The traditional culture met
the religious needs of people in a variety of ways.
There are at least three aspects to the fundamental
religious needs of persons:
Not exact matches
Rabbi Jonah Pesner, director
of the
Religious Action Center
of Reform Judaism, discussed how
people of all faiths
need to unify to help others overcome social problems in the United States at an interfaith discussion
of clergy leaders in Palm Beach County...
A better strategy would be to point out how one doesn't
need religion to be a moral
person, and then demonstrate how some
of the
people that claim to be a beacon for
religious zealots (the GOP) practice an existence devoid
of morality.
Well it is true that some
people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow
of his business income... In such case it is either you are
religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you
need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out
of you with tales and stories... There is another type
of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment
of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents
of public toilets and market places... Some
of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one
of them or possessed by one
of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...
A very large part
of most
religious beliefs involves free will and
people are free to work towards affording healthcare,
people and
people can adopt healthy lifestyles which minimize the
need for healthcare and
of course,
people can choose to help others through donations.
I don't feel the
need to cater to the religiously naive and uneducated by acting like there's a difference especially when these same
religious folk would surely deem a
person of an opposing religion / view that heard voices crazy.
People like Jon are the reason I will
need to stay vigilant long after my children graduate to make sure that they are not poisoned by the «science»
of the
religious zealots, but so to that my future doctors are not, as well!
In other words with all the things going on in the world this long winded ambiguous rant about the
religious beliefs
of a horror writer whose name I've barely heard mentioned in the last decade is being presented as the most important information
people need to know at this particular time.
I am for the elimination
of hate, fear and control, religion is just the catalyst that
people use to hate, fear and control, getting rid
of religion won't solve the problem, its like putting a band aid on a severe cut, its temporary, and it just hits the surface, instead we
need to go deeper than that to the root cause, I know lots
of religious people who don't hate, fear or control, there are also many beliefs such as paganism, Buddism, Taoism, which doesn't use hate fear, and self righteousness to condemn others, I think if maybe more
of the most major religions followed there teachings then we wouldn't have as much problems as we do.
But a
religious person needs him as much as the secular
person, because the modern Protestant or Catholic or Jew has plenty
of trouble hearing God's voice.
As I'm writing this, I can see all the
religious people saying all atheists should be fired because they bring the devil into the place
of work... so I feel the
need to provide the caveat: conflict with their objectives in a way that is sanely and reasonably shown.
To buck the system and engage in sex outside
of the institution
of marriage challenges the system and the
religious system
needs derogatory terms for such
people.
The notion
of a
religious «think tank» is ridiculous, unless a
person wanted to violate the law to promote religion and
needed help in thinking
of ways to distort the truth in self - serving ways.
Confession time here: although I don't usually end up at places such as drunken parties, stripper bars and porn shops while hanging out with friends, since those activities and places hold little appeal for me, I know I
need to stay away from certain «
religious»
people, those who seem to love only themselves and who seem hell - bent on being nasty to
people they describe as «sinners», supposedly in the name
of truth - telling.
It will «
need religious people who live with moral integrity and show the power
of their ideas in practice.»
So... why are these
people not saying what really
needs to be said... some
of these Presidents were no more than DEISTS and had no
religious affiliation...
Actually, many
people seem to think that a lot
of people who attend church do not follow Jesus, but merely attend church for their own reasons, such as
needing some sort
of religious system to identify with.
«Purify [the Hadith];... Find a new practice
of the concept
of interaction between the sexes;... Separate religion from the state;... Give guidelines on Western customs, and eliminate incorrect behaviours;... Invite the
people to go to God through gratitude and wisdom, and not with threats;... Recognise the right
of Christians to occupy important positions [including] the presidency
of the republic;... Separate
religious discourse from power, and re-establish its connection with the
needs of society.»
First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer
needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid
of the
religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance
religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is
of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel
of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)
At this time, when the
people are moved by a strong urge for social equality and economic and political justice, there is a great
need for a country - wide agency to look after their
religious needs and to guide them to an understanding
of the principles
of Islam.
Scientific understanding, humane appreciation, existentialist self - awareness, history as cumulative experience, psychological insight, and respectful regard for what
religious people have to tell us about their experience — all are
needed for and capable
of inclusion in this new perspective.
Granted that, as in modern hymnals, expressions
of religious need and aspiration originally born out
of individual experience were often used in public application and became the voice
of the whole
people, still that very poignancy that made them thus generally applicable came from the intensely intimate experience in which they started.
It was only after he found fame as an adult that his followers, like those
of any
religious or cult leader, felt the
need to embellish his birth to supernatural status and fit it into to the expectations
of the
people they were trying to convince or influence.
The church and the pope are responsible for two murders
of women who died because they
needed an abortion in catholic countries (Ireland and The Dominican Republic) Just as you
people cry out against «abortion» and then murder doctors and women and bomb clinics, I hope somebody will start crying out against your beloved «
religious freedom» and then...????
If one
person had a lot
of something it was their
religious obligation to share that with those in
need.
In 1996 the NAE addressed
religious persecution saying that «If
people are to fulfill the obligations
of conscience, history teaches the urgent
need to foster respect and protection for the right
of all
persons to practice their faith.»
Jane Jacobs, generally considered the founder
of modern urban design, thought cities should take the everyday
needs of people into account but did not mention religion or
religious buildings in her foundational book.
Maybe I
need to go back to college and take an «Advanced
Religious Metaphor» class, because to a rational
person that sounded like random words strung together without any form
of logical thought.
The
religious and faithful
need to grow a thicker skin, especially since prayer has also never been shown to be even a little beneficial except to relieve the guilt
of the praying
person.
Whenever pluralism becomes too content with a relaxed model
of «dialogue,» it can ignore the
need for conflict and the actualities
of systematic distortions in the personal (psychosis), historical (alienation and oppression) and
religious (sin) dimensions
of every
person, culture and tradition.
If you believe that your particular «brand»
of Christianity is superior to others and that
people need to be converted to your particular
religious views then it is time to take a long hard look at you are part
of.
«After all,» says Barbara Rogasky, an editor
of religious paperbacks for Pyramid Publications, «while institutions as such are all in disarray, that doesn't change
people's
need for definition, direction and guidance.
Religious groups can help meet the
need of persons to be instruments
of personal growth and social change.
«We've been clear that
people need to be able to feel strong in their
religious identities and are making sure that the voices
of people of faith are heard in Government.»
The recent Diana cult is also a pastiche
of stories and longings and public relations efforts that serves the
religious needs of an astounding number
of people.
I have proposed one: the government must treat
religious people and institutions the same way it treats comparable nonreligious
people and institutions, unless special accommodation is
needed to protect
religious liberty from a facially neutral law that conflicts with
religious obligations or forms
of organization.
I envy the comfort that many
people seem to get from their
religious beliefs especially in a time
of need.
If «the reality
of the religion
of a
people can be studied only through the empirical enquiry into the meaning appropriated by them as
persons and community
of persons in their life situations, «32 then Dalit theology
needs to look carefully into popular level
of Hindu - Christian
religious encounter.
Yet it can not be denied that there are, even today, many who are sincere in their acknowledgment
of feeling a deep
need for mystery in their lives — and such
people are generally members
of some kind
of religious group.
What
religious people need to realize is the simple fact that you are asserting that there IS some type
of being out there.
She reminded the House
of the immense contributions that
people of faith are making to the well - being
of the nation — schools, food banks, social support, child care and many others - and concluded that there is a
need for greater
religious literacy.
Partly under the impact
of constant conditioning in consumerism,
people in western democratic societies increasingly are putting together their own
religious belief and life - style packages in order to meet individual
needs.
As established, culturally supported
religious practices and traditional communities have weakened, many
people feel the
need for some way
of dealing with their inner stress and emptiness.
The world
needs people of different disciplines and
religious beliefs so that we can triangulate on the truth.
Evan, the
people who
need your «love» are the
religious masters who
need 10 %
of your income.
This author tries to depict «God» as someone who
needs to be understood, again Christians (or
religious people in general for that matter) trying to find any way possible to connect other humans with their deity
of choice.
The Editor in the Preface says that the Tract «polemises against a form
of narrow sectarian Secularism which refuses to be sensitive to tradition and faith» and argues that Secularism
needs to be rethought taking
religious faith seriously, that «only then can Secularism reclaim the ideological space which Fundamentalists are threatening to take over, only then can Secularists capture the minds
of the
people» (p.vi).
Nor
need I feel shame that I do not respect the «
religious rights»
of people whose god tells them that I deserve to be slaughtered.
The point here is that any
religious people needs a means
of returning to its past.