaders are looking for a pay raise from their sheep, and not staying tax free is what they seem to thumb their noses at.
Yet the same words struck fear into most
thinking Europeans of the day, including
religious leaders; they appeared then to threaten the very fabric of society.
And it is this aspect which the radical
leaders of
religious thought overlook, apparently with intention.
If the people of the religion of Islam who do not
think violence is the answer then why have I not seen anywhere your
religious leaders condem what has been done to inocent people?
I certainly don't
think Jesus gave up himself to a brutal execution because he believed he was upholding a common philosophy with other
religious leaders.
So when Jesus tells the man «Go and sin no more or else something worse might happen to you,» I
think he says it with a sparkle in His eye, some satire in His voice, and a head nod toward the disapproving and judgmental
religious leaders.
Religious leaders, I think, face alternatives not easily reconciled: to try to form communities in which biblical imagery and ideas provide an alternative vision to our cultural ones, or to engage in a process of mutual critique, edification, correction and revision of frameworks that are informed both by our religious traditions and by the sciences and
Religious leaders, I
think, face alternatives not easily reconciled: to try to form communities in which biblical imagery and ideas provide an alternative vision to our cultural ones, or to engage in a process of mutual critique, edification, correction and revision of frameworks that are informed both by our
religious traditions and by the sciences and
religious traditions and by the sciences and culture.